colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 602 bytes --]

Hi Sir/Madam:

I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.

Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
Libdrm package:  2.4.97

When calling function
properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);
 it only returns only one property:

This property is:
  property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4
It looks like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.

>From what kernel version , the Baytrail GPU DRM driver starts to support colorkey, and is there a kernel patch available?

Thanks,

Jim


Caterpillar: Confidential Green

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3905 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Hi Sir/Madam:
> 
> I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> 
> Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> 
> When calling function
> properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);
>  it only returns only one property:
> 
> This property is:
>   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4
> It looks like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.

There are two problems currently:
- Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
  patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
  https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43902/
- Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
  (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
  a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
  a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
  its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
  with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
  updates.

So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

RE: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

Villie:

What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?

Thanks,

Jim


Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Hi Sir/Madam:
> 
> I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> 
> Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> 
> When calling function
> properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> 
> This property is:
>   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like that 
> the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.

There are two problems currently:
- Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
  patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
  https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freedesktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
- Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
  (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
  a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
  a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
  its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
  with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
  updates.

So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Villie:
> 
> What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?

There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case
for it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)

> If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?

No. We would need to define a new api for it.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > 
> > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > 
> > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > 
> > When calling function
> > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > 
> > This property is:
> >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like that 
> > the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> 
> There are two problems currently:
> - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
>   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
>   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freedesktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
>   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
>   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
>   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
>   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
>   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
>   updates.
> 
> So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Villie:
> > 
> > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> 
> There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case
> for it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> 
> > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> 
> No. We would need to define a new api for it.

I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before
turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change
the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may
not even need an atomic api for this.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > 
> > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > 
> > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > 
> > > When calling function
> > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > 
> > > This property is:
> > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like that 
> > > the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > 
> > There are two problems currently:
> > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> >   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freedesktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> >   updates.
> > 
> > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

Nice, do you have any sample code for it?

Thanks,

Jim


Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Villie:
> > 
> > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> 
> There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for it 
> I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> 
> > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> 
> No. We would need to define a new api for it.

I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > 
> > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > 
> > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > 
> > > When calling function
> > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > 
> > > This property is:
> > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like 
> > > that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > 
> > There are two problems currently:
> > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> >   
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freed
> > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-s
> > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9
> > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50
> > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> >   updates.
> > 
> > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedesktop
> .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m
> 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=Oyn
> sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzkzNPQ
> cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my requirement

Thanks,

Jim


Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Villie:
> > 
> > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> 
> There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for it 
> I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> 
> > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> 
> No. We would need to define a new api for it.

I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > 
> > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > 
> > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > 
> > > When calling function
> > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > 
> > > This property is:
> > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like 
> > > that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > 
> > There are two problems currently:
> > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> >   
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freed
> > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-s
> > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9
> > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50
> > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> >   updates.
> > 
> > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedesktop
> .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m
> 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=Oyn
> sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzkzNPQ
> cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:59:21PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Nice, do you have any sample code for it?

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/tree/src/sna/sna_video_sprite.c
is the only userspace code we have that uses the colorkey.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Villie:
> > > 
> > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > 
> > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for it 
> > I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > 
> > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > 
> > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> 
> I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Jim
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > 
> > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > 
> > > > When calling function
> > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > 
> > > > This property is:
> > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like 
> > > > that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > 
> > > There are two problems currently:
> > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > >   
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freed
> > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-s
> > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9
> > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50
> > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > >   updates.
> > > 
> > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedesktop
> > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m
> > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=Oyn
> > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzkzNPQ
> > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:14:49PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my requirement

Not atomically with other updates.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Villie:
> > > 
> > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > 
> > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for it 
> > I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > 
> > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > 
> > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> 
> I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Jim
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > 
> > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > 
> > > > When calling function
> > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > 
> > > > This property is:
> > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks like 
> > > > that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > 
> > > There are two problems currently:
> > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > >   
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.freed
> > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg-s
> > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUCy9
> > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo50
> > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > >   updates.
> > > 
> > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedesktop
> > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m
> > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=Oyn
> > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzkzNPQ
> > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

What about if I disable interrupt when changing the colorkey?  This will solve the atomic issue.  I think we only change colorkey or enable/disable colorkey once a while. If disabling interrupt work, I will disable interrupt and change colorkey. That performance affection could be acceptable

Thanks

Jim

Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:19 AM
To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:14:49PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? 
> If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my 
> requirement

Not atomically with other updates.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Villie:
> > > 
> > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > 
> > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for 
> > it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > 
> > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > 
> > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> 
> I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Jim
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; 
> > > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > 
> > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > 
> > > > When calling function
> > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > 
> > > > This property is:
> > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks 
> > > > like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > 
> > > There are two problems currently:
> > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > >   
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.fre
> > > ed 
> > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg
> > > -s
> > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUC
> > > y9
> > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo
> > > 50
> > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > >   updates.
> > > 
> > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedeskt
> > op 
> > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r
> > 4m 
> > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=O
> > yn 
> > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzkzN
> > PQ
> > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:24:03PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> What about if I disable interrupt when changing the colorkey?  This will solve the atomic issue.  I think we only change colorkey or enable/disable colorkey once a while. If disabling interrupt work, I will disable interrupt and change colorkey. That performance affection could be acceptable

Interrupts don't matter for this.

