[Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)

[Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)

[Ian Jackson]

This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since
obviously the latter use whatever version they are using.

I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent
linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841):
  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911

This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on
4.19; and once recently in 4.14.  Because of the low update rate of
these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have
the logs any more.

I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and
we should update osstest to 4.14.

CC: Roger Pau Monné <royger@FreeBSD.org>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
---
 ap-common | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ap-common b/ap-common
index 6ae7cce6..547b48ed 100644
--- a/ap-common
+++ b/ap-common
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 
 : ${PUSH_TREE_LINUX:=$XENBITS:/home/xen/git/linux-pvops.git}
 : ${BASE_TREE_LINUX:=git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git}
-: ${BASE_TAG_LINUX:=tested/linux-4.14}
+: ${BASE_TAG_LINUX:=tested/linux-4.19}
 : ${BASE_TAG_LINUX_ARM:=tested/linux-arm-xen}
 
 if [ "x${TREE_LINUX}" = x ]; then
-- 
2.11.0


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)

[Roger Pau Monné]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since
> obviously the latter use whatever version they are using.
> 
> I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent
> linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841):
>   test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911
> 
> This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on
> 4.19; and once recently in 4.14.  Because of the low update rate of
> these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have
> the logs any more.
> 
> I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and
> we should update osstest to 4.14.
> 
> CC: Roger Pau Monné <royger@FreeBSD.org>
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>

Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

With this we could start adding pvh dom0 jobs :)

Thanks, Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)

[Wei Liu]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since
> obviously the latter use whatever version they are using.
> 
> I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent
> linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841):
>   test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911
> 
> This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on
> 4.19; and once recently in 4.14.  Because of the low update rate of
> these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have
> the logs any more.
> 
> I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and
> we should update osstest to 4.14.
> 
> CC: Roger Pau Monné <royger@FreeBSD.org>
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>


Acked-by: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>

On a related note, the most recent Linux LTS is 5.4. It would be great
if we start testing it in OSSTest and eventually switch to it.

Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)

[Pasi Kärkkäinen]

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This affects only x86 and only the branches that aren't linux-*, since
> obviously the latter use whatever version they are using.
> 
> I compared the most recent linux-4.19 results with the most recent
> linux-4.14 ones, and there was only one new failure (in 143841):
>   test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs. 143911
> 
> This step has failed twice in the web-visible history of this job on
> 4.19; and once recently in 4.14.  Because of the low update rate of
> these trees nowadays, these tests are a while ago and we don't have
> the logs any more.
> 
> I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and
> we should update osstest to 4.14.
>                             ^^^^

Just a small note: typo? Shouldn't that be 4.19 ?


-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)

[Ian Jackson]

Pasi Kärkkäinen writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST PATCH] Switch to linux-4.19 by default (from 4.14)"):
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:04:33PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I think given that it's already not perfect this is not a blocker and
> > we should update osstest to 4.14.
> >                             ^^^^
> 
> Just a small note: typo? Shouldn't that be 4.19 ?

Yes, well spotted.  The actual code is right, luckily.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel