All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: High kmalloc-32 slab cache consumption with 10k containers
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:22:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202104051607.NjVgYndS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9569 bytes --]

Hi Bharata,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.12-rc6 next-20210401]
[cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bharata-B-Rao/High-kmalloc-32-slab-cache-consumption-with-10k-containers/20210405-135124
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 5e46d1b78a03d52306f21f77a4e4a144b6d31486
config: s390-randconfig-r032-20210405 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 2760a808b9916a2839513b7fd7314a464f52481e)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b7ba3522029771bd74c8b6324de9ce20b5a06593
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Bharata-B-Rao/High-kmalloc-32-slab-cache-consumption-with-10k-containers/20210405-135124
        git checkout b7ba3522029771bd74c8b6324de9ce20b5a06593
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:36:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:49: error: no member named 'memcg_lrus' in 'struct list_lru_node'
                           memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                                                  ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:562:31: note: expanded from macro 'rcu_dereference_protected'
           __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
                                        ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:383:12: note: expanded from macro '__rcu_dereference_protected'
           ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
                     ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:49: error: no member named 'memcg_lrus' in 'struct list_lru_node'
                           memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                                                  ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:562:31: note: expanded from macro 'rcu_dereference_protected'
           __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
                                        ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:383:35: note: expanded from macro '__rcu_dereference_protected'
           ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
                                            ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:15: error: assigning to 'struct list_lru_memcg *' from incompatible type 'void'
                           memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   12 warnings and 3 errors generated.


vim +138 mm/list_lru.c

   120	
   121	bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
   122	{
   123		int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
   124		struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
   125		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
   126		struct list_lru_one *l;
   127		struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus;
   128	
   129		spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
   130		if (list_empty(item)) {
   131			l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item, &memcg);
   132			if (!l) {
   133				l = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_lru_one), GFP_ATOMIC);
   134				if (!l)
   135					goto out;
   136	
   137				init_one_lru(l);
 > 138				memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
   139				memcg_lrus->lru[memcg_cache_id(memcg)] = l;
   140			}
   141			list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
   142			/* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
   143			if (!l->nr_items++)
   144				memcg_set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid,
   145						       lru_shrinker_id(lru));
   146			nlru->nr_items++;
   147			spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
   148			return true;
   149		}
   150	out:
   151		spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
   152		return false;
   153	}
   154	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
   155	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 23956 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: High kmalloc-32 slab cache consumption with 10k containers
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 16:22:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202104051607.NjVgYndS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9738 bytes --]

Hi Bharata,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.12-rc6 next-20210401]
[cannot apply to hnaz-linux-mm/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Bharata-B-Rao/High-kmalloc-32-slab-cache-consumption-with-10k-containers/20210405-135124
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 5e46d1b78a03d52306f21f77a4e4a144b6d31486
config: s390-randconfig-r032-20210405 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 2760a808b9916a2839513b7fd7314a464f52481e)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b7ba3522029771bd74c8b6324de9ce20b5a06593
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Bharata-B-Rao/High-kmalloc-32-slab-cache-consumption-with-10k-containers/20210405-135124
        git checkout b7ba3522029771bd74c8b6324de9ce20b5a06593
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:36:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from mm/list_lru.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22:
   In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23:
   In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:26:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:49: error: no member named 'memcg_lrus' in 'struct list_lru_node'
                           memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                                                  ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:562:31: note: expanded from macro 'rcu_dereference_protected'
           __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
                                        ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:383:12: note: expanded from macro '__rcu_dereference_protected'
           ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
                     ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:49: error: no member named 'memcg_lrus' in 'struct list_lru_node'
                           memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                                                  ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:562:31: note: expanded from macro 'rcu_dereference_protected'
           __rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
                                        ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:383:35: note: expanded from macro '__rcu_dereference_protected'
           ((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
                                            ^
>> mm/list_lru.c:138:15: error: assigning to 'struct list_lru_memcg *' from incompatible type 'void'
                           memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
                                      ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   12 warnings and 3 errors generated.


vim +138 mm/list_lru.c

   120	
   121	bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
   122	{
   123		int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
   124		struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
   125		struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
   126		struct list_lru_one *l;
   127		struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus;
   128	
   129		spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
   130		if (list_empty(item)) {
   131			l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item, &memcg);
   132			if (!l) {
   133				l = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_lru_one), GFP_ATOMIC);
   134				if (!l)
   135					goto out;
   136	
   137				init_one_lru(l);
 > 138				memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true);
   139				memcg_lrus->lru[memcg_cache_id(memcg)] = l;
   140			}
   141			list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
   142			/* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
   143			if (!l->nr_items++)
   144				memcg_set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid,
   145						       lru_shrinker_id(lru));
   146			nlru->nr_items++;
   147			spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
   148			return true;
   149		}
   150	out:
   151		spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
   152		return false;
   153	}
   154	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add);
   155	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 23956 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-05  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-05  5:48 High kmalloc-32 slab cache consumption with 10k containers Bharata B Rao
2021-04-05  8:22 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-04-05  8:22   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-05 18:08 ` Yang Shi
2021-04-05 18:08   ` Yang Shi
2021-04-05 18:38   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-04-06 10:13     ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-06 10:05   ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-07  1:39     ` Yang Shi
2021-04-07  1:39       ` Yang Shi
2021-04-06 22:28 ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-07  5:05   ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-07 10:07     ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-04-07 11:47       ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-07 12:49         ` Kirill Tkhai
2021-04-07 13:57   ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-15  5:23   ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-15  6:54     ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15  7:21       ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-16  4:44   ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-19  1:23     ` Dave Chinner
2021-04-07 11:54 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-07 13:32   ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-07 13:43   ` Bharata B Rao
2021-04-07 13:57     ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-07 15:42   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-07 15:42     ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202104051607.NjVgYndS-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.