All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, jthierry@redhat.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:12:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506141211.GE4642@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210503173615.21576-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:36:14PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:

> There are some SYM_CODE functions that are currently in ".text" or
> ".init.text" sections. Some of these are functions that the unwinder
> does not care about as they are not "interesting" to livepatch. These
> will remain in their current sections. The rest I have moved into a
> new section called ".code.text".

I was thinking it'd be good to do this by modifying SYM_CODE_START() to
emit the section, that way nobody can forget to put any SYM_CODE into a
special section.  That does mean we'd have to first introduce a new
variant for specifying a section that lets us override things that need
to be in some specific section and convert everything that's in a
special section over to that first which is a bit annoying but feels
like it's worth it for the robustness.  It'd also put some of the don't
cares into .code.text but so long as they are actually don't cares that
should be fine!

> Don't care functions
> ====================

We also have a bunch of things like __cpu_soft_restart which don't seem
to be called out here but need to be in .idmap.text.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, jthierry@redhat.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text
Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 15:12:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506141211.GE4642@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210503173615.21576-4-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1149 bytes --]

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:36:14PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote:

> There are some SYM_CODE functions that are currently in ".text" or
> ".init.text" sections. Some of these are functions that the unwinder
> does not care about as they are not "interesting" to livepatch. These
> will remain in their current sections. The rest I have moved into a
> new section called ".code.text".

I was thinking it'd be good to do this by modifying SYM_CODE_START() to
emit the section, that way nobody can forget to put any SYM_CODE into a
special section.  That does mean we'd have to first introduce a new
variant for specifying a section that lets us override things that need
to be in some specific section and convert everything that's in a
special section over to that first which is a bit annoying but feels
like it's worth it for the robustness.  It'd also put some of the don't
cares into .code.text but so long as they are actually don't cares that
should be fine!

> Don't care functions
> ====================

We also have a bunch of things like __cpu_soft_restart which don't seem
to be called out here but need to be in .idmap.text.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-06 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <65cf4dfbc439b010b50a0c46ec500432acde86d6>
2021-05-03 17:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] arm64: Stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2021-05-03 17:36   ` madvenka
2021-05-03 17:36   ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] arm64: Introduce stack " madvenka
2021-05-03 17:36     ` madvenka
2021-05-04 15:50     ` Mark Brown
2021-05-04 15:50       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-04 19:14       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-04 19:14         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-04 21:52     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-04 21:52       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-04 23:13       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-04 23:13         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05  0:07         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05  0:07           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-05-05  0:21           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05  0:21             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-03 17:36   ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] arm64: Check the return PC against unreliable code sections madvenka
2021-05-03 17:36     ` madvenka
2021-05-04 16:05     ` Mark Brown
2021-05-04 16:05       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-04 19:03       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-04 19:03         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-04 19:32         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-04 19:32           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 16:46           ` Mark Brown
2021-05-05 16:46             ` Mark Brown
2021-05-05 18:48             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 18:48               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 18:50               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 18:50                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 13:45               ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 13:45                 ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:21                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:21                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 16:34         ` Mark Brown
2021-05-05 16:34           ` Mark Brown
2021-05-05 17:51           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 17:51             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 19:30     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-05 19:30       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-05 20:00       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-05 20:00         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-03 17:36   ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: Handle miscellaneous functions in .text and .init.text madvenka
2021-05-03 17:36     ` madvenka
2021-05-06 14:12     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-05-06 14:12       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:30       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:30         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:32         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:32           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:44           ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:44             ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:56             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:56               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:37         ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:37           ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:57           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:57             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-03 17:36   ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: Handle funtion graph tracer better in the unwinder madvenka
2021-05-03 17:36     ` madvenka
2021-05-06 14:43     ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 14:43       ` Mark Brown
2021-05-06 15:20       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2021-05-06 15:20         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210506141211.GE4642@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.