All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <jgross@suse.com>,
	<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<kamatam@amazon.com>, <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	<konrad.wilk@oracle.co>, <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	<axboe@kernel.dk>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	<len.brown@intel.com>, <pavel@ucw.cz>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<eduval@amazon.com>, <sblbir@amazon.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dwmw@amazon.co.uk>, <anchalag@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 09/11] xen: Clear IRQD_IRQ_STARTED flag during shutdown PIRQs
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 22:57:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200110225718.GA13573@dev-dsk-anchalag-2a-9c2d1d96.us-west-2.amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zhevrupf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 08:13:16PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Anchal,
> 
> Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com> writes:
> >> So either you can handle it purely on the XEN side without touching any
> >> core state or you need to come up with some way of letting the core code
> >> know that it should invoke shutdown instead of disable.
> >> 
> >> Something like the completely untested patch below.
> >
> > Understandable. Really appreciate the patch suggestion below and i will test it
> > for sure and see if things can be fixed properly in irq core if thats the only
> > option. In the meanwhile, I tried to fix it on xen side unless it gives you the 
> > same feeling as above? MSI-x are just fine, just ioapic ones don't get any event
> > channel asssigned hence enable_dynirq does nothing. Those needs to be restarted.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > index 1bb0b522d004..2ed152f35816 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> >     +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > @@ -575,6 +575,11 @@ static void shutdown_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
> >
> > static void enable_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
> > {
> >     +/*ioapic interrupts don't get event channel assigned
> >        + * after being explicitly shutdown during guest
> >        + * hibernation. They need to be restarted*/
> >         +       if(!evtchn_from_irq(data->irq))
> >         +               startup_pirq(data);
> >     enable_dynirq(data);
> >  }
> 
> Interesting patch format :)
Apparently vim and me rushing through the email [did not format the patch]
were the culprit and I only caught it after sending an email
> 
> Doing the shutdown from syscore_ops and the startup conditionally in a
> totaly unrelated function is not really intuitive.
> 
I agree to the point that still the startup is not as synchronous 
to shutdown however, enable_pirq is still invoked during irq_startup
for xen specific code and I was trying to reuse the code path to fix 
within xen. Basically borrowing from what this commit [commit 020db9d3]
changed. Not sure if this could have broken under any other environment
though :(

But anyways I think the patch you suggested is much more clean and 
intuitive.

> So either you do it symmetrically in XEN via syscore_ops callbacks or
> you let the irq core code help you out with the patch I provided
> 
In my understanding, it may not be the right thing as syscore stuff runs
with one cpu online and disabled interrupts. Also I did try it in the past 
and failed horribly unless there is any smarter way of doing it.
It should correctly be done in suspend/resume devices as are other device 
interrupts.

I did test the patch you suggested and it works.
I haven't done large scale testing but it looks like it may just work fine.
I will send out an updated patch for shutdown/startup of pirq after I do some
more testing and will drop patches related to shutdown/startup of pirqs from 
the original series.

Thanks,

Anchal

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.co, eduval@amazon.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	pavel@ucw.cz, hpa@zytor.com, sstabellini@kernel.org,
	kamatam@amazon.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, sblbir@amazon.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	anchalag@amazon.com, bp@alien8.de, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	jgross@suse.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vkuznets@redhat.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH V2 09/11] xen: Clear IRQD_IRQ_STARTED flag during shutdown PIRQs
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 22:57:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200110225718.GA13573@dev-dsk-anchalag-2a-9c2d1d96.us-west-2.amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zhevrupf.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 08:13:16PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Anchal,
> 
> Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com> writes:
> >> So either you can handle it purely on the XEN side without touching any
> >> core state or you need to come up with some way of letting the core code
> >> know that it should invoke shutdown instead of disable.
> >> 
> >> Something like the completely untested patch below.
> >
> > Understandable. Really appreciate the patch suggestion below and i will test it
> > for sure and see if things can be fixed properly in irq core if thats the only
> > option. In the meanwhile, I tried to fix it on xen side unless it gives you the 
> > same feeling as above? MSI-x are just fine, just ioapic ones don't get any event
> > channel asssigned hence enable_dynirq does nothing. Those needs to be restarted.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > index 1bb0b522d004..2ed152f35816 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> >     +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> > @@ -575,6 +575,11 @@ static void shutdown_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
> >
> > static void enable_pirq(struct irq_data *data)
> > {
> >     +/*ioapic interrupts don't get event channel assigned
> >        + * after being explicitly shutdown during guest
> >        + * hibernation. They need to be restarted*/
> >         +       if(!evtchn_from_irq(data->irq))
> >         +               startup_pirq(data);
> >     enable_dynirq(data);
> >  }
> 
> Interesting patch format :)
Apparently vim and me rushing through the email [did not format the patch]
were the culprit and I only caught it after sending an email
> 
> Doing the shutdown from syscore_ops and the startup conditionally in a
> totaly unrelated function is not really intuitive.
> 
I agree to the point that still the startup is not as synchronous 
to shutdown however, enable_pirq is still invoked during irq_startup
for xen specific code and I was trying to reuse the code path to fix 
within xen. Basically borrowing from what this commit [commit 020db9d3]
changed. Not sure if this could have broken under any other environment
though :(

But anyways I think the patch you suggested is much more clean and 
intuitive.

> So either you do it symmetrically in XEN via syscore_ops callbacks or
> you let the irq core code help you out with the patch I provided
> 
In my understanding, it may not be the right thing as syscore stuff runs
with one cpu online and disabled interrupts. Also I did try it in the past 
and failed horribly unless there is any smarter way of doing it.
It should correctly be done in suspend/resume devices as are other device 
interrupts.

I did test the patch you suggested and it works.
I haven't done large scale testing but it looks like it may just work fine.
I will send out an updated patch for shutdown/startup of pirq after I do some
more testing and will drop patches related to shutdown/startup of pirqs from 
the original series.

Thanks,

Anchal

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-10 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-07 23:44 [RFC PATCH V2 09/11] xen: Clear IRQD_IRQ_STARTED flag during shutdown PIRQs Anchal Agarwal
2020-01-07 23:44 ` [Xen-devel] " Anchal Agarwal
2020-01-08 15:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-08 15:23   ` [Xen-devel] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-08 21:24   ` Anchal Agarwal
2020-01-08 21:24     ` [Xen-devel] " Anchal Agarwal
2020-01-09 12:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-09 12:07       ` [Xen-devel] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-09 23:40       ` Anchal Agarwal
2020-01-09 23:40         ` [Xen-devel] " Anchal Agarwal
2020-01-10 19:13         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 19:13           ` [Xen-devel] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 22:57           ` Anchal Agarwal [this message]
2020-01-10 22:57             ` Anchal Agarwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200110225718.GA13573@dev-dsk-anchalag-2a-9c2d1d96.us-west-2.amazon.com \
    --to=anchalag@amazon.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=eduval@amazon.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kamatam@amazon.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.co \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sblbir@amazon.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.