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:19 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:14:49PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? 
> > If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my 
> > requirement
> 
> Not atomically with other updates.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > Villie:
> > > > 
> > > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > > 
> > > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for 
> > > it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > > 
> > > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > > 
> > > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> > 
> > I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Jim
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; 
> > > > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > > 
> > > > > When calling function
> > > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > > 
> > > > > This property is:
> > > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks 
> > > > > like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > > 
> > > > There are two problems currently:
> > > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > > >   
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.fre
> > > > ed 
> > > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9OlGg
> > > > -s
> > > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfgUC
> > > > y9
> > > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3pXo
> > > > 50
> > > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > > >   updates.
> > > > 
> > > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedeskt
> > > op 
> > > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r
> > > 4m 
> > > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=O
> > > yn 
> > > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzkzN
> > > PQ
> > > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

If I go with pre-configured colorkey, do I need port your kernel patch to i915 driver at kernel 3.10.61 ?

Thanks,

Jim



Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 10:02 AM
To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:24:03PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> What about if I disable interrupt when changing the colorkey?  This 
> will solve the atomic issue.  I think we only change colorkey or 
> enable/disable colorkey once a while. If disabling interrupt work, I 
> will disable interrupt and change colorkey. That performance affection 
> could be acceptable

Interrupts don't matter for this.

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:19 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:14:49PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? 
> > If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my 
> > requirement
> 
> Not atomically with other updates.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > Villie:
> > > > 
> > > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > > 
> > > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for 
> > > it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > > 
> > > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > > 
> > > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> > 
> > I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Jim
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; 
> > > > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > > 
> > > > > When calling function
> > > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > > 
> > > > > This property is:
> > > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks 
> > > > > like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > > 
> > > > There are two problems currently:
> > > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > > >   
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.f
> > > > re
> > > > ed
> > > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9Ol
> > > > Gg
> > > > -s
> > > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfg
> > > > UC
> > > > y9
> > > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3p
> > > > Xo
> > > > 50
> > > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > > >   updates.
> > > > 
> > > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedes
> > > kt
> > > op
> > > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB
> > > 4r
> > > 4m
> > > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m
> > > =O
> > > yn
> > > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzk
> > > zN
> > > PQ
> > > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Jim Zhang]

Ville:

Yes, if this patch is needed by kernel 3.10.61,  please get somebody to review it.  What do I need do to speed up the review process?
Please generate a patch against kernel 3.10.61 if possible.

Thanks,

Jim


Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Zhang 
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 10:18 AM
To: 'Ville Syrjälä' <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

If I go with pre-configured colorkey, do I need port your kernel patch to i915 driver at kernel 3.10.61 ?

Thanks,

Jim



Caterpillar: Confidential Green

-----Original Message-----
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 10:02 AM
To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:24:03PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> What about if I disable interrupt when changing the colorkey?  This 
> will solve the atomic issue.  I think we only change colorkey or 
> enable/disable colorkey once a while. If disabling interrupt work, I 
> will disable interrupt and change colorkey. That performance affection 
> could be acceptable

Interrupts don't matter for this.

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:19 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:14:49PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? 
> > If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my 
> > requirement
> 
> Not atomically with other updates.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > Villie:
> > > > 
> > > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > > 
> > > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for 
> > > it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > > 
> > > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > > 
> > > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> > 
> > I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Jim
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; 
> > > > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > > 
> > > > > When calling function
> > > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > > 
> > > > > This property is:
> > > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks 
> > > > > like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > > 
> > > > There are two problems currently:
> > > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > > >   
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.f
> > > > re
> > > > ed
> > > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9Ol
> > > > Gg
> > > > -s
> > > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfg
> > > > UC
> > > > y9
> > > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3p
> > > > Xo
> > > > 50
> > > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > > >   updates.
> > > > 
> > > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedes
> > > kt
> > > op
> > > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB
> > > 4r
> > > 4m
> > > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m
> > > =O
> > > yn
> > > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzk
> > > zN
> > > PQ
> > > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:15:20PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> Ville:
> 
> Yes, if this patch is needed by kernel 3.10.61,  please get somebody to review it.  What do I need do to speed up the review process?
> Please generate a patch against kernel 3.10.61 if possible.

