All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:05:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200613170554.GA14787@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <edbf4ead-6f2d-e548-ee40-517b3ee6ba07@linuxfoundation.org>

Hi Shuah,

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:08:36AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 6/12/20 3:07 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:28:09AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 12:03 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >>> People that know the sub-systems well might not
> >>> have time to document and more importantly keeping the documents
> >>> updated.
> >>
> >> So you somehow expect people that do _not_ know the
> >> sub-system well to produce good and useful documentation?
> > 
> > Writing documentation is a way to learn.
> 
> +1
> 
> I find it useful and I also use it as learning tool. When I attempt
> document or explain a concept or an area, I get a deeper understanding
> of that area.

I only partly agree with that. I started the DRM documentation effort
because I had to write a driver, and there was no documentation. Writing
doc was indeed a way to learn, but it's a really high barrier to entry,
more difficult than "just" writing a new driver. You need a very high
level of motivation to do so, I don't think it's a suitable for someone
who has little technical knowledge of the Linux kernel for instance. It
also requires lots of time.

> > Besides, to produce good and usefull documentation it is not necessary
> > to have very deep understanding of all the small details. The writer
> > must capture the large picture and be able to explain it.
> 
> +1.
> 
> I would counter the argument that new developers can't document an area,
> they can and the document can be reviewed by experts.
> 
> A fresh set of eyes bring a new perspective and could help improve the
> code, just like the benefits of having others test your code.

A fresh set of eyes can point to inconsistencies in the code while
writing documentation, but I don't share the view that we can consider
documentation writing as a good learning curve task in general, it
really requires lots of time and a strong incentive in addition to
documentation writing itself.

> I have had some level of success adding documentation tasks in the
> mentoring program. It does require experts spending time reviewing to
> make sure it is correct.

Are those proposed, ongoing or completed tasks ? If some are completed,
could you share information about what has been produced ?

> One thing we could do is creating a list documentation todo and review
> which is part of our development workflow anyway.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
Ksummit-discuss mailing list
Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-13 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-09 20:53 [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Documentation Jonathan Corbet
2020-06-10  8:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-06-11  8:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-11 14:48 ` Linus Walleij
2020-06-11 18:03   ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-11 18:28     ` Joe Perches
2020-06-11 19:44       ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-12  8:18         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-06-12  9:19           ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-12 10:58             ` Mark Brown
2020-06-12 15:48           ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-12  9:07       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-12 16:08         ` Shuah Khan
2020-06-13 16:42           ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-13 16:51             ` Joe Perches
2020-06-13 17:04               ` Julia Lawall
2020-06-14 13:23               ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-14 14:13                 ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-15  9:46               ` Jani Nikula
2020-06-18  9:04               ` Mike Rapoport
2020-06-18 14:40                 ` Joe Perches
     [not found]                   ` <20200709122118.0ffaea91@coco.lan>
2020-07-09 11:42                     ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 12:11                       ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-09 16:59                         ` Joe Perches
2020-07-09 17:29                           ` Mike Rapoport
2020-07-09 17:57                             ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]                               ` <104986.1594328429@turing-police>
2020-07-10  0:03                                 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-13 17:05           ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-06-18  9:08 ` Mike Rapoport
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-12 14:54 Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-12 18:22 ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-12 19:12   ` Martin K. Petersen
2019-06-12 19:43     ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-13 14:25   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-14 21:40     ` Shuah Khan
2019-06-15  0:05       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-17 10:12         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-17 17:21           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-12 20:33 ` Kate Stewart
2019-06-13 14:17   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-13 14:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-13 18:48   ` Greg KH
2019-06-13 19:01     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2019-06-20 18:36 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-20 19:28   ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-07-22 14:52 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200613170554.GA14787@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.