* [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec()
@ 2022-02-20 7:27 Yuntao Wang
2022-02-20 20:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-22 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yuntao Wang @ 2022-02-20 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh, Yuntao Wang
The check 't->size && t->size != size' is redundant because if t->size
compares unequal to 0, we will just skip straight to sorting variables.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index ad43b6ce825e..7e978feaf822 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ static int btf_fixup_datasec(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf,
goto sort_vars;
ret = find_elf_sec_sz(obj, name, &size);
- if (ret || !size || (t->size && t->size != size)) {
+ if (ret || !size) {
pr_debug("Invalid size for section %s: %u bytes\n", name, size);
return -ENOENT;
}
--
2.35.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec()
2022-02-20 7:27 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec() Yuntao Wang
@ 2022-02-20 20:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-20 20:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-22 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-02-20 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuntao Wang
Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 11:29 PM Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The check 't->size && t->size != size' is redundant because if t->size
> compares unequal to 0, we will just skip straight to sorting variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index ad43b6ce825e..7e978feaf822 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ static int btf_fixup_datasec(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf,
> goto sort_vars;
>
> ret = find_elf_sec_sz(obj, name, &size);
> - if (ret || !size || (t->size && t->size != size)) {
t->size check is redundant, but (t->size != size) is not
> + if (ret || !size) {
> pr_debug("Invalid size for section %s: %u bytes\n", name, size);
> return -ENOENT;
> }
> --
> 2.35.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec()
2022-02-20 20:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-02-20 20:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-21 16:22 ` Yuntao Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2022-02-20 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuntao Wang
Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko,
Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
KP Singh
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:15 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 11:29 PM Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The check 't->size && t->size != size' is redundant because if t->size
> > compares unequal to 0, we will just skip straight to sorting variables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index ad43b6ce825e..7e978feaf822 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ static int btf_fixup_datasec(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf,
> > goto sort_vars;
> >
> > ret = find_elf_sec_sz(obj, name, &size);
> > - if (ret || !size || (t->size && t->size != size)) {
>
> t->size check is redundant, but (t->size != size) is not
ah, never mind :) applied to bpf-next
>
> > + if (ret || !size) {
> > pr_debug("Invalid size for section %s: %u bytes\n", name, size);
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec()
2022-02-20 20:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-02-21 16:22 ` Yuntao Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yuntao Wang @ 2022-02-21 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrii.nakryiko
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, john.fastabend, kafai, kpsingh,
songliubraving, yhs, ytcoode
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:19 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:15 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 11:29 PM Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The check 't->size && t->size != size' is redundant because if t->size
> > > compares unequal to 0, we will just skip straight to sorting variables.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > > index ad43b6ce825e..7e978feaf822 100644
> > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > > @@ -2795,7 +2795,7 @@ static int btf_fixup_datasec(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf,
> > > goto sort_vars;
> > >
> > > ret = find_elf_sec_sz(obj, name, &size);
> > > - if (ret || !size || (t->size && t->size != size)) {
> >
> > t->size check is redundant, but (t->size != size) is not
>
> ah, never mind :) applied to bpf-next
>
> >
> > > + if (ret || !size) {
> > > pr_debug("Invalid size for section %s: %u bytes\n", name, size);
> > > return -ENOENT;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
Thanks for your reply.
It seems that the patch has not been applied to bpf-next yet,
I can't find it in the commits on the master branch.
Is there anything else I need to do?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec()
2022-02-20 7:27 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec() Yuntao Wang
2022-02-20 20:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2022-02-22 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-02-22 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuntao Wang
Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, kafai, songliubraving, yhs,
john.fastabend, kpsingh
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 15:27:50 +0800 you wrote:
> The check 't->size && t->size != size' is redundant because if t->size
> compares unequal to 0, we will just skip straight to sorting variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6966d4c4425b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-22 22:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-20 7:27 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Remove redundant check in btf_fixup_datasec() Yuntao Wang
2022-02-20 20:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-20 20:19 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-02-21 16:22 ` Yuntao Wang
2022-02-22 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.