All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] block: use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:30:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8716105a867b898e4785339de5bef1ab1d1f019c.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509075408.16388-6-hch@lst.de>

T24gV2VkLCAyMDE4LTA1LTA5IGF0IDA5OjU0ICswMjAwLCBDaHJpc3RvcGggSGVsbHdpZyB3cm90
ZToNCj4gV2UganVzdCBjYW4ndCBkbyBJL08gd2hlbiBkb2luZyBibG9jayBsYXllciByZXF1ZXN0
cyBhbGxvY2F0aW9ucywNCj4gc28gdXNlIEdGUF9OT0lPIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgdGhlIGV2ZW4gbW9y
ZSBsaW1pdGVkIF9fR0ZQX0RJUkVDVF9SRUNMQUlNLg0KDQpSZXZpZXdlZC1ieTogQmFydCBWYW4g
QXNzY2hlIDxiYXJ0LnZhbmFzc2NoZUB3ZGMuY29tPg0KDQoNCg==

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] block: use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:30:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8716105a867b898e4785339de5bef1ab1d1f019c.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509075408.16388-6-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 09:54 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We just can't do I/O when doing block layer requests allocations,
> so use GFP_NOIO instead of the even more limited __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-14 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-09  7:54 fix confusion around GFP_* flags and blk_get_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-09  7:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] scsi/osd: remove the gfp argument to osd_start_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:14   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 15:14     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09  7:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: fix __get_request documentation Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:22   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 15:22     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09  7:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: sanitize blk_get_request calling conventions Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:26   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 15:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09  7:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: pass an explicit gfp_t to get_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:28   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 15:28     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09  7:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:30   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-05-14 15:30     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-09  7:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: consistently use GFP_NOIO instead of __GFP_NORECLAIM Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 15:35   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 15:35     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-14 14:38 ` fix confusion around GFP_* flags and blk_get_request Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-14 14:54   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8716105a867b898e4785339de5bef1ab1d1f019c.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.