From: Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com> To: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>, bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 10/14 v3] PCI: Check return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:20:22 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200710212026.27136-11-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200710212026.27136-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com> On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter, val to 0. However, with Patch 14/14, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x). This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_word is checked to confirm success. Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_word() to ensure success. Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com> Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com> --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 2f66988cea25..3c87a8a1d4b5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1121,10 +1121,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_add_new_bus); static void pci_enable_crs(struct pci_dev *pdev) { u16 root_cap = 0; + int ret; /* Enable CRS Software Visibility if supported */ - pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_RTCAP, &root_cap); - if (root_cap & PCI_EXP_RTCAP_CRSVIS) + ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_RTCAP, &root_cap); + if (!ret && (root_cap & PCI_EXP_RTCAP_CRSVIS)) pcie_capability_set_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_RTCTL, PCI_EXP_RTCTL_CRSSVE); } @@ -1519,9 +1520,10 @@ void set_pcie_port_type(struct pci_dev *pdev) void set_pcie_hotplug_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev) { u32 reg32; + int ret; - pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, ®32); - if (reg32 & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC) + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, ®32); + if (!ret && (reg32 & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC)) pdev->is_hotplug_bridge = 1; } @@ -2057,10 +2059,11 @@ int pci_configure_extended_tags(struct pci_dev *dev, void *ign) bool pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev) { u16 v; + int ret; - pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &v); + ret = pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &v); - return !!(v & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN); + return (!ret && !!(v & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled); @@ -2096,16 +2099,17 @@ static void pci_configure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev) struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus); struct pci_dev *bridge; u32 cap, ctl; + int ret; if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) return; - pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); - if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_LTR)) + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); + if (ret || !(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_LTR)) return; - pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl); - if (ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN) { + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl); + if (!ret && (ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) { if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) { dev->ltr_path = 1; return; @@ -2142,12 +2146,13 @@ static void pci_configure_eetlp_prefix(struct pci_dev *dev) struct pci_dev *bridge; int pcie_type; u32 cap; + int ret; if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) return; - pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); - if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_EE_PREFIX)) + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); + if (ret || !(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_EE_PREFIX)) return; pcie_type = pci_pcie_type(dev); -- 2.18.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com> To: helgaas@kernel.org Cc: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 10/14 v3] PCI: Check return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 23:20:22 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20200710212026.27136-11-refactormyself@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200710212026.27136-1-refactormyself@gmail.com> From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com> On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter, val to 0. However, with Patch 14/14, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x). This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_word is checked to confirm success. Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_word() to ensure success. Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn@helgaas.com> Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <refactormyself@gmail.com> --- drivers/pci/probe.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index 2f66988cea25..3c87a8a1d4b5 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1121,10 +1121,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_add_new_bus); static void pci_enable_crs(struct pci_dev *pdev) { u16 root_cap = 0; + int ret; /* Enable CRS Software Visibility if supported */ - pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_RTCAP, &root_cap); - if (root_cap & PCI_EXP_RTCAP_CRSVIS) + ret = pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_RTCAP, &root_cap); + if (!ret && (root_cap & PCI_EXP_RTCAP_CRSVIS)) pcie_capability_set_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_RTCTL, PCI_EXP_RTCTL_CRSSVE); } @@ -1519,9 +1520,10 @@ void set_pcie_port_type(struct pci_dev *pdev) void set_pcie_hotplug_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev) { u32 reg32; + int ret; - pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, ®32); - if (reg32 & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC) + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP, ®32); + if (!ret && (reg32 & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC)) pdev->is_hotplug_bridge = 1; } @@ -2057,10 +2059,11 @@ int pci_configure_extended_tags(struct pci_dev *dev, void *ign) bool pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(struct pci_dev *dev) { u16 v; + int ret; - pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &v); + ret = pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, &v); - return !!(v & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN); + return (!ret && !!(v & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled); @@ -2096,16 +2099,17 @@ static void pci_configure_ltr(struct pci_dev *dev) struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus); struct pci_dev *bridge; u32 cap, ctl; + int ret; if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) return; - pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); - if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_LTR)) + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); + if (ret || !(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_LTR)) return; - pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl); - if (ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN) { + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2, &ctl); + if (!ret && (ctl & PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_LTR_EN)) { if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) { dev->ltr_path = 1; return; @@ -2142,12 +2146,13 @@ static void pci_configure_eetlp_prefix(struct pci_dev *dev) struct pci_dev *bridge; int pcie_type; u32 cap; + int ret; if (!pci_is_pcie(dev)) return; - pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); - if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_EE_PREFIX)) + ret = pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap); + if (ret || !(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_EE_PREFIX)) return; pcie_type = pci_pcie_type(dev); -- 2.18.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-10 22:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-07-10 21:20 [PATCH 0/14 v3] PCI: Remove '*val = 0' from pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/14 v3] misc: rtsx: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 5/14 v3] PCI: pciehp: " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 6/14 v3] PCI: pciehp: Make "Power On" the default Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 7/14 v3] PCI: pciehp: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 9/14 v3] PCI: pciehp: Check " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa [this message] 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 10/14 v3] PCI: " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 11/14 v3] PCI/PM: " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-14 8:10 ` David Laight 2020-07-14 8:10 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " David Laight 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 13/14] PCI/ASPM: Check the " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [PATCH 14/14 v3] PCI: Remove '*val = 0' from pcie_capability_read_*() Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa 2020-07-10 21:20 ` Saheed Olayemi Bolarinwa [not found] ` <20200710212026.27136-5-refactormyself@gmail.com> 2020-07-13 13:44 ` [PATCH 4/14 v3] iwlegacy: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*() Kalle Valo 2020-07-13 18:02 ` Saheed Bolarinwa
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20200710212026.27136-11-refactormyself@gmail.com \ --to=refactormyself@gmail.com \ --cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \ --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.