[PATCH] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray

* [PATCH] staging: greybus: Convert uart.c from IDR to XArray
@ 2021-08-14 17:56 Fabio M. De Francesco
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Fabio M. De Francesco @ 2021-08-14 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman, greybus-dev,
	linux-staging, linux-kernel
  Cc: Fabio M. De Francesco, kernel test robot

Convert greybus/uart.c from IDR to XArray. The abstract data type XArray
is more memory-efficient, parallelisable, and cache friendly. It takes
advantage of RCU to perform lookups without locking. Furthermore, IDR is
deprecated because XArray has a better (cleaner and more consistent) API.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
---

v1->v2:
	Fixed an issue found by the kernel test robot. It was due to
	passing to xa_*lock() the same old mutex that IDR used with
	the previous version of the code.

 drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
index 73f01ed1e5b7..5bf993e40f84 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/uart.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/serial.h>
 #include <linux/tty_driver.h>
 #include <linux/tty_flip.h>
-#include <linux/idr.h>
+#include <linux/xarray.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/kdev_t.h>
 #include <linux/kfifo.h>
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "gbphy.h"
 
 #define GB_NUM_MINORS	16	/* 16 is more than enough */
+#define GB_RANGE_MINORS		XA_LIMIT(0, GB_NUM_MINORS)
 #define GB_NAME		"ttyGB"
 
 #define GB_UART_WRITE_FIFO_SIZE		PAGE_SIZE
@@ -67,8 +68,7 @@ struct gb_tty {
 };
 
 static struct tty_driver *gb_tty_driver;
-static DEFINE_IDR(tty_minors);
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(table_lock);
+static DEFINE_XARRAY(tty_minors);
 
 static int gb_uart_receive_data_handler(struct gb_operation *op)
 {
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static int gb_uart_receive_data_handler(struct gb_operation *op)
 	struct tty_port *port = &gb_tty->port;
 	struct gb_message *request = op->request;
 	struct gb_uart_recv_data_request *receive_data;
+
 	u16 recv_data_size;
 	int count;
 	unsigned long tty_flags = TTY_NORMAL;
@@ -341,8 +342,8 @@ static struct gb_tty *get_gb_by_minor(unsigned int minor)
 {
 	struct gb_tty *gb_tty;
 
-	mutex_lock(&table_lock);
-	gb_tty = idr_find(&tty_minors, minor);
+	xa_lock(&tty_minors);
+	gb_tty = xa_load(&tty_minors, minor);
 	if (gb_tty) {
 		mutex_lock(&gb_tty->mutex);
 		if (gb_tty->disconnected) {
@@ -353,19 +354,19 @@ static struct gb_tty *get_gb_by_minor(unsigned int minor)
 			mutex_unlock(&gb_tty->mutex);
 		}
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&table_lock);
+	xa_unlock(&tty_minors);
 	return gb_tty;
 }
 
 static int alloc_minor(struct gb_tty *gb_tty)
 {
 	int minor;
+	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&table_lock);
-	minor = idr_alloc(&tty_minors, gb_tty, 0, GB_NUM_MINORS, GFP_KERNEL);
-	mutex_unlock(&table_lock);
-	if (minor >= 0)
-		gb_tty->minor = minor;
+	ret = xa_alloc(&tty_minors, &minor, gb_tty, GB_RANGE_MINORS, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	gb_tty->minor = minor;
 	return minor;
 }
 
@@ -374,9 +375,7 @@ static void release_minor(struct gb_tty *gb_tty)
 	int minor = gb_tty->minor;
 
 	gb_tty->minor = 0;	/* Maybe should use an invalid value instead */
-	mutex_lock(&table_lock);
-	idr_remove(&tty_minors, minor);
-	mutex_unlock(&table_lock);
+	xa_erase(&tty_minors, minor);
 }
 
 static int gb_tty_install(struct tty_driver *driver, struct tty_struct *tty)
@@ -982,7 +981,7 @@ static void gb_tty_exit(void)
 {
 	tty_unregister_driver(gb_tty_driver);
 	put_tty_driver(gb_tty_driver);
-	idr_destroy(&tty_minors);
+	xa_destroy(&tty_minors);
 }
 
 static const struct gbphy_device_id gb_uart_id_table[] = {
-- 
2.32.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread