From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, kuba@kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, po.liu@nxp.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, mkubecek@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 6/8] igc: Add support for tuning frame preemption via ethtool Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:07:26 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210303010726.7rt6j53zg5xwwtex@skbuf> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210122224453.4161729-7-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:44:51PM -0800, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h > index 0e78abfd99ee..c2155d109bd6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h > @@ -410,10 +410,14 @@ > /* Transmit Scheduling */ > #define IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN 0x00000001 > #define IGC_TQAVCTRL_ENHANCED_QAV 0x00000008 > +#define IGC_TQAVCTRL_PREEMPT_ENA 0x00000002 > +#define IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_MASK 0x0000C000 > +#define IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_SHIFT 14 > @@ -83,13 +89,22 @@ static int igc_tsn_enable_offload(struct igc_adapter *adapter) > wr32(IGC_DTXMXPKTSZ, IGC_DTXMXPKTSZ_TSN); > wr32(IGC_TXPBS, IGC_TXPBSIZE_TSN); > > - tqavctrl = rd32(IGC_TQAVCTRL); > rxpbs = rd32(IGC_RXPBS) & ~IGC_RXPBSIZE_SIZE_MASK; > rxpbs |= IGC_RXPBSIZE_TSN; > > wr32(IGC_RXPBS, rxpbs); > > + tqavctrl = rd32(IGC_TQAVCTRL) & > + ~(IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_MASK | IGC_TQAVCTRL_PREEMPT_ENA); > tqavctrl |= IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN | IGC_TQAVCTRL_ENHANCED_QAV; > + > + if (adapter->frame_preemption_active) > + tqavctrl |= IGC_TQAVCTRL_PREEMPT_ENA; Question: when adapter->frame_preemption_active is false, does the port have the pMAC enabled, and can it receive preemptable frames? Maybe we should be very explicit that the ethtool frame preemption only configures the egress side, and that a driver capable of FP should always turn on the pMAC on RX. Are you aware of any performance downsides? > + > + frag_size_mult = ethtool_frag_size_to_mult(adapter->add_frag_size); > + > + tqavctrl |= frag_size_mult << IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_SHIFT; > + > wr32(IGC_TQAVCTRL, tqavctrl); > > wr32(IGC_QBVCYCLET_S, cycle);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 6/8] igc: Add support for tuning frame preemption via ethtool Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:07:26 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210303010726.7rt6j53zg5xwwtex@skbuf> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210122224453.4161729-7-vinicius.gomes@intel.com> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 02:44:51PM -0800, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h > index 0e78abfd99ee..c2155d109bd6 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_defines.h > @@ -410,10 +410,14 @@ > /* Transmit Scheduling */ > #define IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN 0x00000001 > #define IGC_TQAVCTRL_ENHANCED_QAV 0x00000008 > +#define IGC_TQAVCTRL_PREEMPT_ENA 0x00000002 > +#define IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_MASK 0x0000C000 > +#define IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_SHIFT 14 > @@ -83,13 +89,22 @@ static int igc_tsn_enable_offload(struct igc_adapter *adapter) > wr32(IGC_DTXMXPKTSZ, IGC_DTXMXPKTSZ_TSN); > wr32(IGC_TXPBS, IGC_TXPBSIZE_TSN); > > - tqavctrl = rd32(IGC_TQAVCTRL); > rxpbs = rd32(IGC_RXPBS) & ~IGC_RXPBSIZE_SIZE_MASK; > rxpbs |= IGC_RXPBSIZE_TSN; > > wr32(IGC_RXPBS, rxpbs); > > + tqavctrl = rd32(IGC_TQAVCTRL) & > + ~(IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_MASK | IGC_TQAVCTRL_PREEMPT_ENA); > tqavctrl |= IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN | IGC_TQAVCTRL_ENHANCED_QAV; > + > + if (adapter->frame_preemption_active) > + tqavctrl |= IGC_TQAVCTRL_PREEMPT_ENA; Question: when adapter->frame_preemption_active is false, does the port have the pMAC enabled, and can it receive preemptable frames? Maybe we should be very explicit that the ethtool frame preemption only configures the egress side, and that a driver capable of FP should always turn on the pMAC on RX. Are you aware of any performance downsides? > + > + frag_size_mult = ethtool_frag_size_to_mult(adapter->add_frag_size); > + > + tqavctrl |= frag_size_mult << IGC_TQAVCTRL_MIN_FRAG_SHIFT; > + > wr32(IGC_TQAVCTRL, tqavctrl); > > wr32(IGC_QBVCYCLET_S, cycle);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 4:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-01-22 22:44 [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/8] ethtool: Add support for configuring " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-03-02 14:23 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-03-02 14:23 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-03-03 0:40 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-03-03 0:40 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-03-03 0:51 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-03-03 0:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-03-05 22:38 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-03-05 22:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/8] taprio: Add support for frame preemption offload Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-26 0:09 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-26 0:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-29 21:13 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 21:13 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 21:57 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-01-29 21:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski 2021-01-29 23:12 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 23:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-30 0:27 ` Jakub Kicinski 2021-01-30 0:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski 2021-01-29 23:20 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-29 23:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-29 23:42 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 23:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-30 0:25 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-30 0:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] igc: Set the RX packet buffer size for TSN mode Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/8] igc: Only dump registers if configured to dump HW information Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/8] igc: Avoid TX Hangs because long cycles Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-26 0:02 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-26 0:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-27 9:03 ` Kurt Kanzenbach 2021-01-27 9:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kurt Kanzenbach 2021-01-29 21:01 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 21:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/8] igc: Add support for tuning frame preemption via ethtool Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-26 0:32 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-26 0:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-29 21:27 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 21:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 23:16 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-29 23:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-03-03 1:07 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message] 2021-03-03 1:07 ` Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/8] igc: Add support for Frame Preemption offload Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/8] igc: Separate TSN configurations that can be updated Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-22 22:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-29 23:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-29 23:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vladimir Oltean 2021-01-30 0:11 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes 2021-01-30 0:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210303010726.7rt6j53zg5xwwtex@skbuf \ --to=olteanv@gmail.com \ --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \ --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \ --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \ --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \ --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \ --cc=kuba@kernel.org \ --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=po.liu@nxp.com \ --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \ --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \ --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.