All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Joseph Jezak <josejx@gentoo.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:21:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CCBB93.2040703@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702091829.51002.mb@bu3sch.de>

Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 23:22, Joseph Jezak wrote:
>>> Well, I don't review the rest until you say to which specs you did the changes. ;)
>> http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/B5PHY
>>
>> Larry was working from the old specs, so when I updated it, I only 
>> updated the old specs.  I'll fix the v4 specs soon.
> 
> Ah, ok. I think we should decide on which specs carry most recent information.
> I think v3 specs should be considered obsolete and new information/ fixes
> should go into v4. It is already too confusing where to find newest information
> to a certain thing.
> 

I'll agree to that as long as there is a clear indication of any differences between V3 and V4 firmware.

Larry


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Larry Finger <larry.finger-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Joseph Jezak <josejx-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	John Linville <linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:21:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45CCBB93.2040703@lwfinger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702091829.51002.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>

Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 09 February 2007 23:22, Joseph Jezak wrote:
>>> Well, I don't review the rest until you say to which specs you did the changes. ;)
>> http://bcm-specs.sipsolutions.net/B5PHY
>>
>> Larry was working from the old specs, so when I updated it, I only 
>> updated the old specs.  I'll fix the v4 specs soon.
> 
> Ah, ok. I think we should decide on which specs carry most recent information.
> I think v3 specs should be considered obsolete and new information/ fixes
> should go into v4. It is already too confusing where to find newest information
> to a certain thing.
> 

I'll agree to that as long as there is a clear indication of any differences between V3 and V4 firmware.

Larry

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-09 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-09 16:32 [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix code for spec changes of 2/7/2007 Larry Finger
2007-02-09 16:32 ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 17:11 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 17:11   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 18:11   ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 18:11     ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 22:22   ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 17:29     ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 18:21       ` Larry Finger [this message]
2007-02-09 18:21         ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 18:48         ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:05         ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:17           ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:17             ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:55             ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 20:30               ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-14 12:52               ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 19:13                 ` Larry Finger
2007-02-14 19:26                   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 19:27                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 21:52                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-14 22:28                     ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 19:26           ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 19:26             ` Larry Finger
2007-02-09 21:32             ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-09 22:52               ` Martin Langer
2007-02-09 22:52                 ` Martin Langer
2007-02-10  5:55               ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-10  5:55                 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-10 12:57                 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-10 12:57                   ` Matthew Garrett
2007-02-27 17:00                   ` Gavin McCullagh
2007-02-27 17:00                     ` Gavin McCullagh
2007-02-11  2:13                 ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-14 13:18                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 13:18                   ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-14 21:40                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 15:07                     ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 15:07                       ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 15:13                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 15:13                         ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-15 15:19                         ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 15:19                           ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-15 16:51                           ` Martin Langer
2007-02-15 16:51                             ` Martin Langer
2007-02-15 16:53                             ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-11 13:21               ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-11 13:21                 ` Johannes Berg
2007-02-09 18:45 ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 18:45   ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:17   ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:17     ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:26     ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:26       ` Michael Buesch
2007-02-09 19:58       ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 19:58         ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 22:24 ` Joseph Jezak
2007-02-09 22:24   ` Joseph Jezak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45CCBB93.2040703@lwfinger.net \
    --to=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=josejx@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.