* [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
@ 2018-03-19 13:49 Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control Michal Wajdeczko
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michal Wajdeczko @ 2018-03-19 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't
operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC.
Better to use guc_action prefix.
v2: rebase + naming compromise
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index 4cb422c..39928e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
* registers value.
*/
-static int guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int guc_action_flush_log_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
u32 action[] = {
INTEL_GUC_ACTION_LOG_BUFFER_FILE_FLUSH_COMPLETE
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
}
-static int guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int guc_action_flush_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
{
u32 action[] = {
INTEL_GUC_ACTION_FORCE_LOG_BUFFER_FLUSH,
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static int guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc)
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
}
-static int guc_log_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
- bool default_logging, u32 verbosity)
+static int guc_action_control_log(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
+ bool default_logging, u32 verbosity)
{
union guc_log_control control_val = {
{
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void guc_log_capture_logs(struct intel_guc_log *log)
* time, so get/put should be really quick.
*/
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
- guc_log_flush_complete(guc);
+ guc_action_flush_log_complete(guc);
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
}
@@ -527,9 +527,9 @@ int intel_guc_log_level_set(struct intel_guc_log *log, u64 val)
}
intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
- ret = guc_log_control(guc, GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSE(val),
- GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_ENABLED(val),
- GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(val));
+ ret = guc_action_control_log(guc, GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSE(val),
+ GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_ENABLED(val),
+ GUC_LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(val));
intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
if (ret) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("guc_log_control action failed %d\n", ret);
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ void intel_guc_log_relay_flush(struct intel_guc_log *log)
flush_work(&log->relay.flush_work);
intel_runtime_pm_get(i915);
- guc_log_flush(guc);
+ guc_action_flush_log(guc);
intel_runtime_pm_put(i915);
/* GuC would have updated log buffer by now, so capture it */
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control
2018-03-19 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michal Wajdeczko
@ 2018-03-19 13:49 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 15:32 ` Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header Michal Wajdeczko
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michal Wajdeczko @ 2018-03-19 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Usually we use shift/mask macros for bit field definitions.
Union guc_log_control was not following that pattern.
Additional bonus:
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-25 (-25)
Function old new delta
intel_guc_log_level_set 388 363 -25
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h | 16 +++++-----------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 11 +++--------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
index 4971685..72941bd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
@@ -534,17 +534,6 @@ struct guc_log_buffer_state {
u32 version;
} __packed;
-union guc_log_control {
- struct {
- u32 logging_enabled:1;
- u32 reserved1:3;
- u32 verbosity:4;
- u32 default_logging:1;
- u32 reserved2:23;
- };
- u32 value;
-} __packed;
-
struct guc_ctx_report {
u32 report_return_status;
u32 reserved1[64];
@@ -603,6 +592,11 @@ enum intel_guc_report_status {
INTEL_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_COMPLETE = 0x4,
};
+#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_LOGGING_ENABLED (1 << 0)
+#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT 4
+#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_MASK (0xF << GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT)
+#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_DEFAULT_LOGGING (1 << 8)
+
/*
* The GuC sends its response to a command by overwriting the
* command in SS0. The response is distinguishable from a command
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index 39928e6..c84b67f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -60,16 +60,11 @@ static int guc_action_flush_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
static int guc_action_control_log(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
bool default_logging, u32 verbosity)
{
- union guc_log_control control_val = {
- {
- .logging_enabled = enable,
- .verbosity = verbosity,
- .default_logging = default_logging,
- },
- };
u32 action[] = {
INTEL_GUC_ACTION_UK_LOG_ENABLE_LOGGING,
- control_val.value
+ (enable ? GUC_LOG_CONTROL_LOGGING_ENABLED : 0) |
+ (verbosity << GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT) |
+ (default_logging ? GUC_LOG_CONTROL_DEFAULT_LOGGING : 0)
};
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header
2018-03-19 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control Michal Wajdeczko
@ 2018-03-19 13:49 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 15:33 ` Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michał Winiarski
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michal Wajdeczko @ 2018-03-19 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
While today we are modifying GuC enabled msg mask only in GuC
log, this code should be defined as generic GuC to allow future
code reuse.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 9a95d15..13f3d1d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -155,4 +155,18 @@ static inline int intel_guc_sanitize(struct intel_guc *guc)
return 0;
}
+static inline void intel_guc_enable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
+ guc->msg_enabled_mask |= mask;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void intel_guc_disable_msg(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 mask)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
+ guc->msg_enabled_mask &= ~mask;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index c84b67f..49aeaae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -70,25 +70,23 @@ static int guc_action_control_log(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
