All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Cc: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	system@metrotek.ru
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: microchip-spi: move SPI I/O buffers out of stack
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 17:23:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221226142326.8111-2-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221226142326.8111-1-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>

As spi-summary doc says:
 > I/O buffers use the usual Linux rules, and must be DMA-safe.
 > You'd normally allocate them from the heap or free page pool.
 > Don't use the stack, or anything that's declared "static".

Replace spi_write() with spi_write_then_read(), which is dma-safe for
on-stack buffers. Use allocated buffers for transfers used in
spi_sync_transfer().

Although everything works OK with stack-located I/O buffers, better
follow the doc to be safe.

Fixes: 5f8d4a900830 ("fpga: microchip-spi: add Microchip MPF FPGA manager")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
---
 drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
index 7436976ea904..e72fedd93a27 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
@@ -42,46 +42,55 @@
 struct mpf_priv {
 	struct spi_device *spi;
 	bool program_mode;
+	u8 tx __aligned(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN);
+	u8 rx __aligned(ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN);
 };
 
-static int mpf_read_status(struct spi_device *spi)
+static int mpf_read_status(struct mpf_priv *priv)
 {
-	u8 status = 0, status_command = MPF_SPI_READ_STATUS;
-	struct spi_transfer xfers[2] = { 0 };
-	int ret;
-
 	/*
 	 * HW status is returned on MISO in the first byte after CS went
 	 * active. However, first reading can be inadequate, so we submit
 	 * two identical SPI transfers and use result of the later one.
 	 */
-	xfers[0].tx_buf = &status_command;
-	xfers[1].tx_buf = &status_command;
-	xfers[0].rx_buf = &status;
-	xfers[1].rx_buf = &status;
-	xfers[0].len = 1;
-	xfers[1].len = 1;
-	xfers[0].cs_change = 1;
+	struct spi_transfer xfers[2] = {
+		{
+			.tx_buf = &priv->tx,
+			.rx_buf = &priv->rx,
+			.len = 1,
+			.cs_change = 1,
+		}, {
+			.tx_buf = &priv->tx,
+			.rx_buf = &priv->rx,
+			.len = 1,
+		},
+	};
+	u8 status;
+	int ret;
+
+	priv->tx = MPF_SPI_READ_STATUS;
+
+	ret = spi_sync_transfer(priv->spi, xfers, 2);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-	ret = spi_sync_transfer(spi, xfers, 2);
+	status = priv->rx;
 
 	if ((status & MPF_STATUS_SPI_VIOLATION) ||
 	    (status & MPF_STATUS_SPI_ERROR))
-		ret = -EIO;
+		return -EIO;
 
-	return ret ? : status;
+	return status;
 }
 
 static enum fpga_mgr_states mpf_ops_state(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
 {
 	struct mpf_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
-	struct spi_device *spi;
 	bool program_mode;
 	int status;
 
-	spi = priv->spi;
 	program_mode = priv->program_mode;
-	status = mpf_read_status(spi);
+	status = mpf_read_status(priv);
 
 	if (!program_mode && !status)
 		return FPGA_MGR_STATE_OPERATING;
@@ -186,12 +195,12 @@ static int mpf_ops_parse_header(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 }
 
 /* Poll HW status until busy bit is cleared and mask bits are set. */
-static int mpf_poll_status(struct spi_device *spi, u8 mask)
+static int mpf_poll_status(struct mpf_priv *priv, u8 mask)
 {
 	int status, retries = MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES;
 
 	while (retries--) {
-		status = mpf_read_status(spi);
+		status = mpf_read_status(priv);
 		if (status < 0)
 			return status;
 
@@ -205,32 +214,32 @@ static int mpf_poll_status(struct spi_device *spi, u8 mask)
 	return -EBUSY;
 }
 
-static int mpf_spi_write(struct spi_device *spi, const void *buf, size_t buf_size)
+static int mpf_spi_write(struct mpf_priv *priv, const void *buf, size_t buf_size)
 {
-	int status = mpf_poll_status(spi, 0);
+	int status = mpf_poll_status(priv, 0);
 
 	if (status < 0)
 		return status;
 
-	return spi_write(spi, buf, buf_size);
+	return spi_write_then_read(priv->spi, buf, buf_size, NULL, 0);
 }
 
-static int mpf_spi_write_then_read(struct spi_device *spi,
+static int mpf_spi_write_then_read(struct mpf_priv *priv,
 				   const void *txbuf, size_t txbuf_size,
 				   void *rxbuf, size_t rxbuf_size)
 {
 	const u8 read_command[] = { MPF_SPI_READ_DATA };
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = mpf_spi_write(spi, txbuf, txbuf_size);
+	ret = mpf_spi_write(priv, txbuf, txbuf_size);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = mpf_poll_status(spi, MPF_STATUS_READY);
+	ret = mpf_poll_status(priv, MPF_STATUS_READY);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	return spi_write_then_read(spi, read_command, sizeof(read_command),
+	return spi_write_then_read(priv->spi, read_command, sizeof(read_command),
 				   rxbuf, rxbuf_size);
 }
 
@@ -242,7 +251,6 @@ static int mpf_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 	const u8 isc_en_command[] = { MPF_SPI_ISC_ENABLE };
 	struct mpf_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
 	struct device *dev = &mgr->dev;
-	struct spi_device *spi;
 	u32 isc_ret = 0;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -251,9 +259,7 @@ static int mpf_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
-	spi = priv->spi;
-
-	ret = mpf_spi_write_then_read(spi, isc_en_command, sizeof(isc_en_command),
+	ret = mpf_spi_write_then_read(priv, isc_en_command, sizeof(isc_en_command),
 				      &isc_ret, sizeof(isc_ret));
 	if (ret || isc_ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable ISC: spi_ret %d, isc_ret %u\n",
@@ -261,7 +267,7 @@ static int mpf_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
-	ret = mpf_spi_write(spi, program_mode, sizeof(program_mode));
+	ret = mpf_spi_write(priv, program_mode, sizeof(program_mode));
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enter program mode: %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
@@ -274,11 +280,9 @@ static int mpf_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 
 static int mpf_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
-	u8 spi_frame_command[] = { MPF_SPI_FRAME };
 	struct spi_transfer xfers[2] = { 0 };
 	struct mpf_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
 	struct device *dev = &mgr->dev;
-	struct spi_device *spi;
 	int ret, i;
 
 	if (count % MPF_SPI_FRAME_SIZE) {
@@ -287,18 +291,18 @@ static int mpf_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, const char *buf, size_t count
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	spi = priv->spi;
-
-	xfers[0].tx_buf = spi_frame_command;
-	xfers[0].len = sizeof(spi_frame_command);
+	xfers[0].tx_buf = &priv->tx;
+	xfers[0].len = 1;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < count / MPF_SPI_FRAME_SIZE; i++) {
 		xfers[1].tx_buf = buf + i * MPF_SPI_FRAME_SIZE;
 		xfers[1].len = MPF_SPI_FRAME_SIZE;
 
-		ret = mpf_poll_status(spi, 0);
-		if (ret >= 0)
-			ret = spi_sync_transfer(spi, xfers, ARRAY_SIZE(xfers));
+		ret = mpf_poll_status(priv, 0);
+		if (ret >= 0) {
+			priv->tx = MPF_SPI_FRAME;
+			ret = spi_sync_transfer(priv->spi, xfers, ARRAY_SIZE(xfers));
+		}
 
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(dev, "Failed to write bitstream frame %d/%zu\n",
@@ -317,12 +321,9 @@ static int mpf_ops_write_complete(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 	const u8 release_command[] = { MPF_SPI_RELEASE };
 	struct mpf_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
 	struct device *dev = &mgr->dev;
-	struct spi_device *spi;
 	int ret;
 
-	spi = priv->spi;
-
-	ret = mpf_spi_write(spi, isc_dis_command, sizeof(isc_dis_command));
+	ret = mpf_spi_write(priv, isc_dis_command, sizeof(isc_dis_command));
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to disable ISC: %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
@@ -330,7 +331,7 @@ static int mpf_ops_write_complete(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
 
 	usleep_range(1000, 2000);
 
-	ret = mpf_spi_write(spi, release_command, sizeof(release_command));
+	ret = mpf_spi_write(priv, release_command, sizeof(release_command));
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to exit program mode: %d\n", ret);
 		return ret;
-- 
2.38.2



  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-26 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-26 14:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] Reliability improvements for Microchip MPF FPGA manager Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 14:23 ` Ivan Bornyakov [this message]
2022-12-26 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 18:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-12-26 18:58     ` Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fpga: microchip-spi: separate data frame write routine Ivan Bornyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221226142326.8111-2-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru \
    --to=i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=system@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.