All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng.mike@gmail.com>,
	Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	Huangzhichao <huangzhichao@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: vfio_pin_map_dma cause synchronize_sched wait too long
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:06:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42c907fd-6c09-fbb6-d166-60e6827edff5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561fb205-16be-ae87-9cfe-61e6a3b04dc5@huawei.com>

On 02/12/19 10:42, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>> cond_resched in vfio_iommu_map.  Perhaps you could add one to 
>> vfio_pin_pages_remote and/or use vfio_pgsize_bitmap to cap the
>> number of pages that it returns.
> Um ... There's only one running task (qemu-kvm of the VM1) on that
> CPU, so maybe the cond_resched() is ineffective ?

Note that synchronize_sched() these days is just a synonym of
synchronize_rcu, so this makes me wonder if you're running on an older
kernel and whether you are missing this commit:


commit 92aa39e9dc77481b90cbef25e547d66cab901496
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 9 13:47:30 2018 -0700

    rcu: Make need_resched() respond to urgent RCU-QS needs

    The per-CPU rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs variable communicates an urgent
    need for an RCU quiescent state from the force-quiescent-state
processing
    within the grace-period kthread to context switches and to
cond_resched().
    Unfortunately, such urgent needs are not communicated to need_resched(),
    which is sometimes used to decide when to invoke cond_resched(), for
    but one example, within the KVM vcpu_run() function.  As of v4.15, this
    can result in synchronize_sched() being delayed by up to ten seconds,
    which can be problematic, to say nothing of annoying.

    This commit therefore checks rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs from within
    rcu_check_callbacks(), which is invoked from the scheduling-clock
    interrupt handler.  If the current task is not an idle task and is
    not executing in usermode, a context switch is forced, and either way,
    the rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs variable is set to false.  If the current
    task is an idle task, then RCU's dyntick-idle code will detect the
    quiescent state, so no further action is required.  Similarly, if the
    task is executing in usermode, other code in rcu_check_callbacks() and
    its called functions will report the corresponding quiescent state.

    Reported-by: Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@amazon.de>
    Reported-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
    Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


Thanks,

Paolo


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
	Huangzhichao <huangzhichao@huawei.com>,
	"Longpeng\(Mike\)" <longpeng.mike@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: vfio_pin_map_dma cause synchronize_sched wait too long
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 11:06:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42c907fd-6c09-fbb6-d166-60e6827edff5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <561fb205-16be-ae87-9cfe-61e6a3b04dc5@huawei.com>

On 02/12/19 10:42, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>> cond_resched in vfio_iommu_map.  Perhaps you could add one to 
>> vfio_pin_pages_remote and/or use vfio_pgsize_bitmap to cap the
>> number of pages that it returns.
> Um ... There's only one running task (qemu-kvm of the VM1) on that
> CPU, so maybe the cond_resched() is ineffective ?

Note that synchronize_sched() these days is just a synonym of
synchronize_rcu, so this makes me wonder if you're running on an older
kernel and whether you are missing this commit:


commit 92aa39e9dc77481b90cbef25e547d66cab901496
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon Jul 9 13:47:30 2018 -0700

    rcu: Make need_resched() respond to urgent RCU-QS needs

    The per-CPU rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs variable communicates an urgent
    need for an RCU quiescent state from the force-quiescent-state
processing
    within the grace-period kthread to context switches and to
cond_resched().
    Unfortunately, such urgent needs are not communicated to need_resched(),
    which is sometimes used to decide when to invoke cond_resched(), for
    but one example, within the KVM vcpu_run() function.  As of v4.15, this
    can result in synchronize_sched() being delayed by up to ten seconds,
    which can be problematic, to say nothing of annoying.

    This commit therefore checks rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs from within
    rcu_check_callbacks(), which is invoked from the scheduling-clock
    interrupt handler.  If the current task is not an idle task and is
    not executing in usermode, a context switch is forced, and either way,
    the rcu_dynticks.rcu_urgent_qs variable is set to false.  If the current
    task is an idle task, then RCU's dyntick-idle code will detect the
    quiescent state, so no further action is required.  Similarly, if the
    task is executing in usermode, other code in rcu_check_callbacks() and
    its called functions will report the corresponding quiescent state.

    Reported-by: Marius Hillenbrand <mhillenb@amazon.de>
    Reported-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
    Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


Thanks,

Paolo



  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-02 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-02  9:10 vfio_pin_map_dma cause synchronize_sched wait too long Longpeng (Mike)
2019-12-02  9:10 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2019-12-02  9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-02  9:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-02  9:42   ` Longpeng (Mike)
2019-12-02  9:42     ` Longpeng (Mike)
2019-12-02 10:06     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2019-12-02 10:06       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-12-02 10:47       ` Longpeng (Mike)
2019-12-02 10:47         ` Longpeng (Mike)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42c907fd-6c09-fbb6-d166-60e6827edff5@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=huangzhichao@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longpeng.mike@gmail.com \
    --cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.