From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:39:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC83994.4000208@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288189461.2709.144.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On 10/27/2010 04:24 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 à 16:00 +0200, Tejun Heo a écrit :
>
>> Heh, interesting table. What does the same code say on 64bit? Is it
>> the same?
>>
>
> Yes this is the same
Weird, then why did the percpu code interleaved cpus 16-31 between
node 0 and 1? Percpu layout code tries pretty hard to group cpus into
percpu units according to NUMA mapping but if the nodes are too
unbalanced that doing so would result in too big waste of address
space, it gives up. I _think_ that's what happened with the weird
24:8 NUMA split on 32bit. So, the interesting part is cpus 16-31 not
0-15.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-27 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22 ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:45 ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49 ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 5:43 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 6:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-10-27 14:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33 ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40 ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 6:43 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19 ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04 ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 6:46 ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 6:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 13:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 8:54 ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50 ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC83994.4000208@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.