All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Daniel Wang <wonderfly@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:27:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190314092727.m37frq3jszz6mh4g@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190313092759.GA10060@jagdpanzerIV>

On Wed 2019-03-13 18:27:59, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (03/13/19 09:40), Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> > On 2019-03-13 09:19:32 [+0100], John Ogness wrote:
> > > recursive situation. As you are pointing out, the notification/wake
> > > component of printk_safe will still be needed. I will leave that (small)
> > > part in printk_safe.c.
> > 
> > Does this mean we keep irq_work part or we bury it and solve it by other
> > means?
>
> *May be* we can take a closer look and find cases when ->atomic
> consoles don't really depend on console_sem. And *may be* we can
> split the console drivers list and somehow forbid removal and
> modification (ioctl) of ->atomic consoles under us. Assuming that
> this is doable we then can start iterating ->atomic consoles list
> with unlocked console_sem.

I believe that this is actually the plan. Atomic consoles depending
on console_sem would not be a real step forward.


> Non->atomic consoles or consoles which depend on console_sem (VT,
> fbcon and so on) will stay in another list, and we will take
> console_sem before we iterate that list and invoke those drivers.

This might be also needed for "less" important messages
that people would not want to get to the console atomically
because it would serialize CPUs and slow down the entire
system.

I think that we would still need irq_work for this mode.
But it should be necessary only for messages from NMI context
and printk() recursion. It means that it should be a rare
situation and the amount of messages should get limited.
It should not be much worse than handling few printk()
calls from any irq handler.

Best Regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-14  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 149+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12 14:29 [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/25] printk-rb: add printk ring buffer documentation John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:45   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/25] printk-rb: add prb locking functions John Ogness
2019-02-13 15:45   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-13 21:39     ` John Ogness
2019-02-14 10:33       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-14 12:10         ` John Ogness
2019-02-15 10:26           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-15 10:56             ` John Ogness
2019-03-07  2:12   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/25] printk-rb: define ring buffer struct and initializer John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:46   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-14 12:46     ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/25] printk-rb: add writer interface John Ogness
2019-02-14 15:16   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-14 23:36     ` John Ogness
2019-02-15  1:19       ` John Ogness
2019-02-15 13:47       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-17  1:32         ` John Ogness
2019-02-21 13:51           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/25] printk-rb: add basic non-blocking reading interface John Ogness
2019-02-18 12:54   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 21:44     ` John Ogness
2019-02-21 16:22       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/25] printk-rb: add blocking reader support John Ogness
2019-02-18 14:05   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 21:47     ` John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/25] printk-rb: add functionality required by printk John Ogness
2019-02-12 17:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-02-13  9:20     ` John Ogness
2019-02-18 15:59   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-19 22:08     ` John Ogness
2019-02-22  9:58       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/25] printk: add ring buffer and kthread John Ogness
2019-02-12 15:47   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-19 13:54   ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-04  7:38   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-04 10:00     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-04 11:07       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-05 21:00         ` John Ogness
2019-03-06 15:57           ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-06 21:17             ` John Ogness
2019-03-06 22:22               ` John Ogness
2019-03-07  6:41                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-07  6:51                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-07 12:50               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-07  5:15           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-11 10:51             ` John Ogness
2019-03-12  9:58               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12 10:30               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-07 12:06     ` John Ogness
2019-03-08  1:31       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-08 10:04         ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/25] printk: remove exclusive console hack John Ogness
2019-02-19 14:03   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/25] printk: redirect emit/store to new ringbuffer John Ogness
2019-02-20  9:01   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-20 21:25     ` John Ogness
2019-02-22 14:43       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-22 15:06         ` John Ogness
2019-02-22 15:25           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-25 12:11       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-25 16:41         ` John Ogness
2019-02-26  9:45           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/25] printk_safe: remove printk safe code John Ogness
2019-02-22 10:37   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-22 10:37     ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-22 13:38     ` John Ogness
2019-02-22 15:15       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/25] printk: minimize console locking implementation John Ogness
2019-02-25 13:44   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/25] printk: track seq per console John Ogness
2019-02-25 14:59   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-26  8:45     ` John Ogness
2019-02-26 13:11       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/25] printk: do boot_delay_msec inside printk_delay John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/25] printk: print history for new consoles John Ogness
2019-02-26 14:58   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-26 15:22     ` John Ogness
2019-02-27  9:02       ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-27 10:02         ` John Ogness
2019-02-27 13:12           ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-04  9:24       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/25] printk: implement CON_PRINTBUFFER John Ogness
2019-02-26 15:38   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/25] printk: add processor number to output John Ogness
2019-02-13 22:29   ` John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/25] console: add write_atomic interface John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/25] printk: introduce emergency messages John Ogness
2019-03-07  7:30   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-08 10:31     ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-11 12:04       ` John Ogness
2019-03-12  2:51         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12  2:58       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/25] serial: 8250: implement write_atomic John Ogness
2019-02-27  9:46   ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-27 10:32     ` John Ogness
2019-02-27 13:55       ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-08  4:05         ` John Ogness
2019-03-08  4:17           ` John Ogness
2019-03-08 10:28           ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-12 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/25] printk: implement KERN_CONT John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/25] printk: implement /dev/kmsg John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/25] printk: implement syslog John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/25] printk: implement kmsg_dump John Ogness
2019-02-12 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/25] printk: remove unused code John Ogness
2019-03-08 14:02   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-11  2:46     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-11  8:18       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-12  9:38         ` Petr Mladek
2019-02-13  1:31 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 13:43   ` John Ogness
2019-03-04  6:39     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13  1:41 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 14:15   ` John Ogness
2019-03-04  5:31     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13  2:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 14:43   ` John Ogness
2019-03-04  5:23     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-07  9:53       ` John Ogness
2019-03-08 10:00         ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-11 10:54         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12 12:38           ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-12 15:15             ` John Ogness
2019-03-13  2:15               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-13  8:19                 ` John Ogness
2019-03-13  8:40                   ` Sebastian Siewior
2019-03-13  9:27                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-13 10:06                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14  9:27                       ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2019-03-13  8:46                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-14  9:14               ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-14  9:35                 ` John Ogness
2019-03-13  2:00             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-02-13 16:54 ` David Laight
2019-02-13 22:20   ` John Ogness
2019-02-13 22:20     ` John Ogness
2020-01-20 23:05 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-21 23:56   ` John Ogness
2020-01-22  2:34     ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-22  7:31       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-22 16:58         ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-22 19:48           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-24 16:09             ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-27 12:32               ` Petr Mladek
2020-01-27 13:45                 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2020-01-22 10:33       ` John Ogness
2020-01-24 12:13         ` Eugeniu Rosca

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190314092727.m37frq3jszz6mh4g@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wonderfly@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.