All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Frank Ramsay <framsay@redhat.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/smp: Fix __max_logical_packages value setup
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:24:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160812122457.GC8062@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160811134651.GW30192@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:46:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > hum, so we either need some acpi solution to get number of all
> > sockets or
> 
> This.. So the problem here is that the BIOS completely screws us over.
> 
> It wrecks the ACPI-ID table with that option to limit the number of CPUs
> exposed to the OS (note that it didn't need to do that, it could have
> enumerated them as empty, instead of not there at all) while keeping the
> CPUID of the CPUs as reporting they have many (12? was it) cores.
> 
> This results in inconsistent state, and we're left with nothing useful.
> 
> > fix the uncore code to initialize pmu boxes on cpu hotplug as well
> 
> Can't.. it uses the boxes at STARTING time, and we can't do allocs
> there. Not can we alloc earlier, because we don't know max_packages is
> going to increase.

I still need to test this, but would this be something
like you proposed on irc?

thanks,
jirka


---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 2a6e84a30a54..4296beb8fdd3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -100,10 +100,11 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_info);
 /* Logical package management. We might want to allocate that dynamically */
 static int *physical_to_logical_pkg __read_mostly;
 static unsigned long *physical_package_map __read_mostly;;
-static unsigned long *logical_package_map  __read_mostly;
 static unsigned int max_physical_pkg_id __read_mostly;
 unsigned int __max_logical_packages __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__max_logical_packages);
+static unsigned int logical_packages __read_mostly;
+static bool logical_packages_frozen __read_mostly;
 
 /* Maximum number of SMT threads on any online core */
 int __max_smt_threads __read_mostly;
@@ -277,14 +278,14 @@ int topology_update_package_map(unsigned int apicid, unsigned int cpu)
 	if (test_and_set_bit(pkg, physical_package_map))
 		goto found;
 
-	new = find_first_zero_bit(logical_package_map, __max_logical_packages);
-	if (new >= __max_logical_packages) {
+	if (logical_packages_frozen) {
 		physical_to_logical_pkg[pkg] = -1;
-		pr_warn("APIC(%x) Package %u exceeds logical package map\n",
+		pr_warn("APIC(%x) Package %u exceeds logical package max\n",
 			apicid, pkg);
 		return -ENOSPC;
 	}
-	set_bit(new, logical_package_map);
+
+	new = logical_packages++;
 	pr_info("APIC(%x) Converting physical %u to logical package %u\n",
 		apicid, pkg, new);
 	physical_to_logical_pkg[pkg] = new;
@@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(void)
 	}
 
 	__max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(total_cpus, ncpus);
+	logical_packages = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Possibly larger than what we need as the number of apic ids per
@@ -352,10 +354,6 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(void)
 	memset(physical_to_logical_pkg, 0xff, size);
 	size = BITS_TO_LONGS(max_physical_pkg_id) * sizeof(unsigned long);
 	physical_package_map = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	size = BITS_TO_LONGS(__max_logical_packages) * sizeof(unsigned long);
-	logical_package_map = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-
-	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
 
 	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
 		unsigned int apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid(cpu);
@@ -369,6 +367,15 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(void)
 		set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
 		set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
 	}
+
+	if (logical_packages > __max_logical_packages) {
+		pr_warn("Detected more packages (%u), then computed by BIOS data (%u).\n",
+			logical_packages, __max_logical_packages);
+		logical_packages_frozen = true;
+		__max_logical_packages  = logical_packages;
+	}
+
+	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
 }
 
 void __init smp_store_boot_cpu_info(void)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-12 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-03 16:23 [RFC][PATCH] x86/smp: Fix __max_logical_packages value setup Jiri Olsa
2016-08-10 11:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-10 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-10 14:00   ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-10 14:15     ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-10 15:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-10 16:14         ` [PATCH] " Jiri Olsa
2016-08-11 12:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-11 13:05             ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-11 13:46               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-12 12:24                 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-08-12 13:12                   ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-15  9:04                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-08-15 10:17                     ` Jiri Olsa
2016-08-15 11:46                       ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-08-18 10:50                       ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160812122457.GC8062@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=framsay@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.