}
-static void guc_flush_log_msg_enable(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static inline struct intel_guc *log_to_guc(struct intel_guc_log *log)
{
- spin_lock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
- guc->msg_enabled_mask |= INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER |
- INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED;
- spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
+ return container_of(log, struct intel_guc, log);
}
-static void guc_flush_log_msg_disable(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static void guc_log_enable_flush_events(struct intel_guc_log *log)
{
- spin_lock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
- guc->msg_enabled_mask &= ~(INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER |
- INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED);
- spin_unlock_irq(&guc->irq_lock);
+ intel_guc_enable_msg(log_to_guc(log),
+ INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER |
+ INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED);
}
-static inline struct intel_guc *log_to_guc(struct intel_guc_log *log)
+static void guc_log_disable_flush_events(struct intel_guc_log *log)
{
- return container_of(log, struct intel_guc, log);
+ intel_guc_disable_msg(log_to_guc(log),
+ INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_FLUSH_LOG_BUFFER |
+ INTEL_GUC_RECV_MSG_CRASH_DUMP_POSTED);
}
/*
@@ -575,7 +573,7 @@ int intel_guc_log_relay_open(struct intel_guc_log *log)
mutex_unlock(&log->relay.lock);
- guc_flush_log_msg_enable(log_to_guc(log));
+ guc_log_enable_flush_events(log);
/*
* When GuC is logging without us relaying to userspace, we're ignoring
@@ -615,7 +613,7 @@ void intel_guc_log_relay_flush(struct intel_guc_log *log)
void intel_guc_log_relay_close(struct intel_guc_log *log)
{
- guc_flush_log_msg_disable(log_to_guc(log));
+ guc_log_disable_flush_events(log);
flush_work(&log->relay.flush_work);
mutex_lock(&log->relay.lock);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
2018-03-19 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header Michal Wajdeczko
@ 2018-03-19 15:15 ` Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] " Patchwork
2018-03-19 19:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michał Winiarski @ 2018-03-19 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 01:49:22PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't
> operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC.
> Better to use guc_action prefix.
>
> v2: rebase + naming compromise
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
-Michał
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control Michal Wajdeczko
@ 2018-03-19 15:32 ` Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 15:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michał Winiarski @ 2018-03-19 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 01:49:23PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> Usually we use shift/mask macros for bit field definitions.
> Union guc_log_control was not following that pattern.
>
> Additional bonus:
>
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-25 (-25)
> Function old new delta
> intel_guc_log_level_set 388 363 -25
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h | 16 +++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 11 +++--------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
> index 4971685..72941bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
> @@ -534,17 +534,6 @@ struct guc_log_buffer_state {
> u32 version;
> } __packed;
>
> -union guc_log_control {
> - struct {
> - u32 logging_enabled:1;
> - u32 reserved1:3;
> - u32 verbosity:4;
> - u32 default_logging:1;
> - u32 reserved2:23;
> - };
> - u32 value;
> -} __packed;
> -
> struct guc_ctx_report {
> u32 report_return_status;
> u32 reserved1[64];
> @@ -603,6 +592,11 @@ enum intel_guc_report_status {
> INTEL_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_COMPLETE = 0x4,
> };
>
> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_LOGGING_ENABLED (1 << 0)
> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT 4
> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_MASK (0xF << GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT)
You're not using the mask anywhere. Is it just to describe the iface?
Or was it supposed to be used in guc_action_control_log?
(there's a slight change in behavior here, which may lead to confusion when
passing out-of-range verbosity)
-Michał
> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_DEFAULT_LOGGING (1 << 8)
> +
> /*
> * The GuC sends its response to a command by overwriting the
> * command in SS0. The response is distinguishable from a command
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
> index 39928e6..c84b67f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
> @@ -60,16 +60,11 @@ static int guc_action_flush_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
> static int guc_action_control_log(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
> bool default_logging, u32 verbosity)
> {
> - union guc_log_control control_val = {
> - {
> - .logging_enabled = enable,
> - .verbosity = verbosity,
> - .default_logging = default_logging,
> - },
> - };
> u32 action[] = {
> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_UK_LOG_ENABLE_LOGGING,
> - control_val.value
> + (enable ? GUC_LOG_CONTROL_LOGGING_ENABLED : 0) |
> + (verbosity << GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT) |
> + (default_logging ? GUC_LOG_CONTROL_DEFAULT_LOGGING : 0)
> };
>
> return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> --
> 1.9.1
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header Michal Wajdeczko
@ 2018-03-19 15:33 ` Michał Winiarski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michał Winiarski @ 2018-03-19 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 01:49:24PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> While today we are modifying GuC enabled msg mask only in GuC
> log, this code should be defined as generic GuC to allow future
> code reuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
-Michał
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control
2018-03-19 15:32 ` Michał Winiarski
@ 2018-03-19 15:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michal Wajdeczko @ 2018-03-19 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michał Winiarski; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:32:05 +0100, Michał Winiarski
<michal.winiarski@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 01:49:23PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> Usually we use shift/mask macros for bit field definitions.
>> Union guc_log_control was not following that pattern.
