All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on VLV/CHV
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:03:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171020170319.24910-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171018204825.2500-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Store the punit DSPFREQUAR value into cdclk_state->voltage on
VLV/CHV. Since we can actually read that out from the hardware
this can give us a bit more cross checking between the hardware
and software state.

v2: Don't break waiting for cdclk change on VLV/CHV
v3: Split out the cdclk sanity check in vlv_set_cdclk() (Rodrigo)

Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
index 522222f8bb50..e2f18545d20c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -437,13 +437,45 @@ static int vlv_calc_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int min_cdclk)
 		return 200000;
 }
 
+static u8 vlv_calc_voltage(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk)
+{
+	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
+		if (cdclk >= 320000) /* jump to highest voltage for 400MHz too */
+			return 2;
+		else if (cdclk >= 266667)
+			return 1;
+		else
+			return 0;
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Specs are full of misinformation, but testing on actual
+		 * hardware has shown that we just need to write the desired
+		 * CCK divider into the Punit register.
+		 */
+		return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
+	}
+}
+
 static void vlv_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			  struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 {
+	u32 val;
+
 	cdclk_state->vco = vlv_get_hpll_vco(dev_priv);
 	cdclk_state->cdclk = vlv_get_cck_clock(dev_priv, "cdclk",
 					       CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL,
 					       cdclk_state->vco);
+
+	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
+	val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
+	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
+
+	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
+		cdclk_state->voltage = (val & DSPFREQGUAR_MASK) >>
+			DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT;
+	else
+		cdclk_state->voltage = (val & DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV) >>
+			DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT_CHV;
 }
 
 static void vlv_program_pfi_credits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -486,7 +518,7 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			  const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 {
 	int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
-	u32 val, cmd;
+	u32 val, cmd = cdclk_state->voltage;
 
 	/* There are cases where we can end up here with power domains
 	 * off and a CDCLK frequency other than the minimum, like when
@@ -496,13 +528,6 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 */
 	intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A);
 
-	if (cdclk >= 320000) /* jump to highest voltage for 400MHz too */
-		cmd = 2;
-	else if (cdclk == 266667)
-		cmd = 1;
-	else
-		cmd = 0;
-
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
 	val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
 	val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
@@ -562,7 +587,7 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			  const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
 {
 	int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
-	u32 val, cmd;
+	u32 val, cmd = cdclk_state->voltage;
 
 	switch (cdclk) {
 	case 333333:
@@ -583,13 +608,6 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 */
 	intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A);
 
-	/*
-	 * Specs are full of misinformation, but testing on actual
-	 * hardware has shown that we just need to write the desired
-	 * CCK divider into the Punit register.
-	 */
-	cmd = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
-
 	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
 	val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
 	val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV;
@@ -1859,11 +1877,15 @@ static int vlv_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
 	cdclk = vlv_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, min_cdclk);
 
 	intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
+	intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage =
+		vlv_calc_voltage(dev_priv, cdclk);
 
 	if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
 		cdclk = vlv_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
 
 		intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
+		intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage =
+			vlv_calc_voltage(dev_priv, cdclk);
 	} else {
 		intel_state->cdclk.actual =
 			intel_state->cdclk.logical;
-- 
2.13.6

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-20 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-18 20:48 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915: Clean up some cdclk switch statements Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19  7:20   ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Start tracking voltage level in the cdclk state Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:32   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 14:01   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:43     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 12:13       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 17:14         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915: USe cdclk_state->voltage on VLV/CHV Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 17:43   ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/i915: Use " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:42     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:20       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03   ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BDW Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:44   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 16:14     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:03   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:47     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on SKL/KBL/CFL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:47   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:45       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on BXT/GLK Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 20:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL Ville Syrjala
2017-10-18 21:50   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 22:43     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-19 10:48     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 10:56       ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-19 12:19         ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 23:52       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-23 18:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 20:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Adjust system agent voltage on CNL if required by DDI ports Ville Syrjala
2017-10-19 23:54   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 11:11     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:48       ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-20 20:07         ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 20:36           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-20 21:44             ` Runyan, Arthur J
2017-10-23 12:03               ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-23 11:48             ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 14:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:11       ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 16:09   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-20 16:52     ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-20 17:05   ` [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2017-10-23 18:39     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 21:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing Patchwork
2017-10-19 17:31   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-19 18:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-19 18:52 ` Patchwork
2017-10-19 20:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning " Patchwork
2017-10-19 23:27 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2017-10-20  0:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-20 16:28 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev3) Patchwork
2017-10-20 17:48 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: CNL DVFS thing (rev6) Patchwork
2017-10-20 19:19 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171020170319.24910-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.