[PATCH] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: clean up for-loop indentation in switch statement

[PATCH] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: clean up for-loop indentation in switch statement

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The for-loop is not indented enough and needs one more level
of indentation. Add in the indentation across the block of code.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/lpass-rx-macro.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-rx-macro.c b/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-rx-macro.c
index 3622961f7c2c..196b06898eeb 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-rx-macro.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/lpass-rx-macro.c
@@ -1722,42 +1722,43 @@ static int rx_macro_digital_mute(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int mute, int stream)
 	case RX_MACRO_AIF2_PB:
 	case RX_MACRO_AIF3_PB:
 	case RX_MACRO_AIF4_PB:
-	for (j = 0; j < INTERP_MAX; j++) {
-		reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_CTL(j);
-		mix_reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_MIX_CTL(j);
-		dsm_reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_DSM_CTL(j);
-
-		if (mute) {
-			snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg,
-						      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK,
-						      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_ENABLE);
-			snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, mix_reg,
-						      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK,
-						      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_ENABLE);
-		} else {
-			snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg,
-						      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK, 0x0);
-			snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, mix_reg,
-						      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK, 0x0);
-		}
-
-		if (j == INTERP_AUX)
-			dsm_reg = CDC_RX_RX2_RX_PATH_DSM_CTL;
+		for (j = 0; j < INTERP_MAX; j++) {
+			reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_CTL(j);
+			mix_reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_MIX_CTL(j);
+			dsm_reg = CDC_RX_RXn_RX_PATH_DSM_CTL(j);
+
+			if (mute) {
+				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg,
+							      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK,
+							      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_ENABLE);
+				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, mix_reg,
+							      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK,
+							      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_ENABLE);
+			} else {
+				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg,
+							      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK, 0x0);
+				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, mix_reg,
+							      CDC_RX_PATH_PGA_MUTE_MASK, 0x0);
+			}
 
-		int_mux_cfg0 = CDC_RX_INP_MUX_RX_INT0_CFG0 + j * 8;
-		int_mux_cfg1 = int_mux_cfg0 + 4;
-		int_mux_cfg0_val = snd_soc_component_read(component, int_mux_cfg0);
-		int_mux_cfg1_val = snd_soc_component_read(component, int_mux_cfg1);
+			if (j == INTERP_AUX)
+				dsm_reg = CDC_RX_RX2_RX_PATH_DSM_CTL;
 
-		if (snd_soc_component_read(component, dsm_reg) & 0x01) {
-			if (int_mux_cfg0_val || (int_mux_cfg1_val & 0xF0))
-				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg, 0x20, 0x20);
-			if (int_mux_cfg1_val & 0x0F) {
-				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg, 0x20, 0x20);
-				snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, mix_reg, 0x20, 0x20);
+			int_mux_cfg0 = CDC_RX_INP_MUX_RX_INT0_CFG0 + j * 8;
+			int_mux_cfg1 = int_mux_cfg0 + 4;
+			int_mux_cfg0_val = snd_soc_component_read(component, int_mux_cfg0);
+			int_mux_cfg1_val = snd_soc_component_read(component, int_mux_cfg1);
+
+			if (snd_soc_component_read(component, dsm_reg) & 0x01) {
+				if (int_mux_cfg0_val || (int_mux_cfg1_val & 0xF0))
+					snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg, 0x20, 0x20);
+				if (int_mux_cfg1_val & 0x0F) {
+					snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, reg, 0x20, 0x20);
+					snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, mix_reg, 0x20,
+								      0x20);
+				}
 			}
 		}
-	}
 		break;
 	default:
 		break;
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: clean up for-loop indentation in switch statement

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:24:24 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> The for-loop is not indented enough and needs one more level
> of indentation. Add in the indentation across the block of code.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: codecs: lpass-rx-macro: clean up for-loop indentation in switch statement
      commit: 622d9ac3d969d0f62bbe68f4844bb5b8adea5a40

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark