All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:19:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114131911.11783-1-david@redhat.com>

Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0.
Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages().

Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/page-isolation.h |  4 ++--
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  2 +-
 mm/page_alloc.c                | 21 +++++++--------------
 mm/page_isolation.c            |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index 6861df759fad..148e65a9c606 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype)
 #define MEMORY_OFFLINE	0x1
 #define REPORT_FAILURE	0x2
 
-bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
-			 int migratetype, int flags);
+bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
+			 int flags);
 void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype);
 int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
 				int migratetype, int *num_movable);
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 3b5cee4d3f4e..f06d33748607 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(unsigned long pfn)
 	if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
 		return false;
 
-	return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
+	return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
 				    MEMORY_OFFLINE);
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f5ecbacb0e04..e4d8f3a1a6b6 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -8270,17 +8270,15 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
 
 /*
  * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not.
- * If @count is not zero, it is okay to include less @count unmovable pages
  *
  * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that
  * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable
  * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at
  * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
  */
-bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
-			 int migratetype, int flags)
+bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
+			 int flags)
 {
-	unsigned long found;
 	unsigned long iter = 0;
 	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
 	const char *reason = "unmovable page";
@@ -8306,13 +8304,11 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
 		goto unmovable;
 	}
 
-	for (found = 0; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
-		unsigned long check = pfn + iter;
-
-		if (!pfn_valid_within(check))
+	for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
+		if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn + iter))
 			continue;
 
-		page = pfn_to_page(check);
+		page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
 
 		if (PageReserved(page))
 			goto unmovable;
@@ -8361,11 +8357,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
 		if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page))
 			continue;
 
-		if (__PageMovable(page))
+		if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page))
 			continue;
 
-		if (!PageLRU(page))
-			found++;
 		/*
 		 * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
 		 * it.  But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
@@ -8379,8 +8373,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
 		 * is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel
 		 * page at boot.
 		 */
-		if (found > count)
-			goto unmovable;
+		goto unmovable;
 	}
 	return false;
 unmovable:
diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index 21af88b718aa..1f8b9dfecbe8 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_
 	 * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself.
 	 * We just check MOVABLE pages.
 	 */
-	if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
+	if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
 		unsigned long nr_pages;
 		int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
 
-- 
2.21.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
	Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 14:19:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114131911.11783-1-david@redhat.com>

Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0.
Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages().

Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/page-isolation.h |  4 ++--
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            |  2 +-
 mm/page_alloc.c                | 21 +++++++--------------
 mm/page_isolation.c            |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
index 6861df759fad..148e65a9c606 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype)
 #define MEMORY_OFFLINE	0x1
 #define REPORT_FAILURE	0x2
 
-bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
-			 int migratetype, int flags);
+bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
+			 int flags);
 void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype);
 int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
 				int migratetype, int *num_movable);
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 3b5cee4d3f4e..f06d33748607 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_nolock(unsigned long pfn)
 	if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn))
 		return false;
 
-	return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
+	return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE,
 				    MEMORY_OFFLINE);
 }
 
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f5ecbacb0e04..e4d8f3a1a6b6 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -8270,17 +8270,15 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
 
 /*
  * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not.
- * If @count is not zero, it is okay to include less @count unmovable pages
  *
  * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that
  * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable
  * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at
  * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact.
  */
-bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
-			 int migratetype, int flags)
+bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
+			 int flags)
 {
-	unsigned long found;
 	unsigned long iter = 0;
 	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
 	const char *reason = "unmovable page";
@@ -8306,13 +8304,11 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
 		goto unmovable;
 	}
 
-	for (found = 0; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
-		unsigned long check = pfn + iter;
-
-		if (!pfn_valid_within(check))
+	for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
+		if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn + iter))
 			continue;
 
-		page = pfn_to_page(check);
+		page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
 
 		if (PageReserved(page))
 			goto unmovable;
@@ -8361,11 +8357,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
 		if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page))
 			continue;
 
-		if (__PageMovable(page))
+		if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page))
 			continue;
 
-		if (!PageLRU(page))
-			found++;
 		/*
 		 * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check
 		 * it.  But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
@@ -8379,8 +8373,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count,
 		 * is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel
 		 * page at boot.
 		 */
-		if (found > count)
-			goto unmovable;
+		goto unmovable;
 	}
 	return false;
 unmovable:
diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index 21af88b718aa..1f8b9dfecbe8 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_
 	 * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself.
 	 * We just check MOVABLE pages.
 	 */
-	if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
+	if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags)) {
 		unsigned long nr_pages;
 		int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
 
-- 
2.21.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-14 13:19 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: remove the memory isolate notifier David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 13:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 19:39   ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-14 19:39     ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-15  3:06   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-15  3:06     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-11-14 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-11-14 13:19   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages() David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 19:40   ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-14 19:40     ` Michal Hocko
2019-11-15 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: remove the memory isolate notifier David Hildenbrand
2019-11-15 13:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-02 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-02 10:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-09 11:15   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-12-09 11:15     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=arunks@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.