From: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: pkshih@realtek.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, yashsri421@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH 2/5] rtlwifi: rtl8192c-common: fix bool comparison in expressions Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:45:22 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210110121525.2407-3-yashsri421@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210110121525.2407-1-yashsri421@gmail.com> There are certain conditional expressions in rtl8192c-common, where a boolean variable is compared with true/false, in forms such as (foo == true) or (false != bar), which does not comply with checkpatch.pl (CHECK: BOOL_COMPARISON), according to which boolean variables should be themselves used in the condition, rather than comparing with true/false E.g., in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c, "else if (initialized == false) {" can be replaced with "else if (!initialized) {" Replace all such expressions with the bool variables appropriately Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c index 265a1a336304..0b6a15c2e5cc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void rtl92c_dm_initial_gain_multi_sta(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) initialized = false; dm_digtable->dig_ext_port_stage = DIG_EXT_PORT_STAGE_MAX; return; - } else if (initialized == false) { + } else if (!initialized) { initialized = true; dm_digtable->dig_ext_port_stage = DIG_EXT_PORT_STAGE_0; dm_digtable->cur_igvalue = 0x20; @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static void rtl92c_dm_dig(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) { struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); - if (rtlpriv->dm.dm_initialgain_enable == false) + if (!rtlpriv->dm.dm_initialgain_enable) return; if (!(rtlpriv->dm.dm_flag & DYNAMIC_FUNC_DIG)) return; -- 2.17.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: pkshih@realtek.com, yashsri421@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, kvalo@codeaurora.org Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 2/5] rtlwifi: rtl8192c-common: fix bool comparison in expressions Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:45:22 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210110121525.2407-3-yashsri421@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210110121525.2407-1-yashsri421@gmail.com> There are certain conditional expressions in rtl8192c-common, where a boolean variable is compared with true/false, in forms such as (foo == true) or (false != bar), which does not comply with checkpatch.pl (CHECK: BOOL_COMPARISON), according to which boolean variables should be themselves used in the condition, rather than comparing with true/false E.g., in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c, "else if (initialized == false) {" can be replaced with "else if (!initialized) {" Replace all such expressions with the bool variables appropriately Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c index 265a1a336304..0b6a15c2e5cc 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192c/dm_common.c @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void rtl92c_dm_initial_gain_multi_sta(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) initialized = false; dm_digtable->dig_ext_port_stage = DIG_EXT_PORT_STAGE_MAX; return; - } else if (initialized == false) { + } else if (!initialized) { initialized = true; dm_digtable->dig_ext_port_stage = DIG_EXT_PORT_STAGE_0; dm_digtable->cur_igvalue = 0x20; @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static void rtl92c_dm_dig(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) { struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw); - if (rtlpriv->dm.dm_initialgain_enable == false) + if (!rtlpriv->dm.dm_initialgain_enable) return; if (!(rtlpriv->dm.dm_flag & DYNAMIC_FUNC_DIG)) return; -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-10 12:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-08 15:32 [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: rtlwifi: fix bool comparison in expressions Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-08 15:32 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-08 19:41 ` Larry Finger 2021-01-08 19:41 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Larry Finger 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] rtlwifi: rtl_pci: " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-25 14:22 ` Kalle Valo 2021-01-25 14:22 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Kalle Valo 2021-01-10 12:15 ` Aditya Srivastava [this message] 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 2/5] rtlwifi: rtl8192c-common: " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/5] rtlwifi: rtl8188ee: " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 4/5] rtlwifi: rtl8192se: " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] rtlwifi: rtl8821ae: " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-10 12:15 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya Srivastava 2021-01-13 17:11 ` [PATCH] drivers: net: wireless: rtlwifi: " Aditya 2021-01-13 17:11 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Aditya
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210110121525.2407-3-yashsri421@gmail.com \ --to=yashsri421@gmail.com \ --cc=davem@davemloft.net \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pkshih@realtek.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.