All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fbdev: Prevent possible use-after-free in fb_release()
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 22:00:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c59cd79-76d4-7829-e1db-88bc31396c8a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51254d3d-af8d-61b3-e8a2-8fd0e583e783@suse.de>

Hello Thomas,

On 5/9/22 20:32, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Am 09.05.22 um 18:33 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> On 5/9/22 17:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Regarding drm:
>>>>> What about drm_fb_helper_fini? It calls also framebuffer_release and is
>>>>> called often from _remove paths (checked intel/radeon/nouveau). I guess
>>>>> it should be fixed as well. Do you plan to fix it?
>>>>>
>>>> I think you are correct. Maybe we need something like the following?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> index d265a73313c9..b09598f7af28 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> @@ -631,7 +631,6 @@ void drm_fb_helper_fini(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper)
>>>>           if (info) {
>>>>                   if (info->cmap.len)
>>>>                           fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
>>>> -               framebuffer_release(info);
> 
> After reviewing that code,  drm_fb_helper_fini() appears to be called 
> from .fb_destroy (see drm_fbdev_release).  The code is hard to follow 
> though.  If there another way of releasing the framebuffer here?
> 

Andrzej mentioned intel/radeon/nouveau as example, I only looked at i915
and the call chain is the following as far as I can tell:

struct pci_driver i915_pci_driver = {
...
        .remove = i915_pci_remove,
...
};


i915_driver_remove
  intel_modeset_driver_remove_noirq
    intel_fbdev_fini
      intel_fbdev_destroy
        drm_fb_helper_fini
          framebuffer_release
              
So my underdestanding is that if a program has the emulated fbdev device
opened and the i915 module is removed, then a use-after-free would be
triggered on drm_fbdev_fb_destroy() once the program closes the device:

drm_fbdev_fb_destroy
  drm_fbdev_release(info->par); <-- info was already freed on .remove

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fbdev: Prevent possible use-after-free in fb_release()
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 22:00:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c59cd79-76d4-7829-e1db-88bc31396c8a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51254d3d-af8d-61b3-e8a2-8fd0e583e783@suse.de>

Hello Thomas,

On 5/9/22 20:32, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Am 09.05.22 um 18:33 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
>> On 5/9/22 17:51, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>> Regarding drm:
>>>>> What about drm_fb_helper_fini? It calls also framebuffer_release and is
>>>>> called often from _remove paths (checked intel/radeon/nouveau). I guess
>>>>> it should be fixed as well. Do you plan to fix it?
>>>>>
>>>> I think you are correct. Maybe we need something like the following?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> index d265a73313c9..b09598f7af28 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> @@ -631,7 +631,6 @@ void drm_fb_helper_fini(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper)
>>>>           if (info) {
>>>>                   if (info->cmap.len)
>>>>                           fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
>>>> -               framebuffer_release(info);
> 
> After reviewing that code,  drm_fb_helper_fini() appears to be called 
> from .fb_destroy (see drm_fbdev_release).  The code is hard to follow 
> though.  If there another way of releasing the framebuffer here?
> 

Andrzej mentioned intel/radeon/nouveau as example, I only looked at i915
and the call chain is the following as far as I can tell:

struct pci_driver i915_pci_driver = {
...
        .remove = i915_pci_remove,
...
};


i915_driver_remove
  intel_modeset_driver_remove_noirq
    intel_fbdev_fini
      intel_fbdev_destroy
        drm_fb_helper_fini
          framebuffer_release
              
So my underdestanding is that if a program has the emulated fbdev device
opened and the i915 module is removed, then a use-after-free would be
triggered on drm_fbdev_fb_destroy() once the program closes the device:

drm_fbdev_fb_destroy
  drm_fbdev_release(info->par); <-- info was already freed on .remove

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-09 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05 21:59 [PATCH v3 0/4] fbdev: Fix use-after-free caused by wrong fb_info cleanup in drivers Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 21:59 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 22:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] fbdev: Prevent possible use-after-free in fb_release() Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 22:04   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 14:56   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-09 14:56     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-09 15:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 15:51       ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-09 15:51         ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-09 16:33         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 18:12           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-09 18:12             ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-09 20:03             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 20:03               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 22:22               ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-09 22:22                 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-09 22:42                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 22:42                   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-10  7:19                   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-10  7:19                     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-10  7:50                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-10  7:50                       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 13:18                       ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-11 13:18                         ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-10  8:04                   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  8:04                     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  8:30                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-10  8:30                       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-10  8:37                       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  8:37                         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  8:50                         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  8:50                           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  9:06                           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-10  9:06                             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-10  9:39                             ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-10  9:44                               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-09 18:32           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-09 18:32             ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-05-09 20:00             ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2022-05-09 20:00               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-11 13:15               ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-11 13:15                 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-05 22:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] fbdev: simplefb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 22:04   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 22:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] fbdev: efifb: " Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 22:05   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-06 13:07   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-06 13:07     ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-06 13:18     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-08 15:40   ` [fbdev] c6a2b1a999: BUG:KASAN:use-after-free_in_efifb_destroy kernel test robot
2022-05-08 15:40     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-08 15:40     ` kernel test robot
2022-05-05 22:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] fbdev: vesafb: Cleanup fb_info in .fb_destroy rather than .remove Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-05 22:06   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-06  7:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] fbdev: Fix use-after-free caused by wrong fb_info cleanup in drivers Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-05-06  7:34   ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c59cd79-76d4-7829-e1db-88bc31396c8a@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.