From: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: sizeof (struct tYpO *) : it is just a typo or rather a bug ? Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 20:20:16 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <53D14E60.1010105@gmx.de> (raw) Inspired by this "typo" fix http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1754640 I grep'ed the current git tree of linus for similar issues. For these 4 places I'm wondering where the appropriate struct definition is located : arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c: sizeof(struct pci_devdev_info *)) { tools/perf/builtin-sched.c: sched->tasks = realloc(sched->tasks, sched->nr_tasks * sizeof(struct task_task *)); fs/ceph/xattr.c: xattrs = kcalloc(numattr, sizeof(struct ceph_xattr *), fs/ceph/xattr.c: memset(xattrs, 0, numattr*sizeof(struct ceph_xattr *)); Nevertheless I was told, that gcc doesn't complain about such things due to eventually evaluating it to "sizeof(null)". I'm however curious if at least a warning should be emitted in such a case, or? -- Toralf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: sizeof (struct tYpO *) : it is just a typo or rather a bug ? Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 18:20:16 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <53D14E60.1010105@gmx.de> (raw) Inspired by this "typo" fix http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1754640 I grep'ed the current git tree of linus for similar issues. For these 4 places I'm wondering where the appropriate struct definition is located : arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_acpi_init.c: sizeof(struct pci_devdev_info *)) { tools/perf/builtin-sched.c: sched->tasks = realloc(sched->tasks, sched->nr_tasks * sizeof(struct task_task *)); fs/ceph/xattr.c: xattrs = kcalloc(numattr, sizeof(struct ceph_xattr *), fs/ceph/xattr.c: memset(xattrs, 0, numattr*sizeof(struct ceph_xattr *)); Nevertheless I was told, that gcc doesn't complain about such things due to eventually evaluating it to "sizeof(null)". I'm however curious if at least a warning should be emitted in such a case, or? -- Toralf
next reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 18:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-07-24 18:20 Toralf Förster [this message] 2014-07-24 18:20 ` sizeof (struct tYpO *) : it is just a typo or rather a bug ? Toralf Förster 2014-07-24 18:33 ` Ilya Dryomov 2014-07-24 18:33 ` Ilya Dryomov 2014-07-24 18:33 ` Ilya Dryomov 2014-07-24 18:37 ` Toralf Förster 2014-07-24 18:37 ` Toralf Förster 2014-07-24 18:37 ` Toralf Förster 2014-07-25 11:20 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh 2014-07-25 11:20 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh 2014-07-25 11:20 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh 2014-07-28 17:21 ` [Cocci] Fwd: " Toralf Förster 2014-07-28 20:13 ` Julia Lawall 2014-07-28 20:41 ` Toralf Förster 2014-07-28 20:50 ` Julia Lawall 2014-07-28 21:20 ` Toralf Förster 2014-07-29 5:49 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=53D14E60.1010105@gmx.de \ --to=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \ --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.