From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:14:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307121400.cmgymfbphguvlaoo@queper01-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307095750.GD29753@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday 07 Mar 2019 at 10:57:50 (+0100), Juri Lelli wrote:
> If people think it's best to simply make this RO, I won't be against it.
> Just pointed out a conversation we recently had. Guess we could also
> make it RW again (properly) in the future if somebody complains.
Right, now is probably the time to give it a go before folks start
depending on it. And if I am wrong (and that happens more often than I'd
like unfortunately :-)) and there are users of that thing, then the
revert should be trivial.
Thanks,
Quentin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 12:14:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307121400.cmgymfbphguvlaoo@queper01-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307095750.GD29753@localhost.localdomain>
On Thursday 07 Mar 2019 at 10:57:50 (+0100), Juri Lelli wrote:
> If people think it's best to simply make this RO, I won't be against it.
> Just pointed out a conversation we recently had. Guess we could also
> make it RW again (properly) in the future if somebody complains.
Right, now is probably the time to give it a go before folks start
depending on it. And if I am wrong (and that happens more often than I'd
like unfortunately :-)) and there are users of that thing, then the
revert should be trivial.
Thanks,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 11:53 [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-02-28 12:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 14:38 ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-02-28 15:25 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-02 13:30 ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-03-04 18:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 9:23 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 11:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 11:29 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 11:36 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-05 15:53 ` Chandra Sekhar Lingutla
2019-03-05 16:12 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-05 16:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-06 15:22 ` Morten Rasmussen
2019-03-06 15:27 ` [PATCH v1] arch_topology: Make cpu_capacity sysfs node as ready-only Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-06 15:27 ` Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-07 7:28 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 7:28 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 9:31 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 9:31 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 9:57 ` Juri Lelli
2019-03-07 12:14 ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2019-03-07 12:14 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-07 15:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-07 15:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-08 11:45 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-03-08 11:45 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-03-08 12:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-08 12:38 ` Lingutla Chandrasekhar
2019-03-27 10:56 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-27 10:56 ` Quentin Perret
2019-03-06 9:48 ` [PATCH] arch_topology: Update user supplied capacity to possible cpus in cluster Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190307121400.cmgymfbphguvlaoo@queper01-lin \
--to=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=clingutla@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.