From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> To: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@codeaurora.org> Cc: "mitchelh@codeaurora.org" <mitchelh@codeaurora.org>, "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Do not access non-existing SMR registers Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:22:54 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140807092254.GH13703@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <53E2BB71.9000201@codeaurora.org> On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 12:34:09AM +0100, Olav Haugan wrote: > On 8/6/2014 10:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hmm, I'm checking this with the architects because the TRMs aren't exactly > > clear. The NUMSMRG works for stream-indexing (i.e. reports the number of > > S2CRs), then all we have to do is change the above ~SMR_VALID to 0x0, since > > those registers will be SBZP. > > You don't agree that we should avoid doing register writes if not > necessarily? In general I like to avoid trying to write registers that > is not needed so that we don't do more work than needed. If this was a fast-path then I'd certainly agree. However, device reset is a pretty rare event and I'd be inclined to err on the side of code clarity in preference to performance. Anyway, it turns out that we can't use NUMSMRG for this so all that's moot. We instead need to do 1 << SMMU_IDR0.NUMSIDB, which will give us the number of S2CRs. > >> As far as I can tell there are no other register telling us how many S2CR > >> registers exist. That also brings up another point that there is no check > >> in the code to ensure we are not trying to program more than the available > >> S2CR registers when we use stream indexing. > > > > On an SMMU using stream-indexing, if the StreamID goes off the end of the > > S2CRs that's a fairly serious hardware configuration issue which I don't > > think Linux is in a position to handle. I agree that a warning wouldn't > > hurt on device add/attach though. > > > > Yes, I meant to protect against programming errors where someone > specified more Stream IDs than available S2CRs. Sure. Could you have a go at hacking this up, please? Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Do not access non-existing SMR registers Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:22:54 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20140807092254.GH13703@arm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <53E2BB71.9000201@codeaurora.org> On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 12:34:09AM +0100, Olav Haugan wrote: > On 8/6/2014 10:35 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hmm, I'm checking this with the architects because the TRMs aren't exactly > > clear. The NUMSMRG works for stream-indexing (i.e. reports the number of > > S2CRs), then all we have to do is change the above ~SMR_VALID to 0x0, since > > those registers will be SBZP. > > You don't agree that we should avoid doing register writes if not > necessarily? In general I like to avoid trying to write registers that > is not needed so that we don't do more work than needed. If this was a fast-path then I'd certainly agree. However, device reset is a pretty rare event and I'd be inclined to err on the side of code clarity in preference to performance. Anyway, it turns out that we can't use NUMSMRG for this so all that's moot. We instead need to do 1 << SMMU_IDR0.NUMSIDB, which will give us the number of S2CRs. > >> As far as I can tell there are no other register telling us how many S2CR > >> registers exist. That also brings up another point that there is no check > >> in the code to ensure we are not trying to program more than the available > >> S2CR registers when we use stream indexing. > > > > On an SMMU using stream-indexing, if the StreamID goes off the end of the > > S2CRs that's a fairly serious hardware configuration issue which I don't > > think Linux is in a position to handle. I agree that a warning wouldn't > > hurt on device add/attach though. > > > > Yes, I meant to protect against programming errors where someone > specified more Stream IDs than available S2CRs. Sure. Could you have a go at hacking this up, please? Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-07 9:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-08-04 18:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm-smmu fixes for CBn_TCR and S2CR/SMR programming Olav Haugan 2014-08-04 18:01 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-04 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Fix programming of SMMU_CBn_TCR for stage 1 Olav Haugan 2014-08-04 18:01 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-04 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Do not access non-existing SMR registers Olav Haugan 2014-08-04 18:01 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-06 10:19 ` Will Deacon 2014-08-06 10:19 ` Will Deacon 2014-08-06 16:44 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-06 16:44 ` Olav Haugan [not found] ` <53E25B76.6090208-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> 2014-08-06 17:35 ` Will Deacon 2014-08-06 17:35 ` Will Deacon [not found] ` <20140806173518.GG25953-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2014-08-06 23:34 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-06 23:34 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-07 9:22 ` Will Deacon [this message] 2014-08-07 9:22 ` Will Deacon [not found] ` <20140807092254.GH13703-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> 2014-08-08 18:51 ` Olav Haugan 2014-08-08 18:51 ` Olav Haugan
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20140807092254.GH13703@arm.com \ --to=will.deacon@arm.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mitchelh@codeaurora.org \ --cc=ohaugan@codeaurora.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.