From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> To: palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com, guoren@kernel.org, mick@ics.forth.gr, samuel@sholland.org, cmuellner@linux.com, philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, hch@lst.de, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] riscv: make patch-function pointer more generic in cpu_manufacturer_info struct Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 19:02:53 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220518170254.3178923-4-heiko@sntech.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220518170254.3178923-1-heiko@sntech.de> During review the naming of the function-pointer was called confusing as the vendor id is just one of three inputs for the patching and indeed it serves no real purpose, as with recent changes the function pointer is not a static global element anymore, so drop the "vendor_" prefix. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c index c9d0d3c53223..a7d26a00beea 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct cpu_manufacturer_info_t { unsigned long vendor_id; unsigned long arch_id; unsigned long imp_id; - void (*vendor_patch_func)(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end, + void (*patch_func)(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end, unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid, unsigned int stage); }; @@ -40,16 +40,16 @@ static void __init_or_module riscv_fill_cpu_mfr_info(struct cpu_manufacturer_inf switch (cpu_mfr_info->vendor_id) { #ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE case SIFIVE_VENDOR_ID: - cpu_mfr_info->vendor_patch_func = sifive_errata_patch_func; + cpu_mfr_info->patch_func = sifive_errata_patch_func; break; #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD case THEAD_VENDOR_ID: - cpu_mfr_info->vendor_patch_func = thead_errata_patch_func; + cpu_mfr_info->patch_func = thead_errata_patch_func; break; #endif default: - cpu_mfr_info->vendor_patch_func = NULL; + cpu_mfr_info->patch_func = NULL; } } @@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static void __init_or_module _apply_alternatives(struct alt_entry *begin, riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(begin, end, stage); - if (!cpu_mfr_info.vendor_patch_func) + if (!cpu_mfr_info.patch_func) return; - cpu_mfr_info.vendor_patch_func(begin, end, - cpu_mfr_info.arch_id, - cpu_mfr_info.imp_id, - stage); + cpu_mfr_info.patch_func(begin, end, + cpu_mfr_info.arch_id, + cpu_mfr_info.imp_id, + stage); } void __init apply_boot_alternatives(void) -- 2.35.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> To: palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wefu@redhat.com, guoren@kernel.org, mick@ics.forth.gr, samuel@sholland.org, cmuellner@linux.com, philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, hch@lst.de, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] riscv: make patch-function pointer more generic in cpu_manufacturer_info struct Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 19:02:53 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20220518170254.3178923-4-heiko@sntech.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220518170254.3178923-1-heiko@sntech.de> During review the naming of the function-pointer was called confusing as the vendor id is just one of three inputs for the patching and indeed it serves no real purpose, as with recent changes the function pointer is not a static global element anymore, so drop the "vendor_" prefix. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c index c9d0d3c53223..a7d26a00beea 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct cpu_manufacturer_info_t { unsigned long vendor_id; unsigned long arch_id; unsigned long imp_id; - void (*vendor_patch_func)(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end, + void (*patch_func)(struct alt_entry *begin, struct alt_entry *end, unsigned long archid, unsigned long impid, unsigned int stage); }; @@ -40,16 +40,16 @@ static void __init_or_module riscv_fill_cpu_mfr_info(struct cpu_manufacturer_inf switch (cpu_mfr_info->vendor_id) { #ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE case SIFIVE_VENDOR_ID: - cpu_mfr_info->vendor_patch_func = sifive_errata_patch_func; + cpu_mfr_info->patch_func = sifive_errata_patch_func; break; #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD case THEAD_VENDOR_ID: - cpu_mfr_info->vendor_patch_func = thead_errata_patch_func; + cpu_mfr_info->patch_func = thead_errata_patch_func; break; #endif default: - cpu_mfr_info->vendor_patch_func = NULL; + cpu_mfr_info->patch_func = NULL; } } @@ -68,13 +68,13 @@ static void __init_or_module _apply_alternatives(struct alt_entry *begin, riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(begin, end, stage); - if (!cpu_mfr_info.vendor_patch_func) + if (!cpu_mfr_info.patch_func) return; - cpu_mfr_info.vendor_patch_func(begin, end, - cpu_mfr_info.arch_id, - cpu_mfr_info.imp_id, - stage); + cpu_mfr_info.patch_func(begin, end, + cpu_mfr_info.arch_id, + cpu_mfr_info.imp_id, + stage); } void __init apply_boot_alternatives(void) -- 2.35.1 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 17:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-05-18 17:02 [PATCH 0/4] riscv: some svpbmt fixes Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] riscv: drop cpufeature_apply_feature tracking variable Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] riscv: Improve description for RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT Kconfig symbol Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message] 2022-05-18 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] riscv: make patch-function pointer more generic in cpu_manufacturer_info struct Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] riscv: fix dependency for t-head errata Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-18 17:02 ` Heiko Stuebner 2022-05-20 7:55 ` Guo Ren 2022-05-20 7:55 ` Guo Ren 2022-05-26 20:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] riscv: some svpbmt fixes Heiko Stübner 2022-05-26 20:58 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220518170254.3178923-4-heiko@sntech.de \ --to=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=cmuellner@linux.com \ --cc=guoren@kernel.org \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \ --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \ --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \ --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \ --cc=samuel@sholland.org \ --cc=wefu@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.