All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:33:25 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DCCDEC5.3040201@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik_weiOC82uRKRamFan4QMi1u3s7g@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

>>>> (3) schedule() makes fallback and cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback
>>>>      change task->cpus_allowed
>>>
>>> I'm failing to see how this is happening, surely that kthread isn't
>>> actually running that early?
>>
>> If my understand correctly, current call graph is below.
>>
>> kernel_init()
>>         smp_init();
>>                 cpu_up()
>>                         ... cpu hotplug notification
>>                                 kthread_create()
>>         sched_init_smp();
>>
>>
>> So, cpu hotplug event is happen before sched_init_smp(). The old rule is,
>> all kthreads of using cpu-up notification have to use kthread_bind(). It
>> protected from sched load balance.
>>
>> but, now cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() forcedly change kthread's cpumask.
>> Why is this works? the point are two.
>>
>> - rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop() call set_cpus_allowed_ptr() again
>> periodically.
>>   then, it can reset cpumask if cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() change it.
>>   my debug print obseve following cpumask change occur at boot time.
>>      1) kthread_bind: bind cpu1
>>      2) cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback: bind possible cpu
>>      3) rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop: rebind cpu1
>> - while tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1, sched load balancer never be crash.
>
> Seems rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread() call wake_up_process() directly,
> which is under hotplug event CPU_UP_PREPARE. Maybe it should be
> under CPU_ONLINE.

Hmm..

I haven't catch your point. cpu_up() call both CPU_UP_PREPARE and CPU_ONLINE
notification. Thus, CPU_ONLINE still be called before sched_init_smp().

Am I missing something?



  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-13  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-28 14:20 [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 10:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:55     ` [PATCH 1/2] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-11 16:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13  5:48         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  6:42           ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  7:33             ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-05-13  7:43               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  9:34                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 17:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-14 11:17               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 13:37               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19  8:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:54                   ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-15 18:55             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 13:26               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19  6:06                 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  6:08                   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-28 16:35                     ` [tip:sched/urgent] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(), " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20 10:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21  9:54                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  8:34                   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:50                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  9:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:12                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 11:41                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 22:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-19  8:55                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-02 10:56     ` [PATCH 2/2] sched, cpuset: introduce do_set_cpus_allowed() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 12:58     ` [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DCCDEC5.3040201@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.