From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@xilinx.com>
Cc: pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com,
balbi@ti.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hyun.kwon@xilinx.com,
navam@xilinx.com, radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Axi-usb: Add support for 64-bit addressing.
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:03:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412140338.GA19311@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460360506-14692-1-git-send-email-navam@xilinx.com>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:11:46PM +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> This patch updates the driver to support 64-bit DMA
> addressing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xilinx.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt | 3 +-
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-xilinx.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt
> index 47b4e39..d417872 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt
> @@ -7,12 +7,13 @@ Required properties:
> - interrupts : Should contain single irq line of USB2 device
> controller
> - xlnx,has-builtin-dma : if DMA is included
> -
> +- xlnx,addrwidth : Should be the dma addressing size in bits(ex: 40 bits).
Now this property shows up in a 2nd device. Now I'm more convinced this
is the wrong approach and should use dma-ranges.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Axi-usb: Add support for 64-bit addressing.
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:03:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412140338.GA19311@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460360506-14692-1-git-send-email-navam@xilinx.com>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:11:46PM +0530, Nava kishore Manne wrote:
> This patch updates the driver to support 64-bit DMA
> addressing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nava kishore Manne <navam@xilinx.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt | 3 +-
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/udc-xilinx.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt
> index 47b4e39..d417872 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/udc-xilinx.txt
> @@ -7,12 +7,13 @@ Required properties:
> - interrupts : Should contain single irq line of USB2 device
> controller
> - xlnx,has-builtin-dma : if DMA is included
> -
> +- xlnx,addrwidth : Should be the dma addressing size in bits(ex: 40 bits).
Now this property shows up in a 2nd device. Now I'm more convinced this
is the wrong approach and should use dma-ranges.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-12 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-11 7:41 [PATCH] Axi-usb: Add support for 64-bit addressing Nava kishore Manne
2016-04-11 7:41 ` Nava kishore Manne
2016-04-11 7:41 ` Nava kishore Manne
2016-04-11 8:08 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-11 8:08 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-11 8:08 ` kbuild test robot
2016-04-17 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-17 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-12 14:03 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2016-04-12 14:03 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-17 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-17 13:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:29 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-18 14:29 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-18 14:29 ` Rob Herring
2016-04-18 14:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-18 14:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19 9:15 ` Nava kishore Manne
2016-04-19 9:15 ` Nava kishore Manne
2016-04-19 9:15 ` Nava kishore Manne
2016-04-19 14:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19 14:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-04-19 14:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160412140338.GA19311@rob-hp-laptop \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hyun.kwon@xilinx.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=nava.manne@xilinx.com \
--cc=navam@xilinx.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com \
--cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.