* [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context
@ 2013-11-11 17:48 Ian Romanick
2013-11-11 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel: Silence warning in non-Valgrind build Ian Romanick
2013-11-11 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Eric Anholt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Romanick @ 2013-11-11 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ian Romanick
From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
The drm_intel_context structure is, wisely, opaque. However, libdrm
users may want to know the hardware context ID associated with the
structure.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
intel/intel_bufmgr.h | 1 +
intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr.h b/intel/intel_bufmgr.h
index 15f818e..7b28a70 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr.h
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr.h
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ drm_intel_context *drm_intel_gem_context_create(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr);
void drm_intel_gem_context_destroy(drm_intel_context *ctx);
int drm_intel_gem_bo_context_exec(drm_intel_bo *bo, drm_intel_context *ctx,
int used, unsigned int flags);
+unsigned int drm_intel_gem_context_get_hw_context_id(const drm_intel_context *);
int drm_intel_bo_gem_export_to_prime(drm_intel_bo *bo, int *prime_fd);
drm_intel_bo *drm_intel_bo_gem_create_from_prime(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index 029ca5d..5b64a7f 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -3020,6 +3020,12 @@ drm_intel_gem_context_destroy(drm_intel_context *ctx)
free(ctx);
}
+unsigned int
+drm_intel_gem_context_get_hw_context_id(const drm_intel_context *ctx)
+{
+ return ctx->ctx_id;
+}
+
int
drm_intel_reg_read(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr,
uint32_t offset,
--
1.8.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] intel: Silence warning in non-Valgrind build
2013-11-11 17:48 [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Ian Romanick
@ 2013-11-11 17:48 ` Ian Romanick
2013-11-11 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Eric Anholt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Romanick @ 2013-11-11 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ian Romanick
From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Previously GCC was squaking about:
intel_bufmgr_gem.c: In function 'drm_intel_gem_bo_map_unsynchronized':
intel_bufmgr_gem.c:1325:20: warning: unused variable 'bo_gem' [-Wunused-variable]
Wrapping with VG(); replaced that warning with:
intel_bufmgr_gem.c: In function 'drm_intel_gem_bo_map_unsynchronized':
intel_bufmgr_gem.c:1326:2: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
Which, looking at the definition of the VG macro, seems a bit weird.
It's caused by the dangling ";" left from the empty macro.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Cc: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>
---
intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index 5b64a7f..dbadc52 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -1322,7 +1322,9 @@ int drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(drm_intel_bo *bo)
int drm_intel_gem_bo_map_unsynchronized(drm_intel_bo *bo)
{
drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *bufmgr_gem = (drm_intel_bufmgr_gem *) bo->bufmgr;
+#ifdef HAVE_VALGRIND
drm_intel_bo_gem *bo_gem = (drm_intel_bo_gem *) bo;
+#endif
int ret;
/* If the CPU cache isn't coherent with the GTT, then use a
--
1.8.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context
2013-11-11 17:48 [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Ian Romanick
2013-11-11 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel: Silence warning in non-Valgrind build Ian Romanick
@ 2013-11-11 19:58 ` Eric Anholt
2013-11-13 7:08 ` Ben Widawsky
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Anholt @ 2013-11-11 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Romanick, intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ben Widawsky, Ian Romanick
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 563 bytes --]
Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org> writes:
> From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
>
> The drm_intel_context structure is, wisely, opaque. However, libdrm
> users may want to know the hardware context ID associated with the
> structure.
We've had a bunch of our other structures be partially transparent. The
context id to be passed to the kernel could easily be public just like
the gem handle in a BO is public. I would lean slightly toward that.
But I don't feel strongly either way, so these two are:
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context
2013-11-11 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Eric Anholt
@ 2013-11-13 7:08 ` Ben Widawsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2013-11-13 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Anholt; +Cc: Ian Romanick, intel-gfx, dri-devel
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:58:59AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Ian Romanick <idr@freedesktop.org> writes:
>
> > From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
> >
> > The drm_intel_context structure is, wisely, opaque. However, libdrm
> > users may want to know the hardware context ID associated with the
> > structure.
>
> We've had a bunch of our other structures be partially transparent. The
> context id to be passed to the kernel could easily be public just like
> the gem handle in a BO is public. I would lean slightly toward that.
>
> But I don't feel strongly either way, so these two are:
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
I think my preference would be to add a "context" argument to a libdrm
get_hangstats function, but if you feel this way is better, it is fine
with me.
My only [slight, unjustified] concern is that once you make the id
transparent, we can't play any games. Since the DDX doesn't use libdrm
however, I think it is fairly moot.
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-13 7:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-11 17:48 [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Ian Romanick
2013-11-11 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel: Silence warning in non-Valgrind build Ian Romanick
2013-11-11 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add accessor to get HW context ID from a drm_intel_context Eric Anholt
2013-11-13 7:08 ` Ben Widawsky
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.