All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	system@metrotek.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 20:24:06 +0200 (EET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5386279-3ce-fa0-ed5-494cb12ae6d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221226142326.8111-3-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:

> Original busy loop with retries count in mpf_poll_status() is not too
> reliable, as it takes different times on different systems. Replace it
> with read_poll_timeout() macro.
> 
> Fixes: 5f8d4a900830 ("fpga: microchip-spi: add Microchip MPF FPGA manager")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> index e72fedd93a27..f3ddfab87499 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> @@ -33,7 +34,7 @@
>  
>  #define	MPF_BITS_PER_COMPONENT_SIZE	22
>  
> -#define	MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES		10000
> +#define	MPF_STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT		(2 * USEC_PER_SEC)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_BUSY			BIT(0)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_READY		BIT(1)
>  #define	MPF_STATUS_SPI_VIOLATION	BIT(2)
> @@ -197,21 +198,17 @@ static int mpf_ops_parse_header(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
>  /* Poll HW status until busy bit is cleared and mask bits are set. */
>  static int mpf_poll_status(struct mpf_priv *priv, u8 mask)
>  {
> -	int status, retries = MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES;
> +	int ret, status;
>  
> -	while (retries--) {
> -		status = mpf_read_status(priv);
> -		if (status < 0)
> -			return status;
> -
> -		if (status & MPF_STATUS_BUSY)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (!mask || (status & mask))
> -			return status;
> -	}
> +	ret = read_poll_timeout(mpf_read_status, status,
> +				(status < 0) ||
> +				(!(status & MPF_STATUS_BUSY) &&
> +				 (!mask || (status & mask))),

I'm just noting that this code does not match function's comment 
(neither pre nor post diff code). The comment claims "mask bits are set" 
but the code tests "any mask bit set". 

However, currently it causes no issue because only MPF_STATUS_READY is 
passed and it's BIT(1).

I think the condition matching to the comment would be this (IMHO, it is 
also slightly simpler because !mask doesn't need to be special cased):

((status & (MPF_STATUS_BUSY | mask)) == mask)

(But not necessarily to be changed in this patch.)

-- 
 i.

> +				0, MPF_STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT, false, priv);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
>  
> -	return -EBUSY;
> +	return status;
>  }
>  
>  static int mpf_spi_write(struct mpf_priv *priv, const void *buf, size_t buf_size)
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-26 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-26 14:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] Reliability improvements for Microchip MPF FPGA manager Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] fpga: microchip-spi: move SPI I/O buffers out of stack Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 18:24   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2022-12-26 18:58     ` Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-26 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fpga: microchip-spi: separate data frame write routine Ivan Bornyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5386279-3ce-fa0-ed5-494cb12ae6d@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=system@metrotek.ru \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.