From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>,
Beraldo Leal <bleal@redhat.com>,
Daniel Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] python: add qmp-send program to send raw qmp commands to qemu
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 07:18:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tub623in.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFn=p-Y=sTkeMDiht-TCrQKq8WOvbayXjSKiitJkVqUGL6MQNw@mail.gmail.com> (John Snow's message of "Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:08:11 -0400")
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 5:03 AM Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
> wrote:
[...]
>> If it stays in QEMU tree, what licensing should I use ? LGPL does not
>> hurt, no ?
>>
>
> Whichever you please. GPLv2+ would be convenient and harmonizes well with
> other tools. LGPL is only something I started doing so that the "qemu.qmp"
> package would be LGPL. Licensing the tools as LGPL was just a sin of
> convenience so I could claim a single license for the whole wheel/egg/tgz.
>
> (I didn't want to make separate qmp and qmp-tools packages.)
>
> Go with what you feel is best.
Any license other than GPLv2+ needs justification in the commit message.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-16 9:54 [RFC PATCH] python: add qmp-send program to send raw qmp commands to qemu Damien Hedde
2022-03-16 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-03-16 14:16 ` Damien Hedde
2022-04-05 5:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-04-05 12:45 ` Damien Hedde
2022-04-19 17:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-04-20 6:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-04-04 20:34 ` John Snow
2022-04-05 9:02 ` Damien Hedde
2022-04-05 9:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-04-05 18:08 ` John Snow
2022-04-06 5:18 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2022-05-25 16:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-05-30 7:12 ` Damien Hedde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tub623in.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=damien.hedde@greensocs.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.