All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue
@ 2015-05-14  8:33 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2015-05-14  8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires
  Cc: Mika Westerberg, Antonio Borneo, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol,
	Andrew Duggan, Gwendal Grignou, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-input,
	kernel-janitors, Joe Perches

These defines are used like this:

	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_STARTED, &ihid->flags))

The intent was to use bits 0, 1, and 2 but because of the extra shifts
we're using bits 1, 2, and 4.  It's harmless becuase it's done
consistently but it's not the intent and static checkers will complain.

Fixes: 4a200c3b9a40 ('HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
index 92d6cdf..cadec6a 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
 #include <linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h>
 
 /* flags */
-#define I2C_HID_STARTED		(1 << 0)
-#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	(1 << 1)
-#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	(1 << 2)
+#define I2C_HID_STARTED		0
+#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	1
+#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	2
 
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_ON		0x00
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP	0x01

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue
@ 2015-05-14  8:33 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2015-05-14  8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Kosina, Benjamin Tissoires
  Cc: Mika Westerberg, Antonio Borneo, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol,
	Andrew Duggan, Gwendal Grignou, Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-input,
	kernel-janitors, Joe Perches

These defines are used like this:

	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_STARTED, &ihid->flags))

The intent was to use bits 0, 1, and 2 but because of the extra shifts
we're using bits 1, 2, and 4.  It's harmless becuase it's done
consistently but it's not the intent and static checkers will complain.

Fixes: 4a200c3b9a40 ('HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
index 92d6cdf..cadec6a 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
 #include <linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h>
 
 /* flags */
-#define I2C_HID_STARTED		(1 << 0)
-#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	(1 << 1)
-#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	(1 << 2)
+#define I2C_HID_STARTED		0
+#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	1
+#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	2
 
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_ON		0x00
 #define I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP	0x01

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue
  2015-05-14  8:33 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2015-05-14 14:17   ` Benjamin Tissoires
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Tissoires @ 2015-05-14 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Jiri Kosina, Mika Westerberg, Antonio Borneo,
	Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol, Andrew Duggan, Gwendal Grignou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-input, kernel-janitors, Joe Perches

On May 14 2015 or thereabouts, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> These defines are used like this:
> 
> 	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_STARTED, &ihid->flags))
> 
> The intent was to use bits 0, 1, and 2 but because of the extra shifts
> we're using bits 1, 2, and 4.  It's harmless becuase it's done
> consistently but it's not the intent and static checkers will complain.
> 
> Fixes: 4a200c3b9a40 ('HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Same as the other one: 

Oops. Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

Cheers,
Benjamin


> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> index 92d6cdf..cadec6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
>  #include <linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h>
>  
>  /* flags */
> -#define I2C_HID_STARTED		(1 << 0)
> -#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	(1 << 1)
> -#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	(1 << 2)
> +#define I2C_HID_STARTED		0
> +#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	1
> +#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	2
>  
>  #define I2C_HID_PWR_ON		0x00
>  #define I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP	0x01

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue
@ 2015-05-14 14:17   ` Benjamin Tissoires
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Tissoires @ 2015-05-14 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Jiri Kosina, Mika Westerberg, Antonio Borneo,
	Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol, Andrew Duggan, Gwendal Grignou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-input, kernel-janitors, Joe Perches

On May 14 2015 or thereabouts, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> These defines are used like this:
> 
> 	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_STARTED, &ihid->flags))
> 
> The intent was to use bits 0, 1, and 2 but because of the extra shifts
> we're using bits 1, 2, and 4.  It's harmless becuase it's done
> consistently but it's not the intent and static checkers will complain.
> 
> Fixes: 4a200c3b9a40 ('HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Same as the other one: 

Oops. Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

Cheers,
Benjamin


> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> index 92d6cdf..cadec6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> @@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
>  #include <linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h>
>  
>  /* flags */
> -#define I2C_HID_STARTED		(1 << 0)
> -#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	(1 << 1)
> -#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	(1 << 2)
> +#define I2C_HID_STARTED		0
> +#define I2C_HID_RESET_PENDING	1
> +#define I2C_HID_READ_PENDING	2
>  
>  #define I2C_HID_PWR_ON		0x00
>  #define I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP	0x01

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue
  2015-05-14  8:33 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2015-05-18  9:24   ` Jiri Kosina
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2015-05-18  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, Mika Westerberg, Antonio Borneo,
	Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol, Andrew Duggan, Gwendal Grignou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-input, kernel-janitors, Joe Perches

On Thu, 14 May 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> These defines are used like this:
> 
> 	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_STARTED, &ihid->flags))
> 
> The intent was to use bits 0, 1, and 2 but because of the extra shifts
> we're using bits 1, 2, and 4.  It's harmless becuase it's done
> consistently but it's not the intent and static checkers will complain.
> 
> Fixes: 4a200c3b9a40 ('HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Applied to for-4.2/upstream, thanks Dan.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue
@ 2015-05-18  9:24   ` Jiri Kosina
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Kosina @ 2015-05-18  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, Mika Westerberg, Antonio Borneo,
	Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol, Andrew Duggan, Gwendal Grignou,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-input, kernel-janitors, Joe Perches

On Thu, 14 May 2015, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> These defines are used like this:
> 
> 	if (test_bit(I2C_HID_STARTED, &ihid->flags))
> 
> The intent was to use bits 0, 1, and 2 but because of the extra shifts
> we're using bits 1, 2, and 4.  It's harmless becuase it's done
> consistently but it's not the intent and static checkers will complain.
> 
> Fixes: 4a200c3b9a40 ('HID: i2c-hid: introduce HID over i2c specification implementation')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

Applied to for-4.2/upstream, thanks Dan.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-18  9:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-14  8:33 [patch] HID: i2c-hid: fix harmless test_bit() issue Dan Carpenter
2015-05-14  8:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-14 14:17 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2015-05-14 14:17   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2015-05-18  9:24 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-18  9:24   ` Jiri Kosina

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.