From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Subject: [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: Move system memory to TTM for discrete Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:07:11 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210602170716.280491-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw) Early implementation of moving system memory for discrete cards over to TTM. We first add the notion of objects being migratable under the object lock to i915 gem, and add some asserts to verify that objects are either locked or pinned when the placement is checked by the gem code. Patch 2 and 3 deals with updating the i915 gem bookkeeping after a TTM move, Patch 4 moves system over from shmem to TTM for discrete and finally the last patch is more to be considered an RFC for migration implementation. Much of this code is not testing covered, so we might have to add some selftests as well. Meanwhile this should not be merged but may well be reviewed. Note that the mock device doesn't consider itself discrete so the TTM system path is not checked by the mock selftests. Also testing if CI can handle base-commit: and prerequisite-patch-id: Thomas Hellström (5): drm/i915: Update object placement flags to be mutable drm/i915/ttm: Adjust gem flags and caching settings after a move drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time drm/i915/ttm: Use TTM for system memory drm/i915/ttm: Implement object migration drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 138 +++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 24 +- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 27 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c | 10 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 267 +++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 4 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_gem_object.c | 4 +- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 5 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c | 4 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_phys.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 8 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.h | 2 + 19 files changed, 437 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) base-commit: cd6eb5f605478f2fff85ec7ac39b7cf445d3deb9 prerequisite-patch-id: b3e7766bc492d04a5ace71fd0d4259689f3bd749 prerequisite-patch-id: 7978430e513e204addd7bc9bef63fd3a9ea25d7c prerequisite-patch-id: f6aa8d141b22b8e532f8152e53f9c913f98458df prerequisite-patch-id: 6486c9db619d88a3e9a4ffc01a89bdc722941a67 prerequisite-patch-id: b71878b47e3be71748aacb5d1b3955853bf80de5 prerequisite-patch-id: 1b67c82c32c02dfdb1217f224652276e044fb549 prerequisite-patch-id: 5229db39ec27eb77a8417ed7c9d54af40e0e9f33 prerequisite-patch-id: b66b1893401cc526b4466ea3c427512261d33dfd prerequisite-patch-id: 706521b6f4858cf4d9ecd83102b347e695b96bb7 prerequisite-patch-id: 686dc7cfea6361c4adabc963996dc3d0d41b28b1 prerequisite-patch-id: 7be87140130a9c2d62a190ceafdacdebd51c5196 -- 2.31.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: Move system memory to TTM for discrete Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:07:11 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210602170716.280491-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw) Early implementation of moving system memory for discrete cards over to TTM. We first add the notion of objects being migratable under the object lock to i915 gem, and add some asserts to verify that objects are either locked or pinned when the placement is checked by the gem code. Patch 2 and 3 deals with updating the i915 gem bookkeeping after a TTM move, Patch 4 moves system over from shmem to TTM for discrete and finally the last patch is more to be considered an RFC for migration implementation. Much of this code is not testing covered, so we might have to add some selftests as well. Meanwhile this should not be merged but may well be reviewed. Note that the mock device doesn't consider itself discrete so the TTM system path is not checked by the mock selftests. Also testing if CI can handle base-commit: and prerequisite-patch-id: Thomas Hellström (5): drm/i915: Update object placement flags to be mutable drm/i915/ttm: Adjust gem flags and caching settings after a move drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time drm/i915/ttm: Use TTM for system memory drm/i915/ttm: Implement object migration drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_internal.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 138 +++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 24 +- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 27 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_phys.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shmem.c | 10 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 267 +++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c | 4 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_gem_object.c | 4 +- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/huge_pages.c | 5 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_mman.c | 4 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_phys.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.h | 8 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.h | 2 + 19 files changed, 437 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-) base-commit: cd6eb5f605478f2fff85ec7ac39b7cf445d3deb9 prerequisite-patch-id: b3e7766bc492d04a5ace71fd0d4259689f3bd749 prerequisite-patch-id: 7978430e513e204addd7bc9bef63fd3a9ea25d7c prerequisite-patch-id: f6aa8d141b22b8e532f8152e53f9c913f98458df prerequisite-patch-id: 6486c9db619d88a3e9a4ffc01a89bdc722941a67 prerequisite-patch-id: b71878b47e3be71748aacb5d1b3955853bf80de5 prerequisite-patch-id: 1b67c82c32c02dfdb1217f224652276e044fb549 prerequisite-patch-id: 5229db39ec27eb77a8417ed7c9d54af40e0e9f33 prerequisite-patch-id: b66b1893401cc526b4466ea3c427512261d33dfd prerequisite-patch-id: 706521b6f4858cf4d9ecd83102b347e695b96bb7 prerequisite-patch-id: 686dc7cfea6361c4adabc963996dc3d0d41b28b1 prerequisite-patch-id: 7be87140130a9c2d62a190ceafdacdebd51c5196 -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-02 17:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-02 17:07 Thomas Hellström [this message] 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: Move system memory to TTM for discrete Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Update object placement flags to be mutable Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 11:17 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 11:17 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 14:08 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 14:08 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/ttm: Adjust gem flags and caching settings after a move Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 10:35 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 10:35 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 13:40 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 13:40 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/ttm: Calculate the object placement at get_pages time Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 10:58 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 10:58 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/ttm: Use TTM for system memory Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 9:48 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 9:48 ` Matthew Auld 2021-06-03 14:27 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-03 14:27 ` Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/ttm: Implement object migration Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström 2021-06-02 17:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Move system memory to TTM for discrete Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210602170716.280491-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \ --to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.