All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] vfio/ccw: Use functions for alloc/free of the vfio_ccw_private
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:03:50 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210914180350.GG4065468@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfy7gnr2.fsf@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:50:25PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10 2021, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:38:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> +
> >> +	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> >> +	if (!private)
> >> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > Nit: there is no need to add GFP_KERNEL when using GFP_DMA.
> >
> > Also a question to the s390 maintainers: why do we need 31-bit
> > addressability for the main private data structure?
> 
> I don't think we need it anymore since c98e16b2fa12 ("s390/cio: Convert
> ccw_io_region to pointer") and probably should just drop the GFP_DMA.

I added this to the series:

From 0d40f9c57430400a81aa60920b70761535967048 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:21:49 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/ccw: Remove unneeded GFP_DMA

Since the ccw_io_region was split out of the private the allocation no
longer needs the GFP_DMA. Remove it.

Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Fixes: c98e16b2fa12 ("s390/cio: Convert ccw_io_region to pointer")
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 76099bcb765b45..371558ec92045d 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
+	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!private)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.33.0



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/9] vfio/ccw: Use functions for alloc/free of the vfio_ccw_private
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:03:50 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210914180350.GG4065468@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sfy7gnr2.fsf@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:50:25PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10 2021, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 04:38:41PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> +
> >> +	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
> >> +	if (!private)
> >> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > Nit: there is no need to add GFP_KERNEL when using GFP_DMA.
> >
> > Also a question to the s390 maintainers: why do we need 31-bit
> > addressability for the main private data structure?
> 
> I don't think we need it anymore since c98e16b2fa12 ("s390/cio: Convert
> ccw_io_region to pointer") and probably should just drop the GFP_DMA.

I added this to the series:

From 0d40f9c57430400a81aa60920b70761535967048 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 14:21:49 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] vfio/ccw: Remove unneeded GFP_DMA

Since the ccw_io_region was split out of the private the allocation no
longer needs the GFP_DMA. Remove it.

Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Fixes: c98e16b2fa12 ("s390/cio: Convert ccw_io_region to pointer")
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 76099bcb765b45..371558ec92045d 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int vfio_ccw_sch_probe(struct subchannel *sch)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
+	private = kzalloc(sizeof(*private), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!private)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.33.0



  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-09 19:38 [PATCH v2 0/9] Move vfio_ccw to the new mdev API Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] vfio/ccw: Use functions for alloc/free of the vfio_ccw_private Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-10 11:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-10 11:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-14 15:50     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-14 15:50       ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-14 18:03       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-09-14 18:03         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-24  2:53   ` Eric Farman
2021-09-24  2:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] vfio/ccw: Pass vfio_ccw_private not mdev_device to various functions Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-10 11:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-10 11:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-20 11:12   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-20 11:12     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-24  2:53   ` Eric Farman
2021-09-24  2:53     ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] vfio/ccw: Convert to use vfio_register_group_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-24 20:37   ` Eric Farman
2021-09-24 20:37     ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-27 12:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-27 12:17       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] vfio/ccw: Make the FSM complete and synchronize it to the mdev Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-20 12:19   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-20 12:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-20 12:30     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-20 12:30       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] vfio/mdev: Consolidate all the device_api sysfs into the core code Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-10 12:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-10 12:10     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-10 13:38     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-10 13:38       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-10 16:09       ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-10 16:09         ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] vfio/mdev: Add mdev available instance checking to the core Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-10 12:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-10 12:25     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-20 18:02   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-20 18:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-21 13:19     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-21 13:19       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-24  2:54       ` Eric Farman
2021-09-24  2:54         ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] vfio/ccw: Remove private->mdev Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-24 20:45   ` Eric Farman
2021-09-24 20:45     ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-27 12:32     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-27 12:32       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-27 20:45       ` Eric Farman
2021-09-27 20:45         ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] vfio: Export vfio_device_try_get() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] vfio/ccw: Move the lifecycle of the struct vfio_ccw_private to the mdev Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:38   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-09 19:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Move vfio_ccw to the new mdev API Patchwork
2021-09-13 17:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] " Eric Farman
2021-09-13 17:40   ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-13 19:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-13 19:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-13 20:31     ` Eric Farman
2021-09-13 20:31       ` [Intel-gfx] " Eric Farman
2021-09-14 13:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-14 13:36         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-17 11:59         ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-17 11:59           ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-17 12:51           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-17 12:51             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-17 14:37             ` Cornelia Huck
2021-09-17 14:37               ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-09-14 13:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Move vfio_ccw to the new mdev API (rev2) Patchwork
2021-09-14 18:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Move vfio_ccw to the new mdev API (rev3) Patchwork
2021-09-21 15:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Move vfio_ccw to the new mdev API (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210914180350.GG4065468@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.