All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() and phys_mem_set_alloc()
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:22:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210310172208.02f8b988.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303130916.22553-1-david@redhat.com>

On Wed,  3 Mar 2021 14:09:14 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Let's finally get rid of the alternative allocation function. Outcome of
> a discussion in:
>     https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210303123517.04729c1e.cohuck@redhat.com
> 
> David Hildenbrand (2):
>   s390x/kvm: Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc()
>   exec: Get rid of phys_mem_set_alloc()
> 
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  4 ----
>  softmmu/physmem.c    | 36 +++---------------------------------
>  target/s390x/kvm.c   | 43 +++++--------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, applied.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() and phys_mem_set_alloc()
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:22:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210310172208.02f8b988.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303130916.22553-1-david@redhat.com>

On Wed,  3 Mar 2021 14:09:14 +0100
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> Let's finally get rid of the alternative allocation function. Outcome of
> a discussion in:
>     https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210303123517.04729c1e.cohuck@redhat.com
> 
> David Hildenbrand (2):
>   s390x/kvm: Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc()
>   exec: Get rid of phys_mem_set_alloc()
> 
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h |  4 ----
>  softmmu/physmem.c    | 36 +++---------------------------------
>  target/s390x/kvm.c   | 43 +++++--------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks, applied.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03 13:09 [PATCH v1 0/2] Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() and phys_mem_set_alloc() David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 13:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] s390x/kvm: Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 13:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 13:31   ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-03 13:31     ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-03 14:07   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-03 14:07     ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-03 16:13   ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-03 16:13     ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] exec: Get rid of phys_mem_set_alloc() David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 13:09   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 14:38   ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-03 14:38     ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-03 16:18   ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-03 16:18     ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-04 13:44 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() and phys_mem_set_alloc() Cornelia Huck
2021-03-04 13:44   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-10 16:22 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-03-10 16:22   ` Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210310172208.02f8b988.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.