All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:38:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929153856.GS4199@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929153511.GB22029@willie-the-truck>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 610 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:35:12PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:43:23PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm not sure it's a particularly good idea to run kselftest as a
> > non-root user TBH, it's going to cause you to skip a lot of tests.

> Ah, thanks for pointing that out. It would probably be better to skip the
> tests rather than fail them if they're not running with sufficient
> permissions, but I'll go ahead and queue your v3 for now.

Yes, that's what my v3 does - it skips the new test if it failed to
enumerate minimum and maximum vector lengths, like the other tests do.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:38:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929153856.GS4199@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929153511.GB22029@willie-the-truck>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 610 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:35:12PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:43:23PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I'm not sure it's a particularly good idea to run kselftest as a
> > non-root user TBH, it's going to cause you to skip a lot of tests.

> Ah, thanks for pointing that out. It would probably be better to skip the
> tests rather than fail them if they're not running with sufficient
> permissions, but I'll go ahead and queue your v3 for now.

Yes, that's what my v3 does - it skips the new test if it failed to
enumerate minimum and maximum vector lengths, like the other tests do.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-29 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17 12:08 [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests: arm64: Fix printf() format mismatch in vec-syscfg Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests: arm64: Remove bogus error check on writing to files Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:26   ` misono.tomohiro
2021-09-17 12:26     ` misono.tomohiro
2021-09-29 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates Will Deacon
2021-09-29 14:31   ` Will Deacon
2021-09-29 14:43   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 14:43     ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 15:35     ` Will Deacon
2021-09-29 15:35       ` Will Deacon
2021-09-29 15:38       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-29 15:38         ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 16:26       ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-29 16:26         ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-29 16:37         ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 16:37           ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 18:23           ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-29 18:23             ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210929153856.GS4199@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.