All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>, <kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7256f88d-809e-4aba-3c46-a223bd8cc521@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316193216.920734-4-hch@lst.de>


On 3/16/20 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove the code to fault device private pages back into system memory
> that has never been used by any driver.  Also replace the usage of the
> HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE flag in the pfns array with a simple
> is_device_private_page check in nouveau.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can
look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a page from
another device's private memory? Should it call handle_mm_fault()?


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c |  1 -
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c  |  5 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c   |  1 -
>   include/linux/hmm.h                     |  2 --
>   mm/hmm.c                                | 25 +++++--------------------
>   5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index dee446278417..90821ce5e6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,6 @@ struct amdgpu_ttm_tt {
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	(1 << 0), /* HMM_PFN_VALID */
>   	(1 << 1), /* HMM_PFN_WRITE */
> -	0 /* HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE */
>   };
>   
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_values[HMM_PFN_VALUE_MAX] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0e36345d395c..edfd0805fba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>   
>   #include <nvif/class.h>
>   #include <nvif/object.h>
> +#include <nvif/if000c.h>
>   #include <nvif/if500b.h>
>   #include <nvif/if900b.h>
>   
> @@ -692,9 +693,8 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		if (page == NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!(range->pfns[i] & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> +		if (!is_device_private_page(page))
>   			continue;
> -		}
>   
>   		if (!nouveau_dmem_page(drm, page)) {
>   			WARN(1, "Some unknown device memory !\n");
> @@ -705,5 +705,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		addr = nouveau_dmem_page_addr(page);
>   		range->pfns[i] &= ((1UL << range->pfn_shift) - 1);
>   		range->pfns[i] |= (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) << range->pfn_shift;
> +		range->pfns[i] |= NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM;
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index df9bf1fd1bc0..39c731a99937 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static const u64
>   nouveau_svm_pfn_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	[HMM_PFN_VALID         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_V,
>   	[HMM_PFN_WRITE         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_W,
> -	[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM,
>   };
>   
>   static const u64
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 4bf8d6997b12..5e6034f105c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
>    * Flags:
>    * HMM_PFN_VALID: pfn is valid. It has, at least, read permission.
>    * HMM_PFN_WRITE: CPU page table has write permission set
> - * HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE: private device memory (ZONE_DEVICE)
>    *
>    * The driver provides a flags array for mapping page protections to device
>    * PTE bits. If the driver valid bit for an entry is bit 3,
> @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@
>   enum hmm_pfn_flag_e {
>   	HMM_PFN_VALID = 0,
>   	HMM_PFN_WRITE,
> -	HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
>   	HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 180e398170b0..cfad65f6a67b 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -118,15 +118,6 @@ static inline void hmm_pte_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
>   	/* We aren't ask to do anything ... */
>   	if (!(pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]))
>   		return;
> -	/* If this is device memory then only fault if explicitly requested */
> -	if ((cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> -		/* Do we fault on device memory ? */
> -		if (pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE]) {
> -			*write_fault = pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
> -			*fault = true;
> -		}
> -		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* If CPU page table is not valid then we need to fault */
>   	*fault = !(cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]);
> @@ -260,21 +251,15 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
>   		swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * This is a special swap entry, ignore migration, use
> -		 * device and report anything else as error.
> +		 * Never fault in device private pages pages, but just report
> +		 * the PFN even if not present.
>   		 */
>   		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> -			cpu_flags = range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] |
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE];
> -			cpu_flags |= is_write_device_private_entry(entry) ?
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] : 0;
> -			hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, orig_pfn, cpu_flags,
> -					   &fault, &write_fault);
> -			if (fault || write_fault)
> -				goto fault;
>   			*pfn = hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range,
>   					    swp_offset(entry));
> -			*pfn |= cpu_flags;
> +			*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
> +			if (is_write_device_private_entry(entry))
> +				*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
>   			return 0;
>   		}
>   
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org>,
	"Dan Williams"
	<dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata-tEXmvtCZX7AybS5Ee8rs3A@public.gmane.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-ppc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7256f88d-809e-4aba-3c46-a223bd8cc521@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316193216.920734-4-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>


On 3/16/20 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove the code to fault device private pages back into system memory
> that has never been used by any driver.  Also replace the usage of the
> HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE flag in the pfns array with a simple
> is_device_private_page check in nouveau.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>

Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can
look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a page from
another device's private memory? Should it call handle_mm_fault()?