3.10 is so ancient I don't even remember what it contains. I have
a feeling it's pre-atomic, in which case there is no point in even
thinking about a backport. It would simply be too painful.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Zhang 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 10:18 AM
> To: 'Ville Syrjälä' <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> If I go with pre-configured colorkey, do I need port your kernel patch to i915 driver at kernel 3.10.61 ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 10:02 AM
> To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:24:03PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > What about if I disable interrupt when changing the colorkey?  This 
> > will solve the atomic issue.  I think we only change colorkey or 
> > enable/disable colorkey once a while. If disabling interrupt work, I 
> > will disable interrupt and change colorkey. That performance affection 
> > could be acceptable
> 
> Interrupts don't matter for this.
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Jim
> > 
> > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 9:19 AM
> > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > 
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 02:14:49PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > Once I pre-configure the colorkey, am I able to enable and disable it? 
> > > If colorkey can be enabled/disabled after that might meet my 
> > > requirement
> > 
> > Not atomically with other updates.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Jim
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 8:57 AM
> > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 04:46:24PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 01:29:41PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Villie:
> > > > > 
> > > > > What is Intel's plan for the colorkey patch?   Does Intel have any plan to review and release?
> > > > 
> > > > There is no real plan at this time. But if you have a use case for 
> > > > it I can try to harass people until someone reviews it :)
> > > > 
> > > > > If I go with custom ioctl, and my custom ioctl will only used in Baytrail product, could it be atomic for Baytrail only?
> > > > 
> > > > No. We would need to define a new api for it.
> > > 
> > > I should clarify that you can pre-configure the colorkey before turning on the sprite plane(s). So unless you really need to change the colorkey while the sprite plane(s) are already enabled you may not even need an atomic api for this.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Jim
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Caterpillar: Confidential Green
> > > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 7:32 AM
> > > > > To: Jim Zhang <Zhang_Jim@cat.com>
> > > > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; 
> > > > > intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: colorkey support for intel i915 gpu driver
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 08:18:13PM +0000, Jim Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Sir/Madam:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I am using the open source Baytrail gpu drm driver.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Linux kernel version 3.10.61:
> > > > > > Libdrm package:  2.4.97
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > When calling function
> > > > > > properties = drmModeObjectGetProperties(drmfd, plane_id, 
> > > > > > DRM_MODE_OBJECT_PLANE);  it only returns only one property:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This property is:
> > > > > >   property->name = "rotation", property->prop_id =4 It looks 
> > > > > > like that the Baytrail gpu drm driver does not support colorkey.
> > > > > 
> > > > > There are two problems currently:
> > > > > - Destination colorkey is not implemented on BYT/CHV. I have
> > > > >   patches for it but they have not been reviewed by anyone:
> > > > >   
> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.f
> > > > > re
> > > > > ed
> > > > > esktop.org_series_43902_&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB4r4m9Ol
> > > > > Gg
> > > > > -s
> > > > > Ep8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m=ztfg
> > > > > UC
> > > > > y9
> > > > > ePzHa0zagoDF75AfJJVbElfjXUWmbpBRM58&s=aXK10RLMgC4i_nBRGS6Jzzbv3p
> > > > > Xo
> > > > > 50
> > > > > PX79myDO5gEYA&e=
> > > > > - Colorkey can only be set via a custom i915 specific ioctl
> > > > >   (DRM_I915_SET_SPRITE_COLORKEY). There have been a few attempts at
> > > > >   a generic property based API that never really went anywhere. It's
> > > > >   a rather difficult problem making this generic as each hardware has
> > > > >   its own peculiar way of specifying colorkeying. The main problem
> > > > >   with the custom ioctl is that it's not atomic with other screen
> > > > >   updates.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So, what kind of use case do you have in mind?
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > > Intel
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.freedes
> > > > kt
> > > > op
> > > > .org_mailman_listinfo_intel-2Dgfx&d=DwIDAw&c=p0oa49nxxGtbbM2qgM-GB
> > > > 4r
> > > > 4m
> > > > 9OlGg-sEp8sXylY2aQ&r=kszNssoSc2KF2GeTYwo7za6kdvLoemctuEIYtXbA4PI&m
> > > > =O
> > > > yn
> > > > sqGRzmnTMX2pxog1nBd_nnCa413-CM6loSIjLXXo&s=fjXVFmFDB_LEKe_W5PHzmzk
> > > > zN
> > > > PQ
> > > > cu3xTPSCqb5Dnpwk&e=
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > Intel
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> 
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx