All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor prep_irq_for_user_exit()
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:37:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f21c7c2-d04b-dcb6-09ad-562a2c3cf88f@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1623378421.ayihg84s3a.astroid@bobo.none>



Le 11/06/2021 à 04:30, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of June 5, 2021 12:56 am:
>> prep_irq_for_user_exit() is a superset of
>> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit().
>>
>> Refactor it.
> 
> I like the refactoring, but now prep_irq_for_user_exit() is calling
> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit(), which seems like the wrong naming.
> 
> You could re-name prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit() to
> prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() maybe? Or it could be
> __prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() then prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit()
> and prep_irq_for_user_exit() would both call it.

I renamed it prep_irq_for_enabled_exit().

And I realised that after patch 4, prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() has become a trivial function used 
only once.

So I swapped patches 1/2 with patches 3/4 and added a 5th one to squash prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() 
into its caller.

You didn't have any comment on patch 4 (that is now patch 2) ?

Thanks for the review
Christophe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor prep_irq_for_user_exit()
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:37:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f21c7c2-d04b-dcb6-09ad-562a2c3cf88f@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1623378421.ayihg84s3a.astroid@bobo.none>



Le 11/06/2021 à 04:30, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of June 5, 2021 12:56 am:
>> prep_irq_for_user_exit() is a superset of
>> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit().
>>
>> Refactor it.
> 
> I like the refactoring, but now prep_irq_for_user_exit() is calling
> prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit(), which seems like the wrong naming.
> 
> You could re-name prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit() to
> prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() maybe? Or it could be
> __prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() then prep_irq_for_kernel_enabled_exit()
> and prep_irq_for_user_exit() would both call it.

I renamed it prep_irq_for_enabled_exit().

And I realised that after patch 4, prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() has become a trivial function used 
only once.

So I swapped patches 1/2 with patches 3/4 and added a 5th one to squash prep_irq_for_enabled_exit() 
into its caller.

You didn't have any comment on patch 4 (that is now patch 2) ?

Thanks for the review
Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-04 14:56 [PATCH v2 1/4] powerpc/interrupt: Interchange prep_irq_for_{kernel_enabled/user}_exit() Christophe Leroy
2021-06-04 14:56 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-04 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor prep_irq_for_user_exit() Christophe Leroy
2021-06-04 14:56   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11  2:30   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-11  2:30     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-15  8:37     ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-06-15  8:37       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-17  3:33       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-17  3:33         ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-04 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/interrupt: Rename and lightly change syscall_exit_prepare_main() Christophe Leroy
2021-06-04 14:56   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11  2:32   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-11  2:32     ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-04 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/interrupt: Refactor interrupt_exit_user_prepare() Christophe Leroy
2021-06-04 14:56   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-06-11  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] powerpc/interrupt: Interchange prep_irq_for_{kernel_enabled/user}_exit() Nicholas Piggin
2021-06-11  2:26   ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f21c7c2-d04b-dcb6-09ad-562a2c3cf88f@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.