Re: [PATCH] Add VirtIO Frame Buffer Support

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 11/03/2009 05:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 11/03/2009 10:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Exactly. In fact, I'm even scared to reboot mine because I might end 
>>> up in a 3270 terminal. The whole text only crap keeps people from 
>>> using this platform! And that's what I want to change here.
>>
>> Ok.  I oppose paravirtualization for its own sake and only support it 
>> if there's no other way to get performance.  In this case it buys us 
>> basic functionality which is surprisingly missing on native, that's 
>> arguably even more important.
>
> There is no "native" on s390.  Everything is "paravirtual".

I meant native as in "what they usually do without our stuff".

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function