All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:



______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:


_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@acpica.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel@Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:22:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e8c1926-4209-8f10-d0f9-72c875a85a88@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 08:33 -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 11/21/20 9:10 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 08:50 -0800, trix at redhat.com wrote:
> > > A difficult part of automating commits is composing the subsystem
> > > preamble in the commit log.  For the ongoing effort of a fixer producing
> > > one or two fixes a release the use of 'treewide:' does not seem appropriate.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if the normal prefix was used.  Unfortunately normal is
> > > not consistent across the tree.
> > > 
> > > So I am looking for comments for adding a new tag to the MAINTAINERS file
> > > 
> > > 	D: Commit subsystem prefix
> > > 
> > > ex/ for FPGA DFL DRIVERS
> > > 
> > > 	D: fpga: dfl:
> > I'm all for it.  Good luck with the effort.  It's not completely trivial.
> > 
> > From a decade ago:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1289919077.28741.50.camel at Joe-Laptop/
> > 
> > (and that thread started with extra semicolon patches too)
> 
> Reading the history, how about this.
> 
> get_maintainer.pl outputs a single prefix, if multiple files have the
> same prefix it works, if they don't its an error.
> 
> Another script 'commit_one_file.sh' does the call to get_mainainter.pl
> to get the prefix and be called by run-clang-tools.py to get the fixer
> specific message.

It's not whether the script used is get_maintainer or any other script,
the question is really if the MAINTAINERS file is the appropriate place
to store per-subsystem patch specific prefixes.

It is.

Then the question should be how are the forms described and what is the
inheritance priority.  My preference would be to have a default of
inherit the parent base and add basename(subsystem dirname).

Commit history seems to have standardized on using colons as the separator
between the commit prefix and the subject.

A good mechanism to explore how various subsystems have uses prefixes in
the past might be something like:

$ git log --no-merges --pretty='%s' -<commit_count> <subsystem_path> | \
  perl -n -e 'print substr($_, 0, rindex($_, ":") + 1) . "\n";' | \
  sort | uniq -c | sort -rn

Using 10000 for commit_count and drivers/scsi for subsystem_path, the
top 40 entries are below:

About 1% don't have a colon, and there is no real consistency even
within individual drivers below scsi.  For instance, qla2xxx:

     1	    814 scsi: qla2xxx:
     2	    691 scsi: lpfc:
     3	    389 scsi: hisi_sas:
     4	    354 scsi: ufs:
     5	    339 scsi:
     6	    291 qla2xxx:
     7	    256 scsi: megaraid_sas:
     8	    249 scsi: mpt3sas:
     9	    200 hpsa:
    10	    190 scsi: aacraid:
    11	    174 lpfc:
    12	    153 scsi: qedf:
    13	    144 scsi: smartpqi:
    14	    139 scsi: cxlflash:
    15	    122 scsi: core:
    16	    110 [SCSI] qla2xxx:
    17	    108 ncr5380:
    18	     98 scsi: hpsa:
    19	     97 
    20	     89 treewide:
    21	     88 mpt3sas:
    22	     86 scsi: libfc:
    23	     85 scsi: qedi:
    24	     84 scsi: be2iscsi:
    25	     81 [SCSI] qla4xxx:
    26	     81 hisi_sas:
    27	     81 block:
    28	     75 megaraid_sas:
    29	     71 scsi: sd:
    30	     69 [SCSI] hpsa:
    31	     68 cxlflash:
    32	     65 scsi: libsas:
    33	     65 scsi: fnic:
    34	     61 scsi: scsi_debug:
    35	     60 scsi: arcmsr:
    36	     57 be2iscsi:
    37	     53 atp870u:
    38	     51 scsi: bfa:
    39	     50 scsi: storvsc:
    40	     48 sd:




  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-22 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 146+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-21 16:50 [RFC] MAINTAINERS tag for cleanup robot trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` [Cluster-devel] " trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` trix
2020-11-21 16:50 ` trix
2020-11-21 17:10 ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` [Cluster-devel] " Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 17:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 16:33   ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` [Cluster-devel] " Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:33     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 18:22     ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-11-22 18:22       ` [Cluster-devel] " Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:22       ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23 17:06       ` Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` [Cluster-devel] " Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-23 17:06         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-21 17:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-11-21 17:18 ` [RFC] " James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` [Cluster-devel] " James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-21 17:18   ` James Bottomley
2020-11-21 18:02   ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` [Cluster-devel] " Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-21 18:02     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  5:20     ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23 15:52   ` Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 15:52     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 15:52     ` Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 15:52     ` Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 15:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 15:52     ` Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 15:52     ` Jani Nikula
2020-11-23 16:17     ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` [Cluster-devel] " Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` [Intel-gfx] " Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-23 16:17       ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-21 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-11-21 17:57 ` [RFC] " bluez.test.bot
2020-11-21 18:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
2020-11-22  3:23 ` [RFC] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22  3:23   ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22  3:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22  3:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22  3:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22  3:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22  3:23   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:46   ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` [Cluster-devel] " Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:46     ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 14:56     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:56       ` [Cluster-devel] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:56       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:56       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:56       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 14:56       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-11-22 16:10       ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` [Cluster-devel] " Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` [Intel-gfx] " Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:10         ` Tom Rix
2020-11-22 16:49         ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` [Cluster-devel] " James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` [Intel-gfx] " James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 16:49           ` James Bottomley
2020-11-22 18:23           ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` [Cluster-devel] " Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 18:23             ` Joe Perches
2020-11-22 22:33             ` Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` [Cluster-devel] " Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` [Intel-gfx] " Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` Finn Thain
2020-11-22 22:33               ` Finn Thain
2020-11-23  0:53               ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` [Cluster-devel] " Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` Joe Perches
2020-11-23  0:53                 ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=859bae8ddae3238116824192f6ddf1c91a381913.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.