All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:54:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

This series overhauls the selftests we have for the SVE ptrace interface
to make them much more comprehensive than they are currently, making the
coverage of the data read and written more complete.  The new coverage
for setting data on all vector lengths showed the issue with using the
wrong buffer size with ptrace reported and fixed by:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210909165356.10675-1-broonie@kernel.org/

(arm64/sve: Use correct size when reinitialising SVE state).

Mark Brown (8):
  selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to
    be run
  selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace
    test
  selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code
  selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing
  selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set
  selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register
    sets
  selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface
  selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function

 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile     |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/TODO         |   9 +-
 .../selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace-asm.S       |  33 --
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 460 ++++++++++++------
 4 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace-asm.S


base-commit: 6880fa6c56601bb8ed59df6c30fd390cc5f6dd8f
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:54:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

This series overhauls the selftests we have for the SVE ptrace interface
to make them much more comprehensive than they are currently, making the
coverage of the data read and written more complete.  The new coverage
for setting data on all vector lengths showed the issue with using the
wrong buffer size with ptrace reported and fixed by:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210909165356.10675-1-broonie@kernel.org/

(arm64/sve: Use correct size when reinitialising SVE state).

Mark Brown (8):
  selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to
    be run
  selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace
    test
  selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code
  selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing
  selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set
  selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register
    sets
  selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface
  selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function

 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile     |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/TODO         |   9 +-
 .../selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace-asm.S       |  33 --
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 460 ++++++++++++------
 4 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace-asm.S


base-commit: 6880fa6c56601bb8ed59df6c30fd390cc5f6dd8f
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-13 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-13 12:54 Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to be run Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace test Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register sets Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 17:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Will Deacon
2021-09-29 17:48   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.