All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: trix@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	bjorn@helgaas.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b720aa44-895a-203b-e220-ecdb3acd9278@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:28:00PM +0200, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
> Because the value ~0 has a meaning to some drivers and only

No, ~0 means that the PCI read failed. For *every* PCI device I know.

Here's me reading from 0xf0 offset of my hostbridge:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0xf0.l
01000000

That device doesn't have extended config space, so the last valid byte
is 0xff. Let's read beyond that:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0x100.l
ffffffff

> Again, only the drivers can determine if ~0 is a valid value. This
> information is not available inside pci_config_read*().

Of course it is.

*every* change you've done in 6/17 - this is the only patch I have
received - checks for == ~0. So that check can just as well be moved
inside pci_config_read_*().

Here's how one could do it:

#define PCI_OP_READ(size, type, len) \
int noinline pci_bus_read_config_##size \
	(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int pos, type *value)	\
{									\
	int res;							\
	unsigned long flags;						\
	u32 data = 0;							\
	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
	pci_lock_config(flags);						\
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);		\

	/* Check we actually read something which is not all 1s.*/
	if (data == ~0)
		return PCIBIOS_READ_FAILED;

	*value = (type)data;						\
	pci_unlock_config(flags);					\
	return res;							\
}

Also, I'd prefer a function to *not* return void but return either
an error or success. In the success case, the @value argument can be
consumed by the caller and otherwise not.

In any case, that change is a step in the wrong direction and I don't
like it, sorry.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	trix@redhat.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, helgaas@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, bjorn@helgaas.com,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b720aa44-895a-203b-e220-ecdb3acd9278@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:28:00PM +0200, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
> Because the value ~0 has a meaning to some drivers and only

No, ~0 means that the PCI read failed. For *every* PCI device I know.

Here's me reading from 0xf0 offset of my hostbridge:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0xf0.l
01000000

That device doesn't have extended config space, so the last valid byte
is 0xff. Let's read beyond that:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0x100.l
ffffffff

> Again, only the drivers can determine if ~0 is a valid value. This
> information is not available inside pci_config_read*().

Of course it is.

*every* change you've done in 6/17 - this is the only patch I have
received - checks for == ~0. So that check can just as well be moved
inside pci_config_read_*().

Here's how one could do it:

#define PCI_OP_READ(size, type, len) \
int noinline pci_bus_read_config_##size \
	(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int pos, type *value)	\
{									\
	int res;							\
	unsigned long flags;						\
	u32 data = 0;							\
	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
	pci_lock_config(flags);						\
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);		\

	/* Check we actually read something which is not all 1s.*/
	if (data == ~0)
		return PCIBIOS_READ_FAILED;

	*value = (type)data;						\
	pci_unlock_config(flags);					\
	return res;							\
}

Also, I'd prefer a function to *not* return void but return either
an error or success. In the success case, the @value argument can be
consumed by the caller and otherwise not.

In any case, that change is a step in the wrong direction and I don't
like it, sorry.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	trix@redhat.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, helgaas@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, bjorn@helgaas.com,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b720aa44-895a-203b-e220-ecdb3acd9278@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:28:00PM +0200, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
> Because the value ~0 has a meaning to some drivers and only

No, ~0 means that the PCI read failed. For *every* PCI device I know.

Here's me reading from 0xf0 offset of my hostbridge:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0xf0.l
01000000

That device doesn't have extended config space, so the last valid byte
is 0xff. Let's read beyond that:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0x100.l
ffffffff

> Again, only the drivers can determine if ~0 is a valid value. This
> information is not available inside pci_config_read*().

Of course it is.

*every* change you've done in 6/17 - this is the only patch I have
received - checks for == ~0. So that check can just as well be moved
inside pci_config_read_*().

Here's how one could do it:

#define PCI_OP_READ(size, type, len) \
int noinline pci_bus_read_config_##size \
	(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int pos, type *value)	\
{									\
	int res;							\
	unsigned long flags;						\
	u32 data = 0;							\
	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
	pci_lock_config(flags);						\
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);		\

	/* Check we actually read something which is not all 1s.*/
	if (data == ~0)
		return PCIBIOS_READ_FAILED;

	*value = (type)data;						\
	pci_unlock_config(flags);					\
	return res;							\
}

Also, I'd prefer a function to *not* return void but return either
an error or success. In the success case, the @value argument can be
consumed by the caller and otherwise not.

In any case, that change is a step in the wrong direction and I don't
like it, sorry.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	trix@redhat.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, helgaas@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b720aa44-895a-203b-e220-ecdb3acd9278@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:28:00PM +0200, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
> Because the value ~0 has a meaning to some drivers and only

No, ~0 means that the PCI read failed. For *every* PCI device I know.

Here's me reading from 0xf0 offset of my hostbridge:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0xf0.l
01000000

That device doesn't have extended config space, so the last valid byte
is 0xff. Let's read beyond that:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0x100.l
ffffffff

> Again, only the drivers can determine if ~0 is a valid value. This
> information is not available inside pci_config_read*().

Of course it is.

*every* change you've done in 6/17 - this is the only patch I have
received - checks for == ~0. So that check can just as well be moved
inside pci_config_read_*().

Here's how one could do it:

#define PCI_OP_READ(size, type, len) \
int noinline pci_bus_read_config_##size \
	(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int pos, type *value)	\
{									\
	int res;							\
	unsigned long flags;						\
	u32 data = 0;							\
	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
	pci_lock_config(flags);						\
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);		\

	/* Check we actually read something which is not all 1s.*/
	if (data == ~0)
		return PCIBIOS_READ_FAILED;

	*value = (type)data;						\
	pci_unlock_config(flags);					\
	return res;							\
}

Also, I'd prefer a function to *not* return void but return either
an error or success. In the success case, the @value argument can be
consumed by the caller and otherwise not.

