From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
soc@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Teichmann <lists@peter-teichmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:44:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190812094456.GI10598@jirafa.cyrius.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA9_cmdDbBm0ookyqGJMcyLVFHkYHuR3mEeawQKS2UqYJoWWaQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [2019-08-09 11:34]:
> > Earlier versions of OpenWRT and Debian both had support for iop32x
> > but not the others, and they both dropped iop32x as well in their 2015
> > releases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > I'm just guessing that iop32x is still needed, and the other two are
> > not. If anyone disagrees with that assessment, let me know so we
> > can come up with an alternative approach.
>
> I'm not sure who would scream if iop32x support went away as well, but
> I have not followed this space in years hence copying Martin.
I believe iop13xx were mostly Intel dev boards. I'm not aware of any
major devices based on iop33x.
As Arnd points out, Debian used to have support for various iop32x
devices. While Debian hasn't supported iop32x in a number of years,
these devices are still usable and in use (RMK being a prime example).
So I think it's safe to drop iop33x/iop13xx while retaining support
for iop32x.
As I was looking at my email archives, I saw an email from Peter
Teichmann who was working on an iop33x based platform (around 2009) so
I've copied him as well.
> In any event:
>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
--
Martin Michlmayr
https://www.cyrius.com/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Teichmann <lists@peter-teichmann.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
soc@kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 11:44:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190812094456.GI10598@jirafa.cyrius.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA9_cmdDbBm0ookyqGJMcyLVFHkYHuR3mEeawQKS2UqYJoWWaQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> [2019-08-09 11:34]:
> > Earlier versions of OpenWRT and Debian both had support for iop32x
> > but not the others, and they both dropped iop32x as well in their 2015
> > releases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > I'm just guessing that iop32x is still needed, and the other two are
> > not. If anyone disagrees with that assessment, let me know so we
> > can come up with an alternative approach.
>
> I'm not sure who would scream if iop32x support went away as well, but
> I have not followed this space in years hence copying Martin.
I believe iop13xx were mostly Intel dev boards. I'm not aware of any
major devices based on iop33x.
As Arnd points out, Debian used to have support for various iop32x
devices. While Debian hasn't supported iop32x in a number of years,
these devices are still usable and in use (RMK being a prime example).
So I think it's safe to drop iop33x/iop13xx while retaining support
for iop32x.
As I was looking at my email archives, I saw an email from Peter
Teichmann who was working on an iop33x based platform (around 2009) so
I've copied him as well.
> In any event:
>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
--
Martin Michlmayr
https://www.cyrius.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-12 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-09 16:29 [PATCH 0/7] ARM: preparation for multiplatform iop32x Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] dma: iop-adma: include prefetch.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-13 4:33 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-13 4:33 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-14 15:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-14 15:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] dma: iop-adma: use correct printk format strings Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-13 4:33 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-13 4:33 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] dma: iop-adma: allow building without platform headers Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: xscale: fix multi-cpu compilation Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-23 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-23 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: iop32x: make mach/uncompress.h independent of mach/hardware.h Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: iop32x: merge everything into mach-iop32x/ Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-09 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Wolfram Sang
2019-08-09 16:57 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-08-09 18:34 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-09 18:34 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-09 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-09 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-09 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-09 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-12 9:44 ` Martin Michlmayr [this message]
2019-08-12 9:44 ` Martin Michlmayr
2019-08-14 8:36 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-14 8:36 ` Linus Walleij
2019-08-14 10:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-14 10:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-08-16 15:42 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-08-16 15:42 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-08-16 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-16 15:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-08-16 16:15 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-08-16 16:15 ` Aaro Koskinen
2019-08-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 0/7] ARM: preparation for multiplatform iop32x Lennert Buytenhek
2019-08-15 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190812094456.GI10598@jirafa.cyrius.com \
--to=tbm@cyrius.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lists@peter-teichmann.de \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.