>>
>> Additional bonus:
>>
>> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-25 (-25)
>> Function old new delta
>> intel_guc_log_level_set 388 363 -25
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
>> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h | 16 +++++-----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 11 +++--------
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> index 4971685..72941bd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
>> @@ -534,17 +534,6 @@ struct guc_log_buffer_state {
>> u32 version;
>> } __packed;
>>
>> -union guc_log_control {
>> - struct {
>> - u32 logging_enabled:1;
>> - u32 reserved1:3;
>> - u32 verbosity:4;
>> - u32 default_logging:1;
>> - u32 reserved2:23;
>> - };
>> - u32 value;
>> -} __packed;
>> -
>> struct guc_ctx_report {
>> u32 report_return_status;
>> u32 reserved1[64];
>> @@ -603,6 +592,11 @@ enum intel_guc_report_status {
>> INTEL_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_COMPLETE = 0x4,
>> };
>>
>> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_LOGGING_ENABLED (1 << 0)
>> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT 4
>> +#define GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_MASK (0xF <<
>> GUC_LOG_CONTROL_VERBOSITY_SHIFT)
>
> You're not using the mask anywhere. Is it just to describe the iface?
yep, only bit-field interface
> Or was it supposed to be used in guc_action_control_log?
> (there's a slight change in behavior here, which may lead to confusion
> when
> passing out-of-range verbosity)
As you already check for out-of-range verbosity level passed by user:
if (val < GUC_LOG_LEVEL_DISABLED ||
val > GUC_VERBOSITY_TO_LOG_LEVEL(GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX))
return -EINVAL;
I can make my check in guc_action() more assertive:
GEM_BUG_ON(verbosity > GUC_LOG_VERBOSITY_MAX)
Thanks,
/m
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
2018-03-19 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michal Wajdeczko
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-19 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michał Winiarski
@ 2018-03-19 16:26 ` Patchwork
2018-03-19 19:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-03-19 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40190/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 40190v1 series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/40190/revisions/1/mbox/
---- Known issues:
Test gem_mmap_gtt:
Subgroup basic-small-bo-tiledx:
fail -> PASS (fi-gdg-551) fdo#102575
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
pass -> FAIL (fi-cfl-s2) fdo#100368
Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-snb-2520m) fdo#103713
fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
fi-bdw-5557u total:285 pass:264 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:429s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:285 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:445s
fi-blb-e6850 total:285 pass:220 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:64 time:385s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:285 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:534s
fi-bwr-2160 total:285 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:105 time:297s
fi-bxt-dsi total:285 pass:255 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:514s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:285 pass:256 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:512s
fi-byt-j1900 total:285 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:517s
fi-byt-n2820 total:285 pass:246 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:504s
fi-cfl-8700k total:285 pass:257 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:410s
fi-cfl-s2 total:285 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:26 time:573s
fi-cfl-u total:285 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:510s
fi-cnl-drrs total:285 pass:254 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:526s
fi-elk-e7500 total:285 pass:225 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:59 time:426s
fi-gdg-551 total:285 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:108 time:317s
fi-glk-1 total:285 pass:257 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:536s
fi-hsw-4770 total:285 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:406s
fi-ilk-650 total:285 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:427s
fi-ivb-3520m total:285 pass:256 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:473s
fi-ivb-3770 total:285 pass:252 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33 time:428s
fi-kbl-7500u total:285 pass:260 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:481s
fi-kbl-7567u total:285 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:465s
fi-kbl-r total:285 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:514s
fi-pnv-d510 total:285 pass:219 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:654s
fi-skl-6260u total:285 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:446s
fi-skl-6600u total:285 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:531s
fi-skl-6700hq total:285 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:540s
fi-skl-6700k2 total:285 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:508s
fi-skl-6770hq total:285 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:498s
fi-skl-guc total:285 pass:257 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:430s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:285 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:445s
fi-snb-2520m total:242 pass:208 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:33
fi-snb-2600 total:285 pass:245 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:399s
9b79492f331e36cf2e08d65ab3221abb66f67844 drm-tip: 2018y-03m-19d-14h-18m-12s UTC integration manifest
2d92dd0eb2bc drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header
811b8a5cc50f drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control
47e7b038230a drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8394/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
2018-03-19 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michal Wajdeczko
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-03-19 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] " Patchwork
@ 2018-03-19 19:26 ` Patchwork
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-03-19 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Wajdeczko; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2,1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/40190/
State : success
== Summary ==
---- Possible new issues:
Test pm_rc6_residency:
Subgroup rc6-accuracy:
skip -> PASS (shard-snb)
---- Known issues:
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup dpms-vs-vblank-race:
fail -> PASS (shard-hsw) fdo#103060
Test kms_sysfs_edid_timing:
warn -> PASS (shard-apl) fdo#100047
fdo#103060 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103060
fdo#100047 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100047
shard-apl total:3442 pass:1815 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:7 skip:1619 time:12953s
shard-hsw total:3442 pass:1768 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:1671 time:11956s
shard-snb total:3442 pass:1359 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:2080 time:7220s
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_8394/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-19 19:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-19 13:49 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Drop union guc_log_control Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 15:32 ` Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 15:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915/guc: Move enable/disable msg functions to GuC header Michal Wajdeczko
2018-03-19 15:33 ` Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions Michał Winiarski
2018-03-19 16:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/3] " Patchwork
2018-03-19 19:26 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.