In any case, that change is a step in the wrong direction and I don't
like it, sorry.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	trix@redhat.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, helgaas@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, bjorn@helgaas.com,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b720aa44-895a-203b-e220-ecdb3acd9278@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:28:00PM +0200, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
> Because the value ~0 has a meaning to some drivers and only

No, ~0 means that the PCI read failed. For *every* PCI device I know.

Here's me reading from 0xf0 offset of my hostbridge:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0xf0.l
01000000

That device doesn't have extended config space, so the last valid byte
is 0xff. Let's read beyond that:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0x100.l
ffffffff

> Again, only the drivers can determine if ~0 is a valid value. This
> information is not available inside pci_config_read*().

Of course it is.

*every* change you've done in 6/17 - this is the only patch I have
received - checks for == ~0. So that check can just as well be moved
inside pci_config_read_*().

Here's how one could do it:

#define PCI_OP_READ(size, type, len) \
int noinline pci_bus_read_config_##size \
	(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int pos, type *value)	\
{									\
	int res;							\
	unsigned long flags;						\
	u32 data = 0;							\
	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
	pci_lock_config(flags);						\
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);		\

	/* Check we actually read something which is not all 1s.*/
	if (data == ~0)
		return PCIBIOS_READ_FAILED;

	*value = (type)data;						\
	pci_unlock_config(flags);					\
	return res;							\
}

Also, I'd prefer a function to *not* return void but return either
an error or success. In the success case, the @value argument can be
consumed by the caller and otherwise not.

In any case, that change is a step in the wrong direction and I don't
like it, sorry.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Saheed Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	trix@redhat.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, helgaas@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, bjorn@helgaas.com,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:46:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b720aa44-895a-203b-e220-ecdb3acd9278@gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 07:28:00PM +0200, Saheed Bolarinwa wrote:
> Because the value ~0 has a meaning to some drivers and only

No, ~0 means that the PCI read failed. For *every* PCI device I know.

Here's me reading from 0xf0 offset of my hostbridge:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0xf0.l
01000000

That device doesn't have extended config space, so the last valid byte
is 0xff. Let's read beyond that:

# setpci -s 00:00.0 0x100.l
ffffffff

> Again, only the drivers can determine if ~0 is a valid value. This
> information is not available inside pci_config_read*().

Of course it is.

*every* change you've done in 6/17 - this is the only patch I have
received - checks for == ~0. So that check can just as well be moved
inside pci_config_read_*().

Here's how one could do it:

#define PCI_OP_READ(size, type, len) \
int noinline pci_bus_read_config_##size \
	(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int pos, type *value)	\
{									\
	int res;							\
	unsigned long flags;						\
	u32 data = 0;							\
	if (PCI_##size##_BAD) return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;	\
	pci_lock_config(flags);						\
	res = bus->ops->read(bus, devfn, pos, len, &data);		\

	/* Check we actually read something which is not all 1s.*/
	if (data == ~0)
		return PCIBIOS_READ_FAILED;

	*value = (type)data;						\
	pci_unlock_config(flags);					\
	return res;							\
}

Also, I'd prefer a function to *not* return void but return either
an error or success. In the success case, the @value argument can be
consumed by the caller and otherwise not.

In any case, that change is a step in the wrong direction and I don't
like it, sorry.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-02 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-01 11:24 [RFC PATCH 00/17] Drop uses of pci_read_config_*() return value Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 01/17] ata: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 02/17] atm: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-05 10:51   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 03/17] bcma: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 04/17] hwrng: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 05/17] dmaengine: ioat: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 06/17] edac: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 21:38   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 07/17] fpga: altera-cvp: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 22:32   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-05 12:31   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 08/17] gpio: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-18 19:59   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-08-18 19:59     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-08-19  2:21     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-19  2:21       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 09/17] drm/i915/vga: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Intel-gfx] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 10/17] hwmon: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-04 21:26   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-08-04 21:26     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Guenter Roeck
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 11/17] intel_th: pci: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 12/17] i2c: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 13/17] ide: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 14/17] IB: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 14:18   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 15/17] iommu/vt-d: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 16/17] mtd: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24 ` [RFC PATCH 17/17] net: " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 11:24   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed O. Bolarinwa
2020-08-01 14:58   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-01 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH 00/17] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-01 12:56   ` [Intel-gfx] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-01 12:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-01 12:56   ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-01 12:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-01 12:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 14:53   ` Tom Rix
2020-08-02 14:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Rix
2020-08-02 14:53     ` Tom Rix
2020-08-02 14:53     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Tom Rix
2020-08-02 14:53     ` Tom Rix
2020-08-02 14:53     ` Tom Rix
2020-08-02 17:28   ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-08-02 17:28     ` [Intel-gfx] " Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-08-02 17:28     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-08-02 17:28     ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-08-02 17:28     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-08-02 17:28     ` Saheed Bolarinwa
2020-08-02 18:46     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-08-02 18:46       ` [Intel-gfx] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 18:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 18:46       ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 18:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 18:46       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 19:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-02 19:14         ` [Intel-gfx] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-02 19:14         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-02 19:14         ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-02 19:14         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-02 19:14         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-08-02 20:18         ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 20:18           ` [Intel-gfx] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 20:18           ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 20:18           ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 20:18           ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-02 20:18           ` Borislav Petkov
2020-08-03  6:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-03  6:56           ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-03  6:56           ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-03  6:56           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-03  6:56           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200802184648.GA23190@nazgul.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bjorn@helgaas.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=refactormyself@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.