* [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation"
@ 2018-09-06 21:36 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2018-09-06 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-wireless, Zhi Chen, Kalle Valo, ath10k
Hi Greg / stable maintainer(s),
IIUC, this commit is a good candidate for -stable. I just hit the bug on
4.14, because of new vendor firmware that noticed the mismatched length
(an internal "assert"), but it seems like this is equally problematic
from the kernel side for as long as this code existed [1]:
commit c8291988806407e02a01b4b15b4504eafbcc04e0
Author: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon Jun 18 17:00:39 2018 +0300
ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation
Thanks,
Brian
[1] I guess that would be:
Fixes: ca996ec56608 ("ath10k: implement wmi-tlv backend")
which was in v4.0.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation"
@ 2018-09-06 21:36 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2018-09-06 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Zhi Chen, ath10k, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, Kalle Valo
Hi Greg / stable maintainer(s),
IIUC, this commit is a good candidate for -stable. I just hit the bug on
4.14, because of new vendor firmware that noticed the mismatched length
(an internal "assert"), but it seems like this is equally problematic
from the kernel side for as long as this code existed [1]:
commit c8291988806407e02a01b4b15b4504eafbcc04e0
Author: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon Jun 18 17:00:39 2018 +0300
ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation
Thanks,
Brian
[1] I guess that would be:
Fixes: ca996ec56608 ("ath10k: implement wmi-tlv backend")
which was in v4.0.
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation"
2018-09-06 21:36 ` Brian Norris
@ 2018-09-11 14:47 ` Kalle Valo
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2018-09-11 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: stable, linux-kernel, linux-wireless, Zhi Chen, ath10k
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:
> Hi Greg / stable maintainer(s),
>
> IIUC, this commit is a good candidate for -stable. I just hit the bug on
> 4.14, because of new vendor firmware that noticed the mismatched length
> (an internal "assert"), but it seems like this is equally problematic
> from the kernel side for as long as this code existed [1]:
>
> commit c8291988806407e02a01b4b15b4504eafbcc04e0
> Author: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 18 17:00:39 2018 +0300
>
> ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> [1] I guess that would be:
>
> Fixes: ca996ec56608 ("ath10k: implement wmi-tlv backend")
>
> which was in v4.0.
FWIW:
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Thanks Brian!
--
Kalle Valo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation"
@ 2018-09-11 14:47 ` Kalle Valo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kalle Valo @ 2018-09-11 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: Zhi Chen, ath10k, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, stable
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:
> Hi Greg / stable maintainer(s),
>
> IIUC, this commit is a good candidate for -stable. I just hit the bug on
> 4.14, because of new vendor firmware that noticed the mismatched length
> (an internal "assert"), but it seems like this is equally problematic
> from the kernel side for as long as this code existed [1]:
>
> commit c8291988806407e02a01b4b15b4504eafbcc04e0
> Author: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 18 17:00:39 2018 +0300
>
> ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> [1] I guess that would be:
>
> Fixes: ca996ec56608 ("ath10k: implement wmi-tlv backend")
>
> which was in v4.0.
FWIW:
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Thanks Brian!
--
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation"
2018-09-06 21:36 ` Brian Norris
@ 2018-10-11 14:14 ` Greg KH
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2018-10-11 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris
Cc: stable, linux-kernel, linux-wireless, Zhi Chen, Kalle Valo, ath10k
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 02:36:22PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Greg / stable maintainer(s),
>
> IIUC, this commit is a good candidate for -stable. I just hit the bug on
> 4.14, because of new vendor firmware that noticed the mismatched length
> (an internal "assert"), but it seems like this is equally problematic
> from the kernel side for as long as this code existed [1]:
>
> commit c8291988806407e02a01b4b15b4504eafbcc04e0
> Author: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 18 17:00:39 2018 +0300
>
> ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> [1] I guess that would be:
>
> Fixes: ca996ec56608 ("ath10k: implement wmi-tlv backend")
>
> which was in v4.0.
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation"
@ 2018-10-11 14:14 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2018-10-11 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris
Cc: linux-wireless, linux-kernel, ath10k, Zhi Chen, stable, Kalle Valo
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 02:36:22PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Greg / stable maintainer(s),
>
> IIUC, this commit is a good candidate for -stable. I just hit the bug on
> 4.14, because of new vendor firmware that noticed the mismatched length
> (an internal "assert"), but it seems like this is equally problematic
> from the kernel side for as long as this code existed [1]:
>
> commit c8291988806407e02a01b4b15b4504eafbcc04e0
> Author: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Mon Jun 18 17:00:39 2018 +0300
>
> ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> [1] I guess that would be:
>
> Fixes: ca996ec56608 ("ath10k: implement wmi-tlv backend")
>
> which was in v4.0.
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-11 14:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-06 21:36 [for -stable] commit "c82919888064 ath10k: fix scan crash due to incorrect length calculation" Brian Norris
2018-09-06 21:36 ` Brian Norris
2018-09-11 14:47 ` Kalle Valo
2018-09-11 14:47 ` Kalle Valo
2018-10-11 14:14 ` Greg KH
2018-10-11 14:14 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.