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c |  1 -
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c  |  5 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c   |  1 -
>   include/linux/hmm.h                     |  2 --
>   mm/hmm.c                                | 25 +++++--------------------
>   5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index dee446278417..90821ce5e6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,6 @@ struct amdgpu_ttm_tt {
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	(1 << 0), /* HMM_PFN_VALID */
>   	(1 << 1), /* HMM_PFN_WRITE */
> -	0 /* HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE */
>   };
>   
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_values[HMM_PFN_VALUE_MAX] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0e36345d395c..edfd0805fba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>   
>   #include <nvif/class.h>
>   #include <nvif/object.h>
> +#include <nvif/if000c.h>
>   #include <nvif/if500b.h>
>   #include <nvif/if900b.h>
>   
> @@ -692,9 +693,8 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		if (page == NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!(range->pfns[i] & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> +		if (!is_device_private_page(page))
>   			continue;
> -		}
>   
>   		if (!nouveau_dmem_page(drm, page)) {
>   			WARN(1, "Some unknown device memory !\n");
> @@ -705,5 +705,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		addr = nouveau_dmem_page_addr(page);
>   		range->pfns[i] &= ((1UL << range->pfn_shift) - 1);
>   		range->pfns[i] |= (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) << range->pfn_shift;
> +		range->pfns[i] |= NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM;
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index df9bf1fd1bc0..39c731a99937 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static const u64
>   nouveau_svm_pfn_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	[HMM_PFN_VALID         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_V,
>   	[HMM_PFN_WRITE         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_W,
> -	[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM,
>   };
>   
>   static const u64
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 4bf8d6997b12..5e6034f105c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
>    * Flags:
>    * HMM_PFN_VALID: pfn is valid. It has, at least, read permission.
>    * HMM_PFN_WRITE: CPU page table has write permission set
> - * HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE: private device memory (ZONE_DEVICE)
>    *
>    * The driver provides a flags array for mapping page protections to device
>    * PTE bits. If the driver valid bit for an entry is bit 3,
> @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@
>   enum hmm_pfn_flag_e {
>   	HMM_PFN_VALID = 0,
>   	HMM_PFN_WRITE,
> -	HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
>   	HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 180e398170b0..cfad65f6a67b 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -118,15 +118,6 @@ static inline void hmm_pte_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
>   	/* We aren't ask to do anything ... */
>   	if (!(pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]))
>   		return;
> -	/* If this is device memory then only fault if explicitly requested */
> -	if ((cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> -		/* Do we fault on device memory ? */
> -		if (pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE]) {
> -			*write_fault = pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
> -			*fault = true;
> -		}
> -		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* If CPU page table is not valid then we need to fault */
>   	*fault = !(cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]);
> @@ -260,21 +251,15 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
>   		swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * This is a special swap entry, ignore migration, use
> -		 * device and report anything else as error.
> +		 * Never fault in device private pages pages, but just report
> +		 * the PFN even if not present.
>   		 */
>   		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> -			cpu_flags = range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] |
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE];
> -			cpu_flags |= is_write_device_private_entry(entry) ?
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] : 0;
> -			hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, orig_pfn, cpu_flags,
> -					   &fault, &write_fault);
> -			if (fault || write_fault)
> -				goto fault;
>   			*pfn = hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range,
>   					    swp_offset(entry));
> -			*pfn |= cpu_flags;
> +			*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
> +			if (is_write_device_private_entry(entry))
> +				*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
>   			return 0;
>   		}
>   
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7256f88d-809e-4aba-3c46-a223bd8cc521@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316193216.920734-4-hch@lst.de>


On 3/16/20 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove the code to fault device private pages back into system memory
> that has never been used by any driver.  Also replace the usage of the
> HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE flag in the pfns array with a simple
> is_device_private_page check in nouveau.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can
look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a page from
another device's private memory? Should it call handle_mm_fault()?


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c |  1 -
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c  |  5 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c   |  1 -
>   include/linux/hmm.h                     |  2 --
>   mm/hmm.c                                | 25 +++++--------------------
>   5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index dee446278417..90821ce5e6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,6 @@ struct amdgpu_ttm_tt {
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	(1 << 0), /* HMM_PFN_VALID */
>   	(1 << 1), /* HMM_PFN_WRITE */
> -	0 /* HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE */
>   };
>   
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_values[HMM_PFN_VALUE_MAX] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0e36345d395c..edfd0805fba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>   
>   #include <nvif/class.h>
>   #include <nvif/object.h>
> +#include <nvif/if000c.h>
>   #include <nvif/if500b.h>
>   #include <nvif/if900b.h>
>   
> @@ -692,9 +693,8 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		if (page == NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!(range->pfns[i] & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> +		if (!is_device_private_page(page))
>   			continue;
> -		}
>   
>   		if (!nouveau_dmem_page(drm, page)) {
>   			WARN(1, "Some unknown device memory !\n");
> @@ -705,5 +705,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		addr = nouveau_dmem_page_addr(page);
>   		range->pfns[i] &= ((1UL << range->pfn_shift) - 1);
>   		range->pfns[i] |= (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) << range->pfn_shift;
> +		range->pfns[i] |= NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM;
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index df9bf1fd1bc0..39c731a99937 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static const u64
>   nouveau_svm_pfn_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	[HMM_PFN_VALID         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_V,
>   	[HMM_PFN_WRITE         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_W,
> -	[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM,
>   };
>   
>   static const u64
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 4bf8d6997b12..5e6034f105c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
>    * Flags:
>    * HMM_PFN_VALID: pfn is valid. It has, at least, read permission.
>    * HMM_PFN_WRITE: CPU page table has write permission set
> - * HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE: private device memory (ZONE_DEVICE)
>    *
>    * The driver provides a flags array for mapping page protections to device
>    * PTE bits. If the driver valid bit for an entry is bit 3,
> @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@
>   enum hmm_pfn_flag_e {
>   	HMM_PFN_VALID = 0,
>   	HMM_PFN_WRITE,
> -	HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
>   	HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 180e398170b0..cfad65f6a67b 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -118,15 +118,6 @@ static inline void hmm_pte_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
>   	/* We aren't ask to do anything ... */
>   	if (!(pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]))
>   		return;
> -	/* If this is device memory then only fault if explicitly requested */
> -	if ((cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> -		/* Do we fault on device memory ? */
> -		if (pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE]) {
> -			*write_fault = pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
> -			*fault = true;
> -		}
> -		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* If CPU page table is not valid then we need to fault */
>   	*fault = !(cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]);
> @@ -260,21 +251,15 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
>   		swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * This is a special swap entry, ignore migration, use
> -		 * device and report anything else as error.
> +		 * Never fault in device private pages pages, but just report
> +		 * the PFN even if not present.
>   		 */
>   		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> -			cpu_flags = range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] |
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE];
> -			cpu_flags |= is_write_device_private_entry(entry) ?
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] : 0;
> -			hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, orig_pfn, cpu_flags,
> -					   &fault, &write_fault);
> -			if (fault || write_fault)
> -				goto fault;
>   			*pfn = hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range,
>   					    swp_offset(entry));
> -			*pfn |= cpu_flags;
> +			*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
> +			if (is_write_device_private_entry(entry))
> +				*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
>   			return 0;
>   		}
>   
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7256f88d-809e-4aba-3c46-a223bd8cc521@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316193216.920734-4-hch@lst.de>


On 3/16/20 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove the code to fault device private pages back into system memory
> that has never been used by any driver.  Also replace the usage of the
> HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE flag in the pfns array with a simple
> is_device_private_page check in nouveau.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can
look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a page from
another device's private memory? Should it call handle_mm_fault()?


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c |  1 -
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c  |  5 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c   |  1 -
>   include/linux/hmm.h                     |  2 --
>   mm/hmm.c                                | 25 +++++--------------------
>   5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index dee446278417..90821ce5e6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,6 @@ struct amdgpu_ttm_tt {
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	(1 << 0), /* HMM_PFN_VALID */
>   	(1 << 1), /* HMM_PFN_WRITE */
> -	0 /* HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE */
>   };
>   
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_values[HMM_PFN_VALUE_MAX] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0e36345d395c..edfd0805fba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>   
>   #include <nvif/class.h>
>   #include <nvif/object.h>
> +#include <nvif/if000c.h>
>   #include <nvif/if500b.h>
>   #include <nvif/if900b.h>
>   
> @@ -692,9 +693,8 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		if (page == NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!(range->pfns[i] & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> +		if (!is_device_private_page(page))
>   			continue;
> -		}
>   
>   		if (!nouveau_dmem_page(drm, page)) {
>   			WARN(1, "Some unknown device memory !\n");
> @@ -705,5 +705,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		addr = nouveau_dmem_page_addr(page);
>   		range->pfns[i] &= ((1UL << range->pfn_shift) - 1);
>   		range->pfns[i] |= (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) << range->pfn_shift;
> +		range->pfns[i] |= NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM;
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index df9bf1fd1bc0..39c731a99937 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static const u64
>   nouveau_svm_pfn_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	[HMM_PFN_VALID         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_V,
>   	[HMM_PFN_WRITE         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_W,
> -	[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM,
>   };
>   
>   static const u64
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 4bf8d6997b12..5e6034f105c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
>    * Flags:
>    * HMM_PFN_VALID: pfn is valid. It has, at least, read permission.
>    * HMM_PFN_WRITE: CPU page table has write permission set
> - * HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE: private device memory (ZONE_DEVICE)
>    *
>    * The driver provides a flags array for mapping page protections to device
>    * PTE bits. If the driver valid bit for an entry is bit 3,
> @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@
>   enum hmm_pfn_flag_e {
>   	HMM_PFN_VALID = 0,
>   	HMM_PFN_WRITE,
> -	HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
>   	HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 180e398170b0..cfad65f6a67b 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -118,15 +118,6 @@ static inline void hmm_pte_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
>   	/* We aren't ask to do anything ... */
>   	if (!(pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]))
>   		return;
> -	/* If this is device memory then only fault if explicitly requested */
> -	if ((cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> -		/* Do we fault on device memory ? */
> -		if (pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE]) {
> -			*write_fault = pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
> -			*fault = true;
> -		}
> -		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* If CPU page table is not valid then we need to fault */
>   	*fault = !(cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]);
> @@ -260,21 +251,15 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
>   		swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * This is a special swap entry, ignore migration, use
> -		 * device and report anything else as error.
> +		 * Never fault in device private pages pages, but just report
> +		 * the PFN even if not present.
>   		 */
>   		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> -			cpu_flags = range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] |
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE];
> -			cpu_flags |= is_write_device_private_entry(entry) ?
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] : 0;
> -			hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, orig_pfn, cpu_flags,
> -					   &fault, &write_fault);
> -			if (fault || write_fault)
> -				goto fault;
>   			*pfn = hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range,
>   					    swp_offset(entry));
> -			*pfn |= cpu_flags;
> +			*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
> +			if (is_write_device_private_entry(entry))
> +				*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
>   			return 0;
>   		}
>   
> 
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Bharata B Rao" <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 22:49:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7256f88d-809e-4aba-3c46-a223bd8cc521@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200316193216.920734-4-hch@lst.de>


On 3/16/20 12:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove the code to fault device private pages back into system memory
> that has never been used by any driver.  Also replace the usage of the
> HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE flag in the pfns array with a simple
> is_device_private_page check in nouveau.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can
look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a page from
another device's private memory? Should it call handle_mm_fault()?


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c |  1 -
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c  |  5 +++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c   |  1 -
>   include/linux/hmm.h                     |  2 --
>   mm/hmm.c                                | 25 +++++--------------------
>   5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> index dee446278417..90821ce5e6ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
> @@ -776,7 +776,6 @@ struct amdgpu_ttm_tt {
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	(1 << 0), /* HMM_PFN_VALID */
>   	(1 << 1), /* HMM_PFN_WRITE */
> -	0 /* HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE */
>   };
>   
>   static const uint64_t hmm_range_values[HMM_PFN_VALUE_MAX] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> index 0e36345d395c..edfd0805fba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>   
>   #include <nvif/class.h>
>   #include <nvif/object.h>
> +#include <nvif/if000c.h>
>   #include <nvif/if500b.h>
>   #include <nvif/if900b.h>
>   
> @@ -692,9 +693,8 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		if (page = NULL)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (!(range->pfns[i] & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> +		if (!is_device_private_page(page))
>   			continue;
> -		}
>   
>   		if (!nouveau_dmem_page(drm, page)) {
>   			WARN(1, "Some unknown device memory !\n");
> @@ -705,5 +705,6 @@ nouveau_dmem_convert_pfn(struct nouveau_drm *drm,
>   		addr = nouveau_dmem_page_addr(page);
>   		range->pfns[i] &= ((1UL << range->pfn_shift) - 1);
>   		range->pfns[i] |= (addr >> PAGE_SHIFT) << range->pfn_shift;
> +		range->pfns[i] |= NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM;
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> index df9bf1fd1bc0..39c731a99937 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static const u64
>   nouveau_svm_pfn_flags[HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX] = {
>   	[HMM_PFN_VALID         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_V,
>   	[HMM_PFN_WRITE         ] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_W,
> -	[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE] = NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_VRAM,
>   };
>   
>   static const u64
> diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
> index 4bf8d6997b12..5e6034f105c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hmm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
>    * Flags:
>    * HMM_PFN_VALID: pfn is valid. It has, at least, read permission.
>    * HMM_PFN_WRITE: CPU page table has write permission set
> - * HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE: private device memory (ZONE_DEVICE)
>    *
>    * The driver provides a flags array for mapping page protections to device
>    * PTE bits. If the driver valid bit for an entry is bit 3,
> @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@
>   enum hmm_pfn_flag_e {
>   	HMM_PFN_VALID = 0,
>   	HMM_PFN_WRITE,
> -	HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE,
>   	HMM_PFN_FLAG_MAX
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 180e398170b0..cfad65f6a67b 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -118,15 +118,6 @@ static inline void hmm_pte_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
>   	/* We aren't ask to do anything ... */
>   	if (!(pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]))
>   		return;
> -	/* If this is device memory then only fault if explicitly requested */
> -	if ((cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE])) {
> -		/* Do we fault on device memory ? */
> -		if (pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE]) {
> -			*write_fault = pfns & range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
> -			*fault = true;
> -		}
> -		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	/* If CPU page table is not valid then we need to fault */
>   	*fault = !(cpu_flags & range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID]);
> @@ -260,21 +251,15 @@ static int hmm_vma_handle_pte(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
>   		swp_entry_t entry = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * This is a special swap entry, ignore migration, use
> -		 * device and report anything else as error.
> +		 * Never fault in device private pages pages, but just report
> +		 * the PFN even if not present.
>   		 */
>   		if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> -			cpu_flags = range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] |
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE];
> -			cpu_flags |= is_write_device_private_entry(entry) ?
> -				range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] : 0;
> -			hmm_pte_need_fault(hmm_vma_walk, orig_pfn, cpu_flags,
> -					   &fault, &write_fault);
> -			if (fault || write_fault)
> -				goto fault;
>   			*pfn = hmm_device_entry_from_pfn(range,
>   					    swp_offset(entry));
> -			*pfn |= cpu_flags;
> +			*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_VALID];
> +			if (is_write_device_private_entry(entry))
> +				*pfn |= range->flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE];
>   			return 0;
>   		}
>   
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-16 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 196+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-16 19:32 ensure device private pages have an owner v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] memremap: add an owner field to struct dev_pagemap Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 20:55   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:55     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:55     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:55     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:55     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: handle multiple owners of device private pages in migrate_vma Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 21:43   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 21:43     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 21:43     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 21:43     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 21:43     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: simplify device private page handling in hmm_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:59     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 21:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 21:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 21:33       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 22:49   ` Ralph Campbell [this message]
2020-03-16 22:49     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 22:49     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 22:49     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 22:49     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17  7:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17  7:34       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17  7:34       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 22:43       ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 22:43         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 22:43         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 22:43         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-18  9:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-18  9:34           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-18  9:34           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:24       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:28         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:28           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:47           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:47             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:47             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:47             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 12:59             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:59               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 12:59               ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17 17:32               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 17:32                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 17:32                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 17:32                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 17:32                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 23:14               ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 23:14                 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 23:14                 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 23:14                 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-19 18:17                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:17                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:17                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:17                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 22:56                   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-19 22:56                     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-19 22:56                     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-19 22:56                     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20  0:03                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  0:03                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  0:03                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  0:03                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21  8:20                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21  8:20                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21  8:20                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-20  0:14                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  0:14                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  0:14                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  0:14                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20  1:33                   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20  1:33                     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20  1:33                     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20  1:33                     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20 12:58                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 12:58                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 12:58                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 12:58                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 12:58                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: check the device private page owner " Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 23:11   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 23:11     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 23:11     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 23:11     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 23:11     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-20 13:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 13:41     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 13:41     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-20 13:41     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21  8:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21  8:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21  8:22       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21 12:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21 12:38         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21 12:38         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21 12:38         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-21 15:18         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21 15:18           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-21 15:18           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-17  5:31 ` ensure device private pages have an owner v2 Bharata B Rao
2020-03-17  5:43   ` Bharata B Rao
2020-03-17  5:31   ` Bharata B Rao
2020-03-19  0:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19  7:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19  7:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19  7:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-19 11:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 11:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 11:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 11:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-19 18:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-16 17:52 ensure device private pages have an owner Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: handle multiple owners of device private pages in migrate_vma Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 18:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 18:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 18:17     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 18:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: remove device private page support from hmm_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 17:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:42   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 18:42     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 18:42     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 18:42     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 18:42     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 18:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:49       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:49       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 18:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:56       ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:56         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:56         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:56         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:09       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 20:09         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 20:09         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 20:09         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 20:24         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:24           ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:24           ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 20:24           ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 11:56           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 11:56             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 11:56             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 11:56             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-17 22:46             ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 22:46               ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 22:46               ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-17 22:46               ` Ralph Campbell
2020-03-16 19:04     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:04       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:04       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:04       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-16 19:07       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-16 19:07         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7256f88d-809e-4aba-3c46-a223bd8cc521@nvidia.com \
    --to=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.