* [PATCH][next] ice: remove redundant continue statement in a for-loop
@ 2021-06-15 14:28 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2021-06-15 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
intel-wired-lan, netdev
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The continue statement in the for-loop is redundant. Re-work the hw_lock
check to remove it.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
index 267312fad59a..3eca0e4eab0b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
@@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ bool ice_ptp_lock(struct ice_hw *hw)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
- if (hw_lock) {
- /* Somebody is holding the lock */
- usleep_range(10000, 20000);
- continue;
- } else {
+ if (!hw_lock)
break;
- }
+
+ /* Somebody is holding the lock */
+ usleep_range(10000, 20000);
}
return !hw_lock;
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH][next] ice: remove redundant continue statement in a for-loop
@ 2021-06-15 14:28 ` Colin King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Colin King @ 2021-06-15 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
The continue statement in the for-loop is redundant. Re-work the hw_lock
check to remove it.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
index 267312fad59a..3eca0e4eab0b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
@@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ bool ice_ptp_lock(struct ice_hw *hw)
for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
- if (hw_lock) {
- /* Somebody is holding the lock */
- usleep_range(10000, 20000);
- continue;
- } else {
+ if (!hw_lock)
break;
- }
+
+ /* Somebody is holding the lock */
+ usleep_range(10000, 20000);
}
return !hw_lock;
--
2.31.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][next] ice: remove redundant continue statement in a for-loop
2021-06-15 14:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Colin King
@ 2021-06-16 23:27 ` Jacob Keller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Keller @ 2021-06-16 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Colin King, Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S . Miller,
Jakub Kicinski, intel-wired-lan, netdev
Cc: kernel-janitors, linux-kernel
On 6/15/2021 7:28 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The continue statement in the for-loop is redundant. Re-work the hw_lock
> check to remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
Yep, that logic makes more sense.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
> index 267312fad59a..3eca0e4eab0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
> @@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ bool ice_ptp_lock(struct ice_hw *hw)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
> hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
> hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
> - if (hw_lock) {
> - /* Somebody is holding the lock */
> - usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> - continue;
> - } else {
> + if (!hw_lock)
> break;
> - }
> +
> + /* Somebody is holding the lock */
> + usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> }
>
> return !hw_lock;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH][next] ice: remove redundant continue statement in a for-loop
@ 2021-06-16 23:27 ` Jacob Keller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Keller @ 2021-06-16 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan
On 6/15/2021 7:28 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The continue statement in the for-loop is redundant. Re-work the hw_lock
> check to remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
Yep, that logic makes more sense.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
> index 267312fad59a..3eca0e4eab0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
> @@ -410,13 +410,11 @@ bool ice_ptp_lock(struct ice_hw *hw)
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
> hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
> hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
> - if (hw_lock) {
> - /* Somebody is holding the lock */
> - usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> - continue;
> - } else {
> + if (!hw_lock)
> break;
> - }
> +
> + /* Somebody is holding the lock */
> + usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> }
>
> return !hw_lock;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-16 23:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-15 14:28 [PATCH][next] ice: remove redundant continue statement in a for-loop Colin King
2021-06-15 14:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Colin King
2021-06-16 23:27 ` Jacob Keller
2021-06-16 23:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jacob Keller
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.