From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: protect access to rawnand devices while in suspend
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:43:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117074339.ctuaxnetz47j45z4@skn-laptop.hadsten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220130015.3630975-1-sean@geanix.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> Prevent rawnend access while in a suspended state.
>
> Commit 013e6292aaf5 ("mtd: rawnand: Simplify the locking") allows the
> rawnand layer to return errors rather than waiting in a blocking wait.
>
> Tested on a iMX6ULL.
>
> Fixes: 013e6292aaf5 ("mtd: rawnand: Simplify the locking")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
> ---
Hi Boris and Miquel,
I know the kernel test robot is complaining a bit about uninitialized
values.
But is this OK? If I fix the unitialized values?
/Sean
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: protect access to rawnand devices while in suspend
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:43:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117074339.ctuaxnetz47j45z4@skn-laptop.hadsten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220130015.3630975-1-sean@geanix.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> Prevent rawnend access while in a suspended state.
>
> Commit 013e6292aaf5 ("mtd: rawnand: Simplify the locking") allows the
> rawnand layer to return errors rather than waiting in a blocking wait.
>
> Tested on a iMX6ULL.
>
> Fixes: 013e6292aaf5 ("mtd: rawnand: Simplify the locking")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com>
> ---
Hi Boris and Miquel,
I know the kernel test robot is complaining a bit about uninitialized
values.
But is this OK? If I fix the unitialized values?
/Sean
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 13:00 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: protect access to rawnand devices while in suspend Sean Nyekjaer
2021-12-20 13:00 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2021-12-20 18:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-20 18:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-12-20 18:54 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-17 7:43 ` Sean Nyekjaer [this message]
2022-01-17 7:43 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2022-01-17 7:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2022-01-17 7:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-12-22 13:41 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220117074339.ctuaxnetz47j45z4@skn-laptop.hadsten \
--to=sean@geanix.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.