All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: gregKH@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Subject: UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:20:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429122026.4249-1-oneukum@suse.com> (raw)

This is the UAS version of

747668dbc061b3e62bc1982767a3a1f9815fcf0e
usb-storage: Set virt_boundary_mask to avoid SG overflows

We are not as likely to be vulnerable as storage, as it is unlikelier
that UAS is run over a controller without native support for SG,
but the issue exists.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
---
 drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
index 6d71b8fff9df..ec9c1c7bb156 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
@@ -789,24 +789,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 {
 	struct uas_dev_info *devinfo =
 		(struct uas_dev_info *)sdev->host->hostdata;
+	int maxp;
 
 	sdev->hostdata = devinfo;
 
 	/*
-	 * USB has unusual DMA-alignment requirements: Although the
-	 * starting address of each scatter-gather element doesn't matter,
-	 * the length of each element except the last must be divisible
-	 * by the Bulk maxpacket value.  There's currently no way to
-	 * express this by block-layer constraints, so we'll cop out
-	 * and simply require addresses to be aligned at 512-byte
-	 * boundaries.  This is okay since most block I/O involves
-	 * hardware sectors that are multiples of 512 bytes in length,
-	 * and since host controllers up through USB 2.0 have maxpacket
-	 * values no larger than 512.
-	 *
-	 * But it doesn't suffice for Wireless USB, where Bulk maxpacket
-	 * values can be as large as 2048.  To make that work properly
-	 * will require changes to the block layer.
+	 * USB has unusual scatter-gather requirements: the length of each
+	 * scatterlist element except the last must be divisible by the
+	 * Bulk maxpacket value.  Fortunately this value is always a
+	 * power of 2.  Inform the block layer about this requirement.
+	 */
+
+	maxp = usb_maxpacket(devinfo->udev, devinfo->data_in_pipe, 0);
+	blk_queue_virt_boundary(sdev->request_queue, maxp - 1);
+
+	/*
+	 * This one is for the controllers. We assume 512 is always good.
 	 */
 	blk_queue_update_dma_alignment(sdev->request_queue, (512 - 1));
 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: gregKH@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH] UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:20:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429122026.4249-1-oneukum@suse.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190429122026.6ms-KFpgxuWcobiJD0Iaooa16ni6T0N4nZI1oxA45DI@z> (raw)

This is the UAS version of

747668dbc061b3e62bc1982767a3a1f9815fcf0e
usb-storage: Set virt_boundary_mask to avoid SG overflows

We are not as likely to be vulnerable as storage, as it is unlikelier
that UAS is run over a controller without native support for SG,
but the issue exists.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
---
 drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
index 6d71b8fff9df..ec9c1c7bb156 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
@@ -789,24 +789,22 @@ static int uas_slave_alloc(struct scsi_device *sdev)
 {
 	struct uas_dev_info *devinfo =
 		(struct uas_dev_info *)sdev->host->hostdata;
+	int maxp;
 
 	sdev->hostdata = devinfo;
 
 	/*
-	 * USB has unusual DMA-alignment requirements: Although the
-	 * starting address of each scatter-gather element doesn't matter,
-	 * the length of each element except the last must be divisible
-	 * by the Bulk maxpacket value.  There's currently no way to
-	 * express this by block-layer constraints, so we'll cop out
-	 * and simply require addresses to be aligned at 512-byte
-	 * boundaries.  This is okay since most block I/O involves
-	 * hardware sectors that are multiples of 512 bytes in length,
-	 * and since host controllers up through USB 2.0 have maxpacket
-	 * values no larger than 512.
-	 *
-	 * But it doesn't suffice for Wireless USB, where Bulk maxpacket
-	 * values can be as large as 2048.  To make that work properly
-	 * will require changes to the block layer.
+	 * USB has unusual scatter-gather requirements: the length of each
+	 * scatterlist element except the last must be divisible by the
+	 * Bulk maxpacket value.  Fortunately this value is always a
+	 * power of 2.  Inform the block layer about this requirement.
+	 */
+
+	maxp = usb_maxpacket(devinfo->udev, devinfo->data_in_pipe, 0);
+	blk_queue_virt_boundary(sdev->request_queue, maxp - 1);
+
+	/*
+	 * This one is for the controllers. We assume 512 is always good.
 	 */
 	blk_queue_update_dma_alignment(sdev->request_queue, (512 - 1));
 
-- 
2.16.4


             reply	other threads:[~2019-04-29 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-29 12:20 Oliver Neukum [this message]
2019-04-29 12:20 ` [PATCH] UAS: fix alignment of scatter/gather segments Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 13:31 David Laight
2019-04-29 13:31 ` [PATCH] " David Laight
2019-04-29 13:38 Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 13:38 ` [PATCH] " Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 14:19 David Laight
2019-04-29 14:19 ` [PATCH] " David Laight
2019-04-29 14:32 Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 14:32 ` [PATCH] " Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 15:06 David Laight
2019-04-29 15:06 ` [PATCH] " David Laight
2019-04-29 15:57 Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 15:57 ` [PATCH] " Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 16:08 Alan Stern
2019-04-29 16:08 ` [PATCH] " Alan Stern
2019-04-29 16:58 Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 16:58 ` [PATCH] " Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 17:55 Alan Stern
2019-04-29 17:55 ` [PATCH] " Alan Stern
2019-04-29 18:42 Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 18:42 ` [PATCH] " Oliver Neukum
2019-04-29 19:42 Alan Stern
2019-04-29 19:42 ` [PATCH] " Alan Stern
2019-04-30  9:16 David Laight
2019-04-30  9:16 ` [PATCH] " David Laight
2019-04-30 14:39 Alan Stern
2019-04-30 14:39 ` [PATCH] " Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190429122026.4249-1-oneukum@suse.com \
    --to=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=gregKH@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.