[RFC PATCH] ima: ima_fs_ns_permission() can be static

[kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1289 bytes --]

security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:543:5: warning: symbol 'ima_fs_ns_permission' was not declared. Should it be static?
security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:550:31: warning: symbol 'ima_fs_ns_inode_operations' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
 ima_fs.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index 9a14be520268f..760f0a2ad0c82 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -540,14 +540,14 @@ static void ima_fs_ns_fixup_uid_gid(struct ima_namespace *ns)
 }
 
 /* Fix the permissions when a file is opened */
-int ima_fs_ns_permission(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
-			 int mask)
+static int ima_fs_ns_permission(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
+				int mask)
 {
 	ima_fs_ns_fixup_uid_gid(get_current_ns());
 	return generic_permission(mnt_userns, inode, mask);
 }
 
-const struct inode_operations ima_fs_ns_inode_operations = {
+static const struct inode_operations ima_fs_ns_inode_operations = {
 	.lookup		= simple_lookup,
 	.permission	= ima_fs_ns_permission,
 };