From: Myrtle Shah <gatecat@ds0.me> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Fix XIP_FIXUP_FLASH_OFFSET Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:28:27 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220120152828.4089364-2-gatecat@ds0.me> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220120152828.4089364-1-gatecat@ds0.me> There were several problems with the calculation. Not only was an 'and' being computed into t1 but thrown away; but the 'and' itself would cause problems if the granularity of the XIP physical address was less than XIP_OFFSET - in my case I had the kernel image at 2MB in SPI flash. I believe this approach is more generic. Fixes: f9ace4ede49b ("riscv: remove .text section size limitation for XIP") Signed-off-by: Myrtle Shah <gatecat@ds0.me> --- arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S index 604d60292dd8..b1ca65abeb1e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S @@ -21,14 +21,13 @@ add \reg, \reg, t0 .endm .macro XIP_FIXUP_FLASH_OFFSET reg - la t1, __data_loc - li t0, XIP_OFFSET_MASK - and t1, t1, t0 - li t1, XIP_OFFSET - sub t0, t0, t1 - sub \reg, \reg, t0 + la t0, __data_loc + REG_L t1, _xip_phys_offset + sub \reg, \reg, t1 + add \reg, \reg, t0 .endm _xip_fixup: .dword CONFIG_PHYS_RAM_BASE - CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR - XIP_OFFSET +_xip_phys_offset: .dword CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR + XIP_OFFSET #else .macro XIP_FIXUP_OFFSET reg .endm -- 2.34.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Myrtle Shah <gatecat@ds0.me> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Fix XIP_FIXUP_FLASH_OFFSET Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:28:27 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220120152828.4089364-2-gatecat@ds0.me> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220120152828.4089364-1-gatecat@ds0.me> There were several problems with the calculation. Not only was an 'and' being computed into t1 but thrown away; but the 'and' itself would cause problems if the granularity of the XIP physical address was less than XIP_OFFSET - in my case I had the kernel image at 2MB in SPI flash. I believe this approach is more generic. Fixes: f9ace4ede49b ("riscv: remove .text section size limitation for XIP") Signed-off-by: Myrtle Shah <gatecat@ds0.me> --- arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S index 604d60292dd8..b1ca65abeb1e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S @@ -21,14 +21,13 @@ add \reg, \reg, t0 .endm .macro XIP_FIXUP_FLASH_OFFSET reg - la t1, __data_loc - li t0, XIP_OFFSET_MASK - and t1, t1, t0 - li t1, XIP_OFFSET - sub t0, t0, t1 - sub \reg, \reg, t0 + la t0, __data_loc + REG_L t1, _xip_phys_offset + sub \reg, \reg, t1 + add \reg, \reg, t0 .endm _xip_fixup: .dword CONFIG_PHYS_RAM_BASE - CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR - XIP_OFFSET +_xip_phys_offset: .dword CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR + XIP_OFFSET #else .macro XIP_FIXUP_OFFSET reg .endm -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-20 15:33 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-20 15:28 Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:28 ` Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:28 ` Myrtle Shah [this message] 2022-01-20 15:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Fix XIP_FIXUP_FLASH_OFFSET Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] riscv/mm: Add some missing XIP_FIXUPs Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:28 ` Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:37 ` Vitaly Wool 2022-01-20 15:37 ` Re: Vitaly Wool 2022-01-20 23:29 ` Re: Damien Le Moal 2022-01-20 23:29 ` Re: Damien Le Moal 2022-02-04 21:45 ` Re: Palmer Dabbelt 2022-02-04 21:45 ` Re: Palmer Dabbelt 2022-01-20 15:33 [PATCH 0/2] riscv: Fixes for XIP support Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: Fix XIP_FIXUP_FLASH_OFFSET Myrtle Shah 2022-01-20 15:33 ` Myrtle Shah
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220120152828.4089364-2-gatecat@ds0.me \ --to=gatecat@ds0